All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink: try double sleep to give WQ a chance
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 02:14:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHBza5P50wcKjG_h@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710145312.3361964-1-kuba@kernel.org>

On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 07:53:12AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> The rtnetlink test for preferred lifetime of an address is quite flaky.
> Problems started around the 6.16 merge window in May. The test fails
> with:
> 
>    FAIL: preferred_lft addresses remaining
> 
> and unlike most of our flakes this one fails on the "normal" kernel
> builds, not the builds with kernel/configs/debug.config. I suspect
> the flakes may be related to power saving, since the expirations
> run from a "power efficient" workqueue. Adding a short sleep seems
> to decrease the flakes by 8x but they still happen. With this
> patch in place we get a flake every couple of weeks, not every
> couple of days. Better ideas welcome..
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> CC: liuhangbin@gmail.com
> CC: shuah@kernel.org
> CC: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
> index 2e8243a65b50..b9e1497ea27a 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh
> @@ -299,6 +299,11 @@ kci_test_addrlft()
>  	done
>  
>  	sleep 5
> +	# Schedule out for a bit, address GC runs from the power efficient WQ
> +	# if the long sleep above has put the whole system into sleep state
> +	# the WQ may have not had a chance to run.
> +	sleep 0.1
> +

How about use slowwait to check if the address still exists. e.g.

check_addr_not_exist()
{
	dev=$1
	addr=$2
	if ip addr show dev $dev | grep -q $addr; then
		return 1
	else
		return 0
}

	slowwait 5 check_addr_not_exist "$devdummy" "10.23.11."

>  	run_cmd_grep_fail "10.23.11." ip addr show dev "$devdummy"
>  	if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
>  		check_err 1
> -- 
> 2.50.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-11  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-10 14:53 [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink: try double sleep to give WQ a chance Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-11  2:14 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-07-11 14:17   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-14  7:19     ` Hangbin Liu
2025-07-14 22:30       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aHBza5P50wcKjG_h@fedora \
    --to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.