From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 10/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Use the vCPU attr for setting nr of PMU counters
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:20:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250917212044.294760-11-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917212044.294760-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Configuring the number of implemented counters via PMCR_EL0.N was a bad
idea in retrospect as it interacts poorly with nested. Migrate the
selftest to use the vCPU attribute instead of the KVM_SET_ONE_REG
mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 59 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
index 2a8f31c8e59f..ae36325c022f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/vpmu_counter_access.c
@@ -44,11 +44,6 @@ static uint64_t get_pmcr_n(uint64_t pmcr)
return FIELD_GET(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N, pmcr);
}
-static void set_pmcr_n(uint64_t *pmcr, uint64_t pmcr_n)
-{
- u64p_replace_bits((__u64 *) pmcr, pmcr_n, ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N);
-}
-
static uint64_t get_counters_mask(uint64_t n)
{
uint64_t mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
@@ -414,10 +409,6 @@ static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
.attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ,
.addr = (uint64_t)&irq,
};
- struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = {
- .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
- .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT,
- };
/* The test creates the vpmu_vm multiple times. Ensure a clean state */
memset(&vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm));
@@ -444,9 +435,7 @@ static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP,
"Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver);
- /* Initialize vPMU */
vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr);
- vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr);
}
static void destroy_vpmu_vm(void)
@@ -472,33 +461,28 @@ static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n)
}
}
-static void test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(uint64_t pmcr_n, bool expect_fail)
+static void test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(unsigned int nr_counters, bool expect_fail)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
- uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_orig;
+ unsigned int prev;
+ int ret;
create_vpmu_vm(guest_code);
vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
- pmcr_orig = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0));
- pmcr = pmcr_orig;
+ prev = get_pmcr_n(vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0)));
- /*
- * Setting a larger value of PMCR.N should not modify the field, and
- * return a success.
- */
- set_pmcr_n(&pmcr, pmcr_n);
- vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0), pmcr);
- pmcr = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_PMCR_EL0));
+ ret = __vcpu_device_attr_set(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+ KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_NR_COUNTERS, &nr_counters);
if (expect_fail)
- TEST_ASSERT(pmcr_orig == pmcr,
- "PMCR.N modified by KVM to a larger value (PMCR: 0x%lx) for pmcr_n: 0x%lx",
- pmcr, pmcr_n);
+ TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL,
+ "Setting more PMU counters (%u) than available (%u) unexpectedly succeeded",
+ nr_counters, prev);
else
- TEST_ASSERT(pmcr_n == get_pmcr_n(pmcr),
- "Failed to update PMCR.N to %lu (received: %lu)",
- pmcr_n, get_pmcr_n(pmcr));
+ TEST_ASSERT(!ret, KVM_IOCTL_ERROR(KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, ret));
+
+ vcpu_device_attr_set(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT, NULL);
}
/*
@@ -513,7 +497,7 @@ static void run_access_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
pr_debug("Test with pmcr_n %lu\n", pmcr_n);
- test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(pmcr_n, false);
+ test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(pmcr_n, false);
vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
/* Save the initial sp to restore them later to run the guest again */
@@ -554,7 +538,7 @@ static void run_pmregs_validity_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
uint64_t set_reg_id, clr_reg_id, reg_val;
uint64_t valid_counters_mask, max_counters_mask;
- test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(pmcr_n, false);
+ test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(pmcr_n, false);
vcpu = vpmu_vm.vcpu;
valid_counters_mask = get_counters_mask(pmcr_n);
@@ -608,7 +592,7 @@ static void run_error_test(uint64_t pmcr_n)
{
pr_debug("Error test with pmcr_n %lu (larger than the host)\n", pmcr_n);
- test_create_vpmu_vm_with_pmcr_n(pmcr_n, true);
+ test_create_vpmu_vm_with_nr_counters(pmcr_n, true);
destroy_vpmu_vm();
}
@@ -626,12 +610,25 @@ static uint64_t get_pmcr_n_limit(void)
return get_pmcr_n(pmcr);
}
+static bool kvm_supports_nr_counters_attr(void)
+{
+ bool supported;
+
+ create_vpmu_vm(NULL);
+ supported = !__vcpu_has_device_attr(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
+ KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_NR_COUNTERS);
+ destroy_vpmu_vm();
+
+ return supported;
+}
+
int main(void)
{
uint64_t i, pmcr_n;
TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3));
TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_supports_vgic_v3());
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_supports_nr_counters_attr());
pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n_limit();
for (i = 0; i <= pmcr_n; i++) {
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-17 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-17 21:20 [PATCH 00/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Run selftests in VHE EL2 Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 01/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Provide kvm_arch_vm_post_create() in library code Oliver Upton
2025-09-18 1:25 ` Itaru Kitayama
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Initialize VGICv3 only once Oliver Upton
2025-09-18 10:44 ` Zenghui Yu
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 03/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add helper to check for VGICv3 support Oliver Upton
2025-09-18 1:45 ` Itaru Kitayama
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 04/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add unsanitised helpers for VGICv3 creation Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 05/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Create a VGICv3 for 'default' VMs Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 06/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Alias EL1 registers to EL2 counterparts Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 07/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Provide helper for getting default vCPU target Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:56 ` Itaru Kitayama
2025-09-17 22:00 ` Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 08/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Select SMCCC conduit based on current EL Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 09/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Use hyp timer IRQs when test runs at EL2 Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 11/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Initialize HCR_EL2 Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Enable EL2 by default Oliver Upton
2025-09-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add basic test for running in VHE EL2 Oliver Upton
2025-09-24 18:37 ` [PATCH 00/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Run selftests " Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250917212044.294760-11-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.