From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Martin Uecker <uecker@tugraz.at>,
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
Richard Earnshaw <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>,
Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>,
Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>,
Jim Wilson <jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com>,
Dan Li <ashimida.1990@gmail.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@google.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao@overdrivepizza.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] kcfi: Add core Kernel Control Flow Integrity infrastructure
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:39:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202509181229.FF689207B@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202509171307.DC9740ABAB@keescook>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 02:09:54PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 01:42:32PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote:
> > > On Sep 13, 2025, at 19:23, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > +- Keep indirect calls from being merged (see earlier example) by
> > > + checking the KCFI insn's typeid for equality.
> >
> > Is this resolved by the following code:
> >
> > rtlanal.cc
> > index 63a1d08c46cf..5016fe93ccac 100644
> > --- a/gcc/rtlanal.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/rtlanal.cc
> > @@ -1177,6 +1177,11 @@ reg_referenced_p (const_rtx x, const_rtx body)
> > case IF_THEN_ELSE:
> > return reg_overlap_mentioned_p (x, body);
> >
> > + case KCFI:
> > + /* For KCFI wrapper, check both the wrapped call and the type ID. */
> > + return (reg_overlap_mentioned_p (x, XEXP (body, 0))
> > + || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (x, XEXP (body, 1)));
> > +
>
> The above is needed for accurate register "liveness" checking. When the
> above code is removed, the kcfi-move-preservation.c regression test
> fails (since it doesn't see the clobbers).
>
> AFAICT, simply making it a new type of RTL (the DEF_RTL_EXPR), made it
> unmergeable. I assume this is because whatever was doing the call
> merging was looking strictly for "CALL" types, but I honestly don't know
> where that was happening.
Okay, I've found this. The pass that merged the regression test's calls
is jump2. Specifically, the jump2 pass calls old_insns_match_p() which
compares instruction patterns using rtx_equal_p(), and that is doing it
naturally based on the RTL expression, i.e. matching RTL codes for KCFI,
and then matching format (KCFI defines itself as "ee" format, i.e. 2
expressions):
code = GET_CODE (x);
/* Rtx's of different codes cannot be equal. */
if (code != GET_CODE (y))
return false;
...
fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT (code);
for (i = GET_RTX_LENGTH (code) - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
switch (fmt[i])
{
...
case 'e':
if (!rtx_equal_p (XEXP (x, i), XEXP (y, i), cb))
return false;
break;
So if it's the same call and the same typeid, it'll get merged, otherwise
it won't. And I've validated this now with an addition to the regression
test. It now makes 3 calls, once with typeid A, and then 2 calls with
typeid B, and the typeid B calls get merged.
So there was no special handling for CALL, it's just that CALL didn't have
the typeid associated with it, and KCFI does. RTL working as intended. ;)
(But my new mystery is why my new KCFI matching typeid merging happens
on all backend _except_ arm... I will investigate that.)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-13 23:23 [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce Kernel Control Flow Integrity ABI [PR107048] Kees Cook
2025-09-13 23:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] typeinfo: Introduce KCFI typeinfo mangling API Kees Cook
2025-09-17 17:56 ` Qing Zhao
2025-09-17 21:20 ` Kees Cook
2025-09-18 7:20 ` Martin Uecker
2025-09-18 18:09 ` Kees Cook
2025-09-18 18:40 ` Martin Uecker
2025-09-13 23:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] kcfi: Add core Kernel Control Flow Integrity infrastructure Kees Cook
2025-09-17 13:42 ` Qing Zhao
2025-09-17 21:09 ` Kees Cook
2025-09-18 16:59 ` Qing Zhao
2025-09-18 18:20 ` Kees Cook
2025-09-18 18:48 ` Qing Zhao
2025-09-18 19:20 ` Kees Cook
2025-09-18 19:39 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-09-18 20:14 ` Qing Zhao
2025-09-13 23:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] x86: Add x86_64 Kernel Control Flow Integrity implementation Kees Cook
2025-09-13 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] aarch64: Add AArch64 " Kees Cook
2025-09-13 23:43 ` Andrew Pinski
2025-09-14 19:45 ` Kees Cook
2025-09-14 19:52 ` Andrew Pinski
2025-09-17 20:01 ` Kees Cook
2025-09-13 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm: Add ARM 32-bit " Kees Cook
2025-09-13 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] riscv: Add RISC-V " Kees Cook
2025-09-13 23:24 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] kcfi: Add regression test suite Kees Cook
2025-09-13 23:51 ` Andrew Pinski
2025-09-17 19:51 ` Kees Cook
2025-09-13 23:58 ` Andrew Pinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202509181229.FF689207B@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@sifive.com \
--cc=ashimida.1990@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=joao@overdrivepizza.com \
--cc=josmyers@redhat.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcus.shawcroft@arm.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
--cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
--cc=rcvalle@google.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=uecker@tugraz.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.