All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: alexjlzheng@gmail.com
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: avoid unnecessary ifs_set_range_uptodate() with locks
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 11:47:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250701184737.GA9991@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250701144847.12752-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com>

On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 10:48:47PM +0800, alexjlzheng@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
> 
> In the buffer write path, iomap_set_range_uptodate() is called every
> time iomap_end_write() is called. But if folio_test_uptodate() holds, we
> know that all blocks in this folio are already in the uptodate state, so
> there is no need to go deep into the critical section of state_lock to
> execute bitmap_set().
> 
> Although state_lock may not have significant lock contention due to
> folio lock, this patch at least reduces the number of instructions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 3729391a18f3..fb4519158f3a 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ static void iomap_set_range_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t off,
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	bool uptodate = true;
>  
> +	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> +		return;

Looks fine, but how exhaustively have you tested this with heavy IO
workloads?  I /think/ it's the case that folios always creep towards
ifs_is_fully_uptodate() == true state and once they've gotten there
never go back.  But folio state bugs are tricky to detect once they've
crept in.

--D

> +
>  	if (ifs) {
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&ifs->state_lock, flags);
>  		uptodate = ifs_set_range_uptodate(folio, ifs, off, len);
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-01 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-01 14:48 [PATCH] iomap: avoid unnecessary ifs_set_range_uptodate() with locks alexjlzheng
2025-07-01 18:47 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-07-02 12:09   ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-02 18:52     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-03 13:50     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 14:33       ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-03 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 17:34   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-07-07  4:08     ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-09  3:30   ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-11  7:44     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250701184737.GA9991@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexjlzheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexjlzheng@tencent.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.