Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/4] e1000: drop checksum constant cast to u16 in comparisons

[Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 09:29:43PM +0200, Jacek Kowalski wrote:

Hi Jacek,

Thanks for the patchset.

Some feedback at a high level:

1. It's normal for patch-sets, to have a cover letter.
   That provides a handy place for high level comments,
   perhaps ironically, such as this one.

2. Please provide some text in the patch description.
   I know these changes are trivial. But we'd like to have something there.
   E.g.

   Remove unnecessary cast of constants to u16,
   allowing the C type system to do it's thing.

   No behavioural change intended.
   Compile tested only.

3. This patchset should probably be targeted at iwl-next, like this:

	Subject: [PATCH iwl-next] ...

4. Please make sure the patchset applies cleanly to it's target tree.
   It seems that in it's current form the patchset doesn't
   apply to iwl-next or net-next.

5. It's up to you. But in general there is no need
   to CC linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org on Networking patches

> Signed-off-by: Jacek Kowalski <Jacek@jacekk.info>
> Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>

As for this patch itself, it looks good to me.
But I think you missed two.

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
index b5a31e8d84f4..0e5de52b1067 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
@@ -3997,7 +3997,7 @@ s32 e1000_update_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
 		}
 		checksum += eeprom_data;
 	}
-	checksum = (u16)EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
+	checksum = EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
 	if (e1000_write_eeprom(hw, EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG, 1, &checksum) < 0) {
 		e_dbg("EEPROM Write Error\n");
 		return -E1000_ERR_EEPROM;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/nvm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/nvm.c
index 1c9071396b3c..556dbefdcef9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/nvm.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/nvm.c
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ s32 e1000e_update_nvm_checksum_generic(struct e1000_hw *hw)
 		}
 		checksum += nvm_data;
 	}
-	checksum = (u16)NVM_SUM - checksum;
+	checksum = NVM_SUM - checksum;
 	ret_val = e1000_write_nvm(hw, NVM_CHECKSUM_REG, 1, &checksum);
 	if (ret_val)
 		e_dbg("NVM Write Error while updating checksum.\n");

-- 
pw-bot: changes-requested