All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, bjorn@kernel.org,
	magnus.karlsson@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] igb: xsk: solve underflow of nb_pkts in zerocopy mode
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 11:12:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250721101217.GC2459@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721083343.16482-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 04:33:43PM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> 
> There is no break time in the while() loop, so every time at the end of
> igb_xmit_zc(), underflow of nb_pkts will occur, which renders the return
> value always false. But theoretically, the result should be set after
> calling xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(). We can take i40e_xmit_zc() as
> a good example.
> 
> Returning false means we're not done with transmission and we need one
> more poll, which is exactly what igb_xmit_zc() always did before this
> patch. After this patch, the return value depends on the nb_pkts value.
> Two cases might happen then:
> 1. if (nb_pkts < budget), it means we process all the possible data, so
>    return true and no more necessary poll will be triggered because of
>    this.
> 2. if (nb_pkts == budget), it means we might have more data, so return
>    false to let another poll run again.
> 
> Fixes: f8e284a02afc ("igb: Add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> index 5cf67ba29269..243f4246fee8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ bool igb_xmit_zc(struct igb_ring *tx_ring, struct xsk_buff_pool *xsk_pool)
>  	if (!nb_pkts)
>  		return true;
>  
> -	while (nb_pkts-- > 0) {
> +	while (i < nb_pkts) {

Hi Jason,

FWIIW, I think using a for loop is a more idiomatic way
of handling the relationship between i, nb_pkts, and
the iterations of this loop.

>  		dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xsk_pool, descs[i].addr);
>  		xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xsk_pool, dma, descs[i].len);
>  
> -- 
> 2.41.3
> 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, bjorn@kernel.org,
	magnus.karlsson@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 2/2] igb: xsk: solve underflow of nb_pkts in zerocopy mode
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 11:12:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250721101217.GC2459@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721083343.16482-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 04:33:43PM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> 
> There is no break time in the while() loop, so every time at the end of
> igb_xmit_zc(), underflow of nb_pkts will occur, which renders the return
> value always false. But theoretically, the result should be set after
> calling xsk_tx_peek_release_desc_batch(). We can take i40e_xmit_zc() as
> a good example.
> 
> Returning false means we're not done with transmission and we need one
> more poll, which is exactly what igb_xmit_zc() always did before this
> patch. After this patch, the return value depends on the nb_pkts value.
> Two cases might happen then:
> 1. if (nb_pkts < budget), it means we process all the possible data, so
>    return true and no more necessary poll will be triggered because of
>    this.
> 2. if (nb_pkts == budget), it means we might have more data, so return
>    false to let another poll run again.
> 
> Fixes: f8e284a02afc ("igb: Add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> index 5cf67ba29269..243f4246fee8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ bool igb_xmit_zc(struct igb_ring *tx_ring, struct xsk_buff_pool *xsk_pool)
>  	if (!nb_pkts)
>  		return true;
>  
> -	while (nb_pkts-- > 0) {
> +	while (i < nb_pkts) {

Hi Jason,

FWIIW, I think using a for loop is a more idiomatic way
of handling the relationship between i, nb_pkts, and
the iterations of this loop.

>  		dma = xsk_buff_raw_get_dma(xsk_pool, descs[i].addr);
>  		xsk_buff_raw_dma_sync_for_device(xsk_pool, dma, descs[i].len);
>  
> -- 
> 2.41.3
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-21 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-21  8:33 [PATCH net-next 0/2] xsk: fix underflow issues in zerocopy xmit Jason Xing
2025-07-21  8:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jason Xing
2025-07-21  8:33 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] stmmac: xsk: fix underflow of budget in zerocopy mode Jason Xing
2025-07-21  8:33   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jason Xing
2025-07-21  8:56   ` Paul Menzel
2025-07-21  9:15     ` Jason Xing
2025-07-22 14:16       ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-07-22 15:53         ` Jason Xing
2025-07-22 17:29           ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-07-22 23:04             ` Jason Xing
2025-07-21 15:37   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-07-21 15:37     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Stanislav Fomichev
2025-07-21 23:05     ` Jason Xing
2025-07-21 23:05       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jason Xing
2025-07-22  0:12       ` Jason Xing
2025-07-22  0:12         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jason Xing
2025-07-21  8:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] igb: xsk: solve underflow of nb_pkts " Jason Xing
2025-07-21  8:33   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jason Xing
2025-07-21 10:12   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-21 10:12     ` Simon Horman
2025-07-21 10:22     ` Jason Xing
2025-07-21 10:22       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250721101217.GC2459@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.