From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jedrzej Jagielski <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1] ixgbe: reduce number of reads when getting OROM data
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 12:21:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250801112125.GO8494@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731125025.1683557-1-jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 02:50:25PM +0200, Jedrzej Jagielski wrote:
> Currently, during locating the CIVD section, the ixgbe driver loops
> over the OROM area and at each iteration reads only OROM-datastruct-size
> amount of data. This results in many small reads and is inefficient.
>
> Optimize this by reading the entire OROM bank into memory once before
> entering the loop. This significantly reduces the probing time.
>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jedrzej Jagielski <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>
Thanks, nits below not withstanding, this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c | 58 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c
> index 87b03c1992a8..048b2aae155a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c
> @@ -3006,50 +3006,70 @@ static int ixgbe_get_nvm_srev(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
> * Searches through the Option ROM flash contents to locate the CIVD data for
> * the image.
> *
> - * Return: the exit code of the operation.
> + * Return: -ENOMEM when cannot allocate memory, -EDOM for checksum violation,
> + * -ENODATA when cannot find proper data, -EIO for faulty read or
> + * 0 on success.
> + *
> + * On success @civd stores collected data.
> */
> static int
> ixgbe_get_orom_civd_data(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, enum ixgbe_bank_select bank,
> struct ixgbe_orom_civd_info *civd)
> {
> - struct ixgbe_orom_civd_info tmp;
> + u32 orom_size = hw->flash.banks.orom_size;
> + u8 *orom_data;
> u32 offset;
> int err;
>
> + orom_data = kzalloc(orom_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!orom_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + err = ixgbe_read_flash_module(hw, bank,
> + IXGBE_E610_SR_1ST_OROM_BANK_PTR, 0,
> + orom_data, orom_size);
> + if (err) {
> + err = -EIO;
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> /* The CIVD section is located in the Option ROM aligned to 512 bytes.
> * The first 4 bytes must contain the ASCII characters "$CIV".
> * A simple modulo 256 sum of all of the bytes of the structure must
> * equal 0.
> */
> - for (offset = 0; (offset + SZ_512) <= hw->flash.banks.orom_size;
> - offset += SZ_512) {
> + for (offset = 0; (offset + SZ_512) <= orom_size; offset += SZ_512) {
nit: while we are here the inner parentheses could be removed
> + struct ixgbe_orom_civd_info *tmp;
> u8 sum = 0;
> u32 i;
>
> - err = ixgbe_read_flash_module(hw, bank,
> - IXGBE_E610_SR_1ST_OROM_BANK_PTR,
> - offset,
> - (u8 *)&tmp, sizeof(tmp));
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*tmp) > SZ_512);
> +
> + tmp = (struct ixgbe_orom_civd_info *)&orom_data[offset];
>
> /* Skip forward until we find a matching signature */
> - if (memcmp(IXGBE_OROM_CIV_SIGNATURE, tmp.signature,
> - sizeof(tmp.signature)))
> + if (memcmp(IXGBE_OROM_CIV_SIGNATURE, tmp->signature,
> + sizeof(tmp->signature)))
> continue;
>
> /* Verify that the simple checksum is zero */
> - for (i = 0; i < sizeof(tmp); i++)
> - sum += ((u8 *)&tmp)[i];
> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*tmp); i++)
> + sum += ((u8 *)tmp)[i];
>
> - if (sum)
> - return -EDOM;
> + if (sum) {
> + err = -EDOM;
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
>
> - *civd = tmp;
> - return 0;
> + *civd = *tmp;
> + err = 0;
> + goto cleanup;
nit: maybe it's just me, but break feels more natural here.
> }
>
> - return -ENODATA;
> + err = -ENODATA;
> +cleanup:
> + kfree(orom_data);
> + return err;
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jedrzej Jagielski <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v1] ixgbe: reduce number of reads when getting OROM data
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 12:21:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250801112125.GO8494@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250731125025.1683557-1-jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 02:50:25PM +0200, Jedrzej Jagielski wrote:
> Currently, during locating the CIVD section, the ixgbe driver loops
> over the OROM area and at each iteration reads only OROM-datastruct-size
> amount of data. This results in many small reads and is inefficient.
>
> Optimize this by reading the entire OROM bank into memory once before
> entering the loop. This significantly reduces the probing time.
>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jedrzej Jagielski <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>
Thanks, nits below not withstanding, this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c | 58 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c
> index 87b03c1992a8..048b2aae155a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c
> @@ -3006,50 +3006,70 @@ static int ixgbe_get_nvm_srev(struct ixgbe_hw *hw,
> * Searches through the Option ROM flash contents to locate the CIVD data for
> * the image.
> *
> - * Return: the exit code of the operation.
> + * Return: -ENOMEM when cannot allocate memory, -EDOM for checksum violation,
> + * -ENODATA when cannot find proper data, -EIO for faulty read or
> + * 0 on success.
> + *
> + * On success @civd stores collected data.
> */
> static int
> ixgbe_get_orom_civd_data(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, enum ixgbe_bank_select bank,
> struct ixgbe_orom_civd_info *civd)
> {
> - struct ixgbe_orom_civd_info tmp;
> + u32 orom_size = hw->flash.banks.orom_size;
> + u8 *orom_data;
> u32 offset;
> int err;
>
> + orom_data = kzalloc(orom_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!orom_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + err = ixgbe_read_flash_module(hw, bank,
> + IXGBE_E610_SR_1ST_OROM_BANK_PTR, 0,
> + orom_data, orom_size);
> + if (err) {
> + err = -EIO;
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> /* The CIVD section is located in the Option ROM aligned to 512 bytes.
> * The first 4 bytes must contain the ASCII characters "$CIV".
> * A simple modulo 256 sum of all of the bytes of the structure must
> * equal 0.
> */
> - for (offset = 0; (offset + SZ_512) <= hw->flash.banks.orom_size;
> - offset += SZ_512) {
> + for (offset = 0; (offset + SZ_512) <= orom_size; offset += SZ_512) {
nit: while we are here the inner parentheses could be removed
> + struct ixgbe_orom_civd_info *tmp;
> u8 sum = 0;
> u32 i;
>
> - err = ixgbe_read_flash_module(hw, bank,
> - IXGBE_E610_SR_1ST_OROM_BANK_PTR,
> - offset,
> - (u8 *)&tmp, sizeof(tmp));
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*tmp) > SZ_512);
> +
> + tmp = (struct ixgbe_orom_civd_info *)&orom_data[offset];
>
> /* Skip forward until we find a matching signature */
> - if (memcmp(IXGBE_OROM_CIV_SIGNATURE, tmp.signature,
> - sizeof(tmp.signature)))
> + if (memcmp(IXGBE_OROM_CIV_SIGNATURE, tmp->signature,
> + sizeof(tmp->signature)))
> continue;
>
> /* Verify that the simple checksum is zero */
> - for (i = 0; i < sizeof(tmp); i++)
> - sum += ((u8 *)&tmp)[i];
> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*tmp); i++)
> + sum += ((u8 *)tmp)[i];
>
> - if (sum)
> - return -EDOM;
> + if (sum) {
> + err = -EDOM;
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
>
> - *civd = tmp;
> - return 0;
> + *civd = *tmp;
> + err = 0;
> + goto cleanup;
nit: maybe it's just me, but break feels more natural here.
> }
>
> - return -ENODATA;
> + err = -ENODATA;
> +cleanup:
> + kfree(orom_data);
> + return err;
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-31 12:50 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1] ixgbe: reduce number of reads when getting OROM data Jedrzej Jagielski
2025-07-31 12:50 ` Jedrzej Jagielski
2025-07-31 17:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jacob Keller
2025-08-01 11:21 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-08-01 11:21 ` Simon Horman
2025-08-02 11:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250801112125.GO8494@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.