All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, pabeni@redhat.com, song@kernel.org,
	sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, yhs@fb.com,
	edumazet@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, Mahanta.Jambigi@ibm.com,
	Sidraya.Jayagond@ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com,
	wintera@linux.ibm.com, dust.li@linux.alibaba.com,
	tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jaka@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out()
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 16:42:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250731084240.86550-3-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731084240.86550-1-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>

BPF CI testing report a UAF issue:

  [   16.446633] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000003  0
  [   16.447134] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mod  e
  [   16.447516] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present pag  e
  [   16.447878] PGD 0 P4D   0
  [   16.448063] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPT  I
  [   16.448409] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Tainted: G           OE      6.13.0-rc3-g89e8a75fda73-dirty #4  2
  [   16.449124] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODUL  E
  [   16.449502] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/201  4
  [   16.450201] Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_wor  k
  [   16.450531] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159  0
  [   16.452158] RSP: 0018:ffffb5ab40053d98 EFLAGS: 0001024  6
  [   16.452526] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 000000000000030  0
  [   16.452994] RDX: 0000000000000280 RSI: 00003513840053f0 RDI: 000000000000000  0
  [   16.453492] RBP: ffffa097808e3800 R08: ffffa09782dba1e0 R09: 000000000000000  5
  [   16.453987] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa0978274640  0
  [   16.454497] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffa09782d4092  0
  [   16.454996] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa097bbc00000(0000) knlGS:000000000000000  0
  [   16.455557] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003  3
  [   16.455961] CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 0000000102788004 CR4: 0000000000770ef  0
  [   16.456459] PKRU: 5555555  4
  [   16.456654] Call Trace  :
  [   16.456832]  <TASK  >
  [   16.456989]  ? __die+0x23/0x7  0
  [   16.457215]  ? page_fault_oops+0x180/0x4c  0
  [   16.457508]  ? __lock_acquire+0x3e6/0x249  0
  [   16.457801]  ? exc_page_fault+0x68/0x20  0
  [   16.458080]  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x3  0
  [   16.458389]  ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159  0
  [   16.458689]  ? smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x159  0
  [   16.458987]  ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x10  0
  [   16.459284]  process_one_work+0x1ea/0x6d  0
  [   16.459570]  worker_thread+0x1c3/0x38  0
  [   16.459839]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x1  0
  [   16.460144]  kthread+0xe0/0x11  0
  [   16.460372]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1  0
  [   16.460640]  ret_from_fork+0x31/0x5  0
  [   16.460896]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x1  0
  [   16.461166]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x3  0
  [   16.461453]  </TASK  >
  [   16.461616] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(OE)  ]
  [   16.462134] CR2: 000000000000003  0
  [   16.462380] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
  [   16.462710] RIP: 0010:smc_listen_work+0xc02/0x1590

The direct cause of this issue is that after smc_listen_out_connected(),
newclcsock->sk may be NULL since it will releases the smcsk. Therefore,
if the application closes the socket immediately after accept,
newclcsock->sk can be NULL. A possible execution order could be as
follows:

smc_listen_work                                 | userspace
-----------------------------------------------------------------
lock_sock(sk)                                   |
smc_listen_out_connected()                      |
| \- smc_listen_out                             |
|    | \- release_sock                          |
     | |- sk->sk_data_ready()                   |
                                                | fd = accept();
                                                | close(fd);
                                                |  \- socket->sk = NULL;
/* newclcsock->sk is NULL now */
SMC_STAT_SERV_SUCC_INC(sock_net(newclcsock->sk))

Since smc_listen_out_connected() will not fail, simply swapping the order
of the code can easily fix this issue.

Fixes: 3b2dec2603d5 ("net/smc: restructure client and server code in af_smc")
Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 1882bab8e00e..dc72ff353813 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -2568,8 +2568,9 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
 			goto out_decl;
 	}
 
-	smc_listen_out_connected(new_smc);
 	SMC_STAT_SERV_SUCC_INC(sock_net(newclcsock->sk), ini);
+	/* smc_listen_out() will release smcsk */
+	smc_listen_out_connected(new_smc);
 	goto out_free;
 
 out_unlock:
-- 
2.45.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-31  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-31  8:42 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] net/smc: Introduce smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe
2025-07-31  8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: export necessary sympols for modules with struct_ops D. Wythe
2025-07-31 12:53   ` Alexandra Winter
2025-08-11  2:23     ` D. Wythe
2025-07-31  8:42 ` D. Wythe [this message]
2025-07-31 12:57   ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out() Alexandra Winter
2025-08-11  1:54     ` D. Wythe
2025-08-11  9:24       ` Alexandra Winter
2025-08-11 15:33         ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-18  5:39           ` D. Wythe
2025-07-31  8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] net/smc: bpf: Introduce generic hook for handshake flow D. Wythe
2025-07-31 19:55   ` kernel test robot
2025-07-31  8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] libbpf: fix error when st-prefix_ops and ops from differ btf D. Wythe
2025-07-31  8:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_hs_ctrl D. Wythe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250731084240.86550-3-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=Mahanta.Jambigi@ibm.com \
    --cc=Sidraya.Jayagond@ibm.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.