From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@axis.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/37] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 17:03:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250901150359.867252-12-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250901150359.867252-1-david@redhat.com>
Let's limit the maximum folio size in problematic kernel config where
the memmap is allocated per memory section (SPARSEMEM without
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) to a single memory section.
Currently, only a single architectures supports ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
but not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP: sh.
Fortunately, the biggest hugetlb size sh supports is 64 MiB
(HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_64MB) and the section size is at least 64 MiB
(SECTION_SIZE_BITS == 26), so their use case is not degraded.
As folios and memory sections are naturally aligned to their order-2 size
in memory, consequently a single folio can no longer span multiple memory
sections on these problematic kernel configs.
nth_page() is no longer required when operating within a single compound
page / folio.
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 77737cbf2216a..2dee79fa2efcf 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2053,11 +2053,25 @@ static inline long folio_nr_pages(const struct folio *folio)
return folio_large_nr_pages(folio);
}
-/* Only hugetlbfs can allocate folios larger than MAX_ORDER */
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
-#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER
-#else
+#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE)
+/*
+ * We don't expect any folios that exceed buddy sizes (and consequently
+ * memory sections).
+ */
#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER MAX_PAGE_ORDER
+#elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
+/*
+ * Only pages within a single memory section are guaranteed to be
+ * contiguous. By limiting folios to a single memory section, all folio
+ * pages are guaranteed to be contiguous.
+ */
+#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PFN_SECTION_SHIFT
+#else
+/*
+ * There is no real limit on the folio size. We limit them to the maximum we
+ * currently expect (e.g., hugetlb, dax).
+ */
+#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER
#endif
#define MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES (1UL << MAX_FOLIO_ORDER)
--
2.50.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@axis.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/37] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 17:03:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250901150359.867252-12-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250901150359.867252-1-david@redhat.com>
Let's limit the maximum folio size in problematic kernel config where
the memmap is allocated per memory section (SPARSEMEM without
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) to a single memory section.
Currently, only a single architectures supports ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
but not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP: sh.
Fortunately, the biggest hugetlb size sh supports is 64 MiB
(HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_64MB) and the section size is at least 64 MiB
(SECTION_SIZE_BITS == 26), so their use case is not degraded.
As folios and memory sections are naturally aligned to their order-2 size
in memory, consequently a single folio can no longer span multiple memory
sections on these problematic kernel configs.
nth_page() is no longer required when operating within a single compound
page / folio.
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 77737cbf2216a..2dee79fa2efcf 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2053,11 +2053,25 @@ static inline long folio_nr_pages(const struct folio *folio)
return folio_large_nr_pages(folio);
}
-/* Only hugetlbfs can allocate folios larger than MAX_ORDER */
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
-#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER
-#else
+#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE)
+/*
+ * We don't expect any folios that exceed buddy sizes (and consequently
+ * memory sections).
+ */
#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER MAX_PAGE_ORDER
+#elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
+/*
+ * Only pages within a single memory section are guaranteed to be
+ * contiguous. By limiting folios to a single memory section, all folio
+ * pages are guaranteed to be contiguous.
+ */
+#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PFN_SECTION_SHIFT
+#else
+/*
+ * There is no real limit on the folio size. We limit them to the maximum we
+ * currently expect (e.g., hugetlb, dax).
+ */
+#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER
#endif
#define MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES (1UL << MAX_FOLIO_ORDER)
--
2.50.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 148+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-01 15:03 [PATCH v2 00/37] mm: remove nth_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/37] mm: stop making SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP user-selectable David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/37] arm64: Kconfig: drop superfluous "select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP" David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/37] s390/Kconfig: " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/37] x86/Kconfig: " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/37] wireguard: selftests: remove CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y from qemu kernel config David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-08 16:48 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2025-09-08 16:48 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/37] mm/page_alloc: reject unreasonable folio/compound page sizes in alloc_contig_range_noprof() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/37] mm/memremap: reject unreasonable folio/compound page sizes in memremap_pages() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/37] mm/hugetlb: check for unreasonable folio sizes when registering hstate David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 7:14 ` (bisected) " Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 7:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 7:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 7:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 7:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 7:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 8:04 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 8:04 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 8:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 8:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 9:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 9:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 10:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 10:01 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 10:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 10:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 12:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 12:08 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-09 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-09 13:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/37] mm/mm_init: make memmap_init_compound() look more like prep_compound_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/37] mm: sanity-check maximum folio size in folio_set_order() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/37] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 12/37] mm: simplify folio_page() and folio_page_idx() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 13/37] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 14/37] mm/mm/percpu-km: drop nth_page() usage within single allocation David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 15/37] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 16/37] fs: hugetlbfs: cleanup " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 17/37] mm/pagewalk: drop nth_page() usage within folio in folio_walk_start() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 18/37] mm/gup: drop nth_page() usage within folio when recording subpages David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 19/37] mm/gup: remove record_subpages() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-05 6:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-05 6:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-05 11:26 ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-05 11:26 ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-05 11:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-05 11:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-05 11:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-05 11:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-05 23:00 ` Eric Biggers
2025-09-05 23:00 ` Eric Biggers
2025-09-06 6:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-06 6:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-09 4:25 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-09 4:25 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-06 1:05 ` John Hubbard
2025-09-06 1:05 ` John Hubbard
2025-09-06 6:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-06 6:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-06 7:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-06 7:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-07 5:14 ` John Hubbard
2025-09-07 5:14 ` John Hubbard
2025-09-08 8:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-08 8:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-08 12:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-08 12:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-08 12:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-08 12:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-08 17:12 ` John Hubbard
2025-09-08 17:12 ` John Hubbard
2025-09-08 15:16 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-08 15:16 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-08 15:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-08 15:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-08 15:28 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-08 15:28 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 20/37] io_uring/zcrx: remove nth_page() usage within folio David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 21/37] mips: mm: convert __flush_dcache_pages() to __flush_dcache_folio_pages() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 22/37] mm/cma: refuse handing out non-contiguous page ranges David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-09 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-09 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 23/37] dma-remap: drop nth_page() in dma_common_contiguous_remap() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 24/37] scatterlist: disallow non-contigous page ranges in a single SG entry David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 25/37] ata: libata-sff: drop nth_page() usage within " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 26/37] drm/i915/gem: " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-02 9:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-09-02 9:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-09-02 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-02 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 27/37] mspro_block: " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 28/37] memstick: " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 29/37] mmc: " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 30/37] scsi: scsi_lib: " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 31/37] scsi: sg: " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 32/37] vfio/pci: " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 33/37] crypto: remove " David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 34/37] mm/gup: drop nth_page() usage in unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 35/37] kfence: drop nth_page() usage David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 36/37] block: update comment of "struct bio_vec" regarding nth_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 37/37] mm: remove nth_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 15:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 16:17 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,01/37] mm: stop making SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP user-selectable Patchwork
2025-09-01 21:38 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-05 8:13 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for mm: remove nth_page() (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-06 7:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for mm: remove nth_page() (rev3) Patchwork
2025-09-09 12:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for mm: remove nth_page() (rev4) Patchwork
2025-10-09 11:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for mm: remove nth_page() (rev5) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250901150359.867252-12-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.