From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>, Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests: drv-net: Relax total BW check in devlink_rate_tc_bw.py
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:19:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250908131917.10785ce0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0cd98e25-b387-452b-b1a6-414ab20a4cf3@nvidia.com>
On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 22:16:29 +0300 Carolina Jubran wrote:
> However, I’ll also need to extend load.py:
>
> 1. Binding support to ensure traffic flows through the specific VLAN
> interface.
> 2. Interval-based measurement for iperf3 --json to analyze only the
> stable period.
>
> So my plan is:
>
> 1. Send v2 for net to fix the current test with interval-based
> measurement.
> 2. Follow up with a patch to extend load.py with reverse/binding/interval
> support and then migrate the test to use it.
>
> Does that sound good to you?
Sounds too complicated, this is just a stability improvement for a test
which works on single device, and is not exercised / reported upstream.
Let's jump straight to step 2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-31 8:06 [PATCH 0/3] selftests: drv-net: Fix issues in devlink_rate_tc_bw.py Carolina Jubran
2025-08-31 8:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests: drv-net: Fix and clarify TC bandwidth split " Carolina Jubran
2025-09-01 15:45 ` Simon Horman
2025-08-31 8:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests: drv-net: Fix tolerance calculation " Carolina Jubran
2025-09-01 15:45 ` Simon Horman
2025-08-31 8:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests: drv-net: Relax total BW check " Carolina Jubran
2025-09-01 15:46 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-02 23:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-05 22:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-08 19:16 ` Carolina Jubran
2025-09-08 20:19 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-09-09 10:06 ` Carolina Jubran
2025-09-09 21:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250908131917.10785ce0@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noren@nvidia.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.