From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Jamie Bainbridge <jamie.bainbridge@gmail.com>,
Abhishek Rawal <rawal.abhishek92@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/9] ipv6: snmp: do not track per idev ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 16:58:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905165813.1470708-4-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905165813.1470708-1-edumazet@google.com>
Blamed commit added a critical false sharing on a single
atomic_long_t under DOS, like receiving UDP packets
to closed ports.
Per netns ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST tracking uses per-cpu
storage and is enough, we do not need per-device and slow tracking.
Fixes: d0941130c9351 ("icmp: Add counters for rate limits")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jamie Bainbridge <jamie.bainbridge@gmail.com>
Cc: Abhishek Rawal <rawal.abhishek92@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv6/icmp.c | 3 +--
net/ipv6/proc.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
index 95cdd4cacb00..56c974cf75d1 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -230,8 +230,7 @@ static bool icmpv6_xrlim_allow(struct sock *sk, u8 type,
}
rcu_read_unlock();
if (!res)
- __ICMP6_INC_STATS(net, ip6_dst_idev(dst),
- ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST);
+ __ICMP6_INC_STATS(net, NULL, ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST);
else
icmp_global_consume(net);
dst_release(dst);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/proc.c b/net/ipv6/proc.c
index 92ed04729c2f..73296f38c252 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/proc.c
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_icmp6_list[] = {
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6OutMsgs", ICMP6_MIB_OUTMSGS),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6OutErrors", ICMP6_MIB_OUTERRORS),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6InCsumErrors", ICMP6_MIB_CSUMERRORS),
+/* ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST needs to be last, see snmp6_dev_seq_show(). */
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6OutRateLimitHost", ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST),
};
@@ -242,8 +243,11 @@ static int snmp6_dev_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
snmp6_ipstats_list,
ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_ipstats_list),
offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
+
+ /* Per idev icmp stats do not have ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST */
snmp6_seq_show_item(seq, NULL, idev->stats.icmpv6dev->mibs,
- snmp6_icmp6_list, ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_icmp6_list));
+ snmp6_icmp6_list, ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_icmp6_list) - 1);
+
snmp6_seq_show_icmpv6msg(seq, idev->stats.icmpv6msgdev->mibs);
return 0;
}
--
2.51.0.355.g5224444f11-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-05 16:58 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] ipv6: snmp: avoid performance issue with RATELIMITHOST Eric Dumazet
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] ipv6: snmp: remove icmp6type2name[] Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:49 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/9] ipv6: snmp: do not use SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL anymore Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:49 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/9] ipv4: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:54 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/9] mptcp: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-06 12:59 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] sctp: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:56 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-08 15:29 ` Xin Long
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 7/9] tls: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:58 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 8/9] xfrm: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 14:12 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 9/9] net: snmp: remove SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 14:18 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-09 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] ipv6: snmp: avoid performance issue with RATELIMITHOST patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250905165813.1470708-4-edumazet@google.com \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jamie.bainbridge@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rawal.abhishek92@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.