Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] sigrelse01: Select signals based on SIGRTMIN/SIGRTMAX for musl compat

[Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>]

Hi Florian, Pedro,

> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:00:38PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Florian, Pedro,

> > > This avoids selecting signal 34 when the test is run using
> > > musl. Signal 34 is used internally by musl as SIGSYNCCALL.
> > > Consequently, musl's signal() will return with an error status and
> > > errno set to EINVAL when trying to setup a signal handler for signal
> > > 34, causing the sigrelse01 test to fail.

> > +1, now it works on both glibc and musl (and hopefully in the rest of libc).

> > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > Tested-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>

> > > Thanks to Pedro Falcato for suggesting using SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX for
> > > this check.

> > nit: @Florian instead of the above I'll add:
> > Suggested-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>

> > @Pedro Can I merge with your RBT?

> Assuming you mean Reviewed-by, yep, all fine by me.

Thank you both! Patch merged.

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp