Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 iwl-next 1/2] igbvf: add lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes to ethtool statistics

[Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 12:18:26AM +0900, Kohei Enju wrote:
> Currently ethtool shows lbrx_packets and lbrx_bytes (Good RX
> Packets/Octets loopback Count), but doesn't show the TX-side equivalents
> (lbtx_packets and lbtx_bytes). Add visibility of those missing
> statistics by adding them to ethtool statistics.
> 
> In addition, the order of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets is not consistent
> with non-loopback statistics (rx_packets, rx_bytes). Therefore,
> align the order by swapping positions of lbrx_bytes and lbrx_packets.
> 
> Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection.
> 
> Before:
>   # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)"
>        rx_packets: 135
>        tx_packets: 106
>        rx_bytes: 16010
>        tx_bytes: 12451
>        lbrx_bytes: 1148
>        lbrx_packets: 12
> 
> After:
>   # ethtool -S ens5 | grep -E "x_(bytes|packets)"
>        rx_packets: 748
>        tx_packets: 304
>        rx_bytes: 81513
>        tx_bytes: 33698
>        lbrx_packets: 97
>        lbtx_packets: 109
>        lbrx_bytes: 12090
>        lbtx_bytes: 12401
> 
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enjuk@amazon.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>