From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jialin Wang <wjl.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Penglei Jiang <superman.xpt@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: proc_maps_open allow proc_mem_open to return NULL
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 15:46:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250807154606.131d96b133c19baca0c5f2e6@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250807165455.73656-1-wjl.linux@gmail.com>
On Fri, 8 Aug 2025 00:54:55 +0800 Jialin Wang <wjl.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> The commit 65c66047259f ("proc: fix the issue of proc_mem_open returning NULL")
> breaks `perf record -g -p PID` when profiling a kernel thread.
>
> The strace of `perf record -g -p $(pgrep kswapd0)` shows:
>
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/65/task/65/maps", O_RDONLY) = -1 ESRCH (No such process)
>
> This patch partially reverts the commit to fix it.
Thanks. But "breaks" is a rather thin description of the problem!
Can you please describe the observed misbehavior fully?
> Fixes: 65c66047259f ("proc: fix the issue of proc_mem_open returning NULL")
Because we should backport this fix into 6.16.x -stable kernels. The
-stable maintainers may wonder why we're requesting this. Also, any
person who is having problems with their 6.16-based kernel will want
such a description so they can decide whether this fix might address
their problem.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-07 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-07 16:54 [PATCH] proc: proc_maps_open allow proc_mem_open to return NULL Jialin Wang
2025-08-07 22:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-08-08 12:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Jialin Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-14 16:09 [PATCH] " Dennis Beier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250807154606.131d96b133c19baca0c5f2e6@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=superman.xpt@gmail.com \
--cc=wjl.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.