All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	 Jamie Bainbridge <jamie.bainbridge@gmail.com>,
	Abhishek Rawal <rawal.abhishek92@gmail.com>,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/9] ipv6: snmp: do not use SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL anymore
Date: Fri,  5 Sep 2025 16:58:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905165813.1470708-3-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905165813.1470708-1-edumazet@google.com>

Use ARRAY_SIZE(), so that we know the limit at compile time.

Following patch needs this preliminary change.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
 include/net/ip.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/ipv6/proc.c  | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/ip.h b/include/net/ip.h
index 6dbd2bf8fa9c..a1624e8db1ab 100644
--- a/include/net/ip.h
+++ b/include/net/ip.h
@@ -338,6 +338,19 @@ static inline u64 snmp_fold_field64(void __percpu *mib, int offt, size_t syncp_o
 	} \
 }
 
+#define snmp_get_cpu_field64_batch_cnt(buff64, stats_list, cnt,	\
+				       mib_statistic, offset)	\
+{ \
+	int i, c; \
+	for_each_possible_cpu(c) { \
+		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) \
+			buff64[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field64( \
+					mib_statistic, \
+					c, stats_list[i].entry, \
+					offset); \
+	} \
+}
+
 #define snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, stats_list, mib_statistic) \
 { \
 	int i, c; \
@@ -349,6 +362,17 @@ static inline u64 snmp_fold_field64(void __percpu *mib, int offt, size_t syncp_o
 	} \
 }
 
+#define snmp_get_cpu_field_batch_cnt(buff, stats_list, cnt, mib_statistic) \
+{ \
+	int i, c; \
+	for_each_possible_cpu(c) { \
+		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) \
+			buff[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field( \
+						mib_statistic, \
+						c, stats_list[i].entry); \
+	} \
+}
+
 static inline void inet_get_local_port_range(const struct net *net, int *low, int *high)
 {
 	u32 range = READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.range);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/proc.c b/net/ipv6/proc.c
index e96f14a36834..92ed04729c2f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/proc.c
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_ipstats_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Ip6InECT0Pkts", IPSTATS_MIB_ECT0PKTS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Ip6InCEPkts", IPSTATS_MIB_CEPKTS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Ip6OutTransmits", IPSTATS_MIB_OUTPKTS),
-	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
 static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_icmp6_list[] = {
@@ -96,7 +95,6 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_icmp6_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6OutErrors", ICMP6_MIB_OUTERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6InCsumErrors", ICMP6_MIB_CSUMERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6OutRateLimitHost", ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST),
-	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
 static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_udp6_list[] = {
@@ -109,7 +107,6 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_udp6_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Udp6InCsumErrors", UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Udp6IgnoredMulti", UDP_MIB_IGNOREDMULTI),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Udp6MemErrors", UDP_MIB_MEMERRORS),
-	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
 static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_udplite6_list[] = {
@@ -121,7 +118,6 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_udplite6_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("UdpLite6SndbufErrors", UDP_MIB_SNDBUFERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("UdpLite6InCsumErrors", UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("UdpLite6MemErrors", UDP_MIB_MEMERRORS),
-	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
 static void snmp6_seq_show_icmpv6msg(struct seq_file *seq, atomic_long_t *smib)
@@ -182,35 +178,37 @@ static void snmp6_seq_show_icmpv6msg(struct seq_file *seq, atomic_long_t *smib)
  */
 static void snmp6_seq_show_item(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *pcpumib,
 				atomic_long_t *smib,
-				const struct snmp_mib *itemlist)
+				const struct snmp_mib *itemlist,
+				int cnt)
 {
 	unsigned long buff[SNMP_MIB_MAX];
 	int i;
 
 	if (pcpumib) {
-		memset(buff, 0, sizeof(unsigned long) * SNMP_MIB_MAX);
+		memset(buff, 0, sizeof(unsigned long) * cnt);
 
-		snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, itemlist, pcpumib);
-		for (i = 0; itemlist[i].name; i++)
+		snmp_get_cpu_field_batch_cnt(buff, itemlist, cnt, pcpumib);
+		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
 			seq_printf(seq, "%-32s\t%lu\n",
 				   itemlist[i].name, buff[i]);
 	} else {
-		for (i = 0; itemlist[i].name; i++)
+		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
 			seq_printf(seq, "%-32s\t%lu\n", itemlist[i].name,
 				   atomic_long_read(smib + itemlist[i].entry));
 	}
 }
 
 static void snmp6_seq_show_item64(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *mib,
-				  const struct snmp_mib *itemlist, size_t syncpoff)
+				  const struct snmp_mib *itemlist,
+				  int cnt, size_t syncpoff)
 {
 	u64 buff64[SNMP_MIB_MAX];
 	int i;
 
-	memset(buff64, 0, sizeof(u64) * SNMP_MIB_MAX);
+	memset(buff64, 0, sizeof(u64) * cnt);
 
-	snmp_get_cpu_field64_batch(buff64, itemlist, mib, syncpoff);
-	for (i = 0; itemlist[i].name; i++)
+	snmp_get_cpu_field64_batch_cnt(buff64, itemlist, cnt, mib, syncpoff);
+	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
 		seq_printf(seq, "%-32s\t%llu\n", itemlist[i].name, buff64[i]);
 }
 
@@ -219,14 +217,19 @@ static int snmp6_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	struct net *net = (struct net *)seq->private;
 
 	snmp6_seq_show_item64(seq, net->mib.ipv6_statistics,
-			    snmp6_ipstats_list, offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
+			      snmp6_ipstats_list,
+			      ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_ipstats_list),
+			      offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
 	snmp6_seq_show_item(seq, net->mib.icmpv6_statistics,
-			    NULL, snmp6_icmp6_list);
+			    NULL, snmp6_icmp6_list,
+			    ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_icmp6_list));
 	snmp6_seq_show_icmpv6msg(seq, net->mib.icmpv6msg_statistics->mibs);
 	snmp6_seq_show_item(seq, net->mib.udp_stats_in6,
-			    NULL, snmp6_udp6_list);
+			    NULL, snmp6_udp6_list,
+			    ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_udp6_list));
 	snmp6_seq_show_item(seq, net->mib.udplite_stats_in6,
-			    NULL, snmp6_udplite6_list);
+			    NULL, snmp6_udplite6_list,
+			    ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_udplite6_list));
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -236,9 +239,11 @@ static int snmp6_dev_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 
 	seq_printf(seq, "%-32s\t%u\n", "ifIndex", idev->dev->ifindex);
 	snmp6_seq_show_item64(seq, idev->stats.ipv6,
-			    snmp6_ipstats_list, offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
+			      snmp6_ipstats_list,
+			      ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_ipstats_list),
+			      offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
 	snmp6_seq_show_item(seq, NULL, idev->stats.icmpv6dev->mibs,
-			    snmp6_icmp6_list);
+			    snmp6_icmp6_list, ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_icmp6_list));
 	snmp6_seq_show_icmpv6msg(seq, idev->stats.icmpv6msgdev->mibs);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.51.0.355.g5224444f11-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05 16:58 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] ipv6: snmp: avoid performance issue with RATELIMITHOST Eric Dumazet
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] ipv6: snmp: remove icmp6type2name[] Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:49   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2025-09-08 13:49   ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/9] ipv6: snmp: do not use SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL anymore Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/9] ipv6: snmp: do not track per idev ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST Eric Dumazet
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/9] ipv4: snmp: do not use SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL anymore Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:54   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/9] mptcp: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-06 12:59   ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] sctp: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:56   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-08 15:29   ` Xin Long
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 7/9] tls: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:58   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 8/9] xfrm: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 14:12   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 9/9] net: snmp: remove SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 14:18   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] ipv6: snmp: avoid performance issue with RATELIMITHOST patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250905165813.1470708-3-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jamie.bainbridge@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rawal.abhishek92@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.