From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
liuhangbin@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink: try double sleep to give WQ a chance
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 07:53:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250710145312.3361964-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
The rtnetlink test for preferred lifetime of an address is quite flaky.
Problems started around the 6.16 merge window in May. The test fails
with:
FAIL: preferred_lft addresses remaining
and unlike most of our flakes this one fails on the "normal" kernel
builds, not the builds with kernel/configs/debug.config. I suspect
the flakes may be related to power saving, since the expirations
run from a "power efficient" workqueue. Adding a short sleep seems
to decrease the flakes by 8x but they still happen. With this
patch in place we get a flake every couple of weeks, not every
couple of days. Better ideas welcome..
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: liuhangbin@gmail.com
CC: shuah@kernel.org
CC: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
index 2e8243a65b50..b9e1497ea27a 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
@@ -299,6 +299,11 @@ kci_test_addrlft()
done
sleep 5
+ # Schedule out for a bit, address GC runs from the power efficient WQ
+ # if the long sleep above has put the whole system into sleep state
+ # the WQ may have not had a chance to run.
+ sleep 0.1
+
run_cmd_grep_fail "10.23.11." ip addr show dev "$devdummy"
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
check_err 1
--
2.50.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 14:53 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-07-11 2:14 ` [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink: try double sleep to give WQ a chance Hangbin Liu
2025-07-11 14:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-14 7:19 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-07-14 22:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250710145312.3361964-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.