From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jacek Kowalski <jacek@jacekk.info>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/5] e1000: drop unnecessary constant casts to u16
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 20:06:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250708190635.GW452973@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e199da76-00d0-43d3-8f61-f433bc0352ad@jacekk.info>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 10:16:52AM +0200, Jacek Kowalski wrote:
> Remove unnecessary casts of constant values to u16.
> Let the C type system do it's job.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Kowalski <Jacek@jacekk.info>
> Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> index d06d29c6c037..d152026a027b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int e1000_eeprom_test(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u64 *data)
> }
>
> /* If Checksum is not Correct return error else test passed */
> - if ((checksum != (u16)EEPROM_SUM) && !(*data))
> + if ((checksum != EEPROM_SUM) && !(*data))
> *data = 2;
nit: If there is a v3 for some other reason, then I think
you could also drop the inner parentheses here.
>
> return *data;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> index f9328f2e669f..0e5de52b1067 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> @@ -3970,7 +3970,7 @@ s32 e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> return E1000_SUCCESS;
>
> #endif
> - if (checksum == (u16)EEPROM_SUM)
> + if (checksum == EEPROM_SUM)
> return E1000_SUCCESS;
> else {
> e_dbg("EEPROM Checksum Invalid\n");
> @@ -3997,7 +3997,7 @@ s32 e1000_update_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> }
> checksum += eeprom_data;
> }
> - checksum = (u16)EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
> + checksum = EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
> if (e1000_write_eeprom(hw, EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG, 1, &checksum) < 0) {
> e_dbg("EEPROM Write Error\n");
> return -E1000_ERR_EEPROM;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index d8595e84326d..09acba2ed483 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void e1000_update_mng_vlan(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> } else {
> adapter->mng_vlan_id = E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE;
> }
> - if ((old_vid != (u16)E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE) &&
> + if ((old_vid != E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE) &&
Ditto.
But more importantly, both Clang 20.1.7 W=1 builds (or at any rate, builds
with -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare), and Smatch complain
that the comparison above is now always true because E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE is
-1, while old_vid is unsigned.
Perhaps E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE should be updated to be UINT16_MAX?
> (vid != old_vid) &&
> !test_bit(old_vid, adapter->active_vlans))
> e1000_vlan_rx_kill_vid(netdev, htons(ETH_P_8021Q),
> --
> 2.47.2
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jacek Kowalski <jacek@jacekk.info>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/5] e1000: drop unnecessary constant casts to u16
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 20:06:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250708190635.GW452973@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e199da76-00d0-43d3-8f61-f433bc0352ad@jacekk.info>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 10:16:52AM +0200, Jacek Kowalski wrote:
> Remove unnecessary casts of constant values to u16.
> Let the C type system do it's job.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Kowalski <Jacek@jacekk.info>
> Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> index d06d29c6c037..d152026a027b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int e1000_eeprom_test(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u64 *data)
> }
>
> /* If Checksum is not Correct return error else test passed */
> - if ((checksum != (u16)EEPROM_SUM) && !(*data))
> + if ((checksum != EEPROM_SUM) && !(*data))
> *data = 2;
nit: If there is a v3 for some other reason, then I think
you could also drop the inner parentheses here.
>
> return *data;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> index f9328f2e669f..0e5de52b1067 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> @@ -3970,7 +3970,7 @@ s32 e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> return E1000_SUCCESS;
>
> #endif
> - if (checksum == (u16)EEPROM_SUM)
> + if (checksum == EEPROM_SUM)
> return E1000_SUCCESS;
> else {
> e_dbg("EEPROM Checksum Invalid\n");
> @@ -3997,7 +3997,7 @@ s32 e1000_update_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> }
> checksum += eeprom_data;
> }
> - checksum = (u16)EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
> + checksum = EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
> if (e1000_write_eeprom(hw, EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG, 1, &checksum) < 0) {
> e_dbg("EEPROM Write Error\n");
> return -E1000_ERR_EEPROM;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index d8595e84326d..09acba2ed483 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void e1000_update_mng_vlan(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> } else {
> adapter->mng_vlan_id = E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE;
> }
> - if ((old_vid != (u16)E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE) &&
> + if ((old_vid != E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE) &&
Ditto.
But more importantly, both Clang 20.1.7 W=1 builds (or at any rate, builds
with -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare), and Smatch complain
that the comparison above is now always true because E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE is
-1, while old_vid is unsigned.
Perhaps E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE should be updated to be UINT16_MAX?
> (vid != old_vid) &&
> !test_bit(old_vid, adapter->active_vlans))
> e1000_vlan_rx_kill_vid(netdev, htons(ETH_P_8021Q),
> --
> 2.47.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-08 8:16 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/5] drop unnecessary constant casts to u16 Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 8:16 ` Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 8:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/5] e1000: " Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 8:16 ` Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 19:06 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-08 19:06 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-08 19:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 19:40 ` Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-14 12:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2025-07-14 12:21 ` David Laight
2025-07-09 3:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " kernel test robot
2025-07-09 3:03 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-11 17:25 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2025-07-11 17:25 ` David Laight
2025-07-08 8:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 2/5] e1000e: " Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 8:17 ` Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 19:07 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2025-07-08 19:07 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-08 8:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 3/5] igb: " Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 8:17 ` Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 19:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2025-07-08 19:08 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-08 8:18 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 4/5] igc: " Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 8:18 ` Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 19:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Simon Horman
2025-07-08 19:08 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-08 8:18 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 5/5] ixgbe: " Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 8:18 ` Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 8:54 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2025-07-08 8:54 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2025-07-08 9:34 ` Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 10:26 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2025-07-08 10:26 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2025-07-08 11:13 ` Jacek Kowalski
2025-07-08 19:08 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-08 19:08 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250708190635.GW452973@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacek@jacekk.info \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.