All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Clément Le Goffic" <clement.legoffic@foss.st.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Gatien Chevallier" <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Gabriel Fernandez" <gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com>,
	"Le Goffic" <legoffic.clement@gmail.com>,
	"Julius Werner" <jwerner@chromium.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	"Clément Le Goffic" <clement.legoffic@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:43:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396@foss.st.com>

Hi Clément,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on 89be9a83ccf1f88522317ce02f854f30d6115c41]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Cl-ment-Le-Goffic/bus-firewall-move-stm32_firewall-header-file-in-include-folder/20250728-234144
base:   89be9a83ccf1f88522317ce02f854f30d6115c41
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver
config: s390-randconfig-001-20250730 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:213:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     213 |         writel_relaxed(r->start.mask, pmu->membase + r->start.reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:220:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     220 |         writel_relaxed(r->stop.mask, pmu->membase + r->stop.reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:227:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     227 |         writel_relaxed(r->clear_time.mask, pmu->membase + r->clear_time.reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:234:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     234 |         writel_relaxed(r->clear_cnt.mask & BIT(counter->idx), pmu->membase + r->clear_cnt.reg);
         |         ^
>> drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:240:15: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     240 |         u32 status = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->status.reg);
         |                      ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:255:12: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     255 |         u32 val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->enable.reg);
         |                   ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:258:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     258 |         writel_relaxed(val, pmu->membase + r->enable.reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:264:12: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     264 |         u32 val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->enable.reg);
         |                   ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:267:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     267 |         writel_relaxed(val, pmu->membase + r->enable.reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:285:17: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     285 |                 cnt_sel_val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->cfg.reg);
         |                               ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:288:3: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     288 |                 writel_relaxed(cnt_sel_val, pmu->membase + r->cfg.reg);
         |                 ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:302:16: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     302 |         cnt_sel_val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + cnt_sel_evt_reg);
         |                       ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:306:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     306 |         writel_relaxed(cnt_sel_val, pmu->membase + cnt_sel_evt_reg);
         |         ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:428:9: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     428 |                 val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->counter_evt[counter->idx].reg);
         |                       ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:778:3: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     778 |                 writel_relaxed(pmu->dram_type, pmu->membase + pmu->cfg->regs->dram_inf.reg);
         |                 ^
   drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:803:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     803 |         writel_relaxed(pmu->dram_type, pmu->membase + pmu->cfg->regs->dram_inf.reg);
         |         ^
   16 errors generated.


vim +/writel_relaxed +213 drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c

   208	
   209	static void stm32_ddr_start_counters(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu)
   210	{
   211		const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
   212	
 > 213		writel_relaxed(r->start.mask, pmu->membase + r->start.reg);
   214	}
   215	
   216	static void stm32_ddr_stop_counters(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu)
   217	{
   218		const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
   219	
   220		writel_relaxed(r->stop.mask, pmu->membase + r->stop.reg);
   221	}
   222	
   223	static void stm32_ddr_clear_time_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu)
   224	{
   225		const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
   226	
   227		writel_relaxed(r->clear_time.mask, pmu->membase + r->clear_time.reg);
   228	}
   229	
   230	static void stm32_ddr_clear_event_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu, struct stm32_ddr_cnt *counter)
   231	{
   232		const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
   233	
   234		writel_relaxed(r->clear_cnt.mask & BIT(counter->idx), pmu->membase + r->clear_cnt.reg);
   235	}
   236	
   237	static void stm32_ddr_clear_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu, struct stm32_ddr_cnt *counter)
   238	{
   239		const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs;
 > 240		u32 status = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->status.reg);
   241	
   242		if (counter->idx == pmu->cfg->time_cnt_idx)
   243			stm32_ddr_clear_time_counter(pmu);
   244		else
   245			stm32_ddr_clear_event_counter(pmu, counter);
   246	
   247		if (status & r->status.mask)
   248			dev_err(pmu->dev, "Failed to clear counter %i because the PMU is busy\n",
   249				counter->idx);
   250	}
   251	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-30 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-28 15:29 [PATCH v5 00/20] Introduce STM32 DDR PMU for STM32MP platforms Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] bus: firewall: move stm32_firewall header file in include folder Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] dt-bindings: stm32: stm32mp25: add `#access-controller-cells` property Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:50   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] clk: stm32mp25: add firewall grant_access ops Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] arm64: dts: st: set rcc as an access-controller Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] dt-bindings: memory: factorise LPDDR props into SDRAM props Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-30 18:27   ` Julius Werner
2025-08-14 14:06     ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] dt-bindings: memory: introduce DDR4 Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-30 18:29   ` Julius Werner
2025-08-14 14:40     ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-30 21:11   ` Rob Herring
2025-08-14 14:42     ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-08-17  7:19       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-22 13:59         ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] dt-bindings: memory: factorise LPDDR channel binding into SDRAM channel Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:52   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] dt-binding: memory: add DDR4 channel compatible Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:52   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] dt-bindings: memory: SDRAM channel: standardise node name Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:53   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] arm64: dts: st: add LPDDR channel to stm32mp257f-dk board Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] arm64: dts: st: add DDR channel to stm32mp257f-ev1 board Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] dt-bindings: perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM dt-bindings Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-31 13:54   ` Rob Herring
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-30 14:43   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] Documentation: perf: stm32: add ddrperfm support Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] MAINTAINERS: add myself as STM32 DDR PMU maintainer Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] ARM: dts: stm32: add ddrperfm on stm32mp131 Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] ARM: dts: stm32: add ddrperfm on stm32mp151 Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] arm64: dts: st: add ddrperfm on stm32mp251 Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] arm64: dts: st: support ddrperfm on stm32mp257f-dk Clément Le Goffic
2025-07-28 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] arm64: dts: st: support ddrperfm on stm32mp257f-ev1 Clément Le Goffic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=clement.legoffic@foss.st.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com \
    --cc=gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=legoffic.clement@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.