All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* defragmenting non-files only
@ 2025-07-27 20:33 Eric Wong
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Eric Wong @ 2025-07-27 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

I'm wondering how much fragmentation affects users with large
active Maildirs where files are frequently created and removed.

I'm avoiding a blanket `btrfs fi defrag -r` to reduce storage
wear for files which won't live long.

So some questions:

1. how to monitor fragmentation of subvolume/extent tree or
   anything else which filefrag(8) doesn't seem to report
   fragmentation for?

2. does `btrfs fi defrag $DIR' work only for that directory?
   In other words, can I `btrfs fi defrag $TOPLEVEL_DIR` and
   expect subdirectories to be defragmented?

   Or should I do:

	find $TOPLEVEL_DIR -type d -print0 | xargs -0 btrfs fi defrag
   ?

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-07-27 20:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-27 20:33 defragmenting non-files only Eric Wong

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.