From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Cc: jpoimboe@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool/x86: Fix NOP decode
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 12:03:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925100323.GY4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f17d5e92-2aaa-43e7-ba67-ea5e7d07601a@oracle.com>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 11:55:23AM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>
> On 9/24/25 20:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 07:34:00PM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/24/25 15:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > For x86_64 the kernel consistently uses 2 instructions for all NOPs:
> > > >
> > > > 90 - NOP
> > > > 0f 1f /0 - NOPL
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Notably:
> > > >
> > > > - REP NOP is PAUSE, not a NOP instruction.
> > > >
> > > > - 0f {0c...0f} is reserved space,
> > > > except for 0f 0d /1, which is PREFETCHW, not a NOP.
> > > >
> > > > - 0f {19,1c...1f} is reserved space,
> > > > except for 0f 1f /0, which is NOPL.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
> > > > @@ -494,7 +494,8 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct objto
> > > > break;
> > > > case 0x90:
> > > > + if (prefix != 0xf3) /* REP NOP := PAUSE */
> > > > + insn->type = INSN_NOP;
> > > > break;
> > >
> > > So this covers NOP1 (0x90) and NOP2 (0x66 0x90), right?
> >
> > Yes. Everything with opcode 0x90, except 0xf3 0x90, which as stated is
> > PAUSE.
> >
>
> What about 0x49 0x90, which is xchg (XCHG r8,rAX) ?
Ooh, that is a nice one. Yes, that needs fixing. Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 13:45 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Few x86 decoder updates Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool/x86: Remove 0xea hack Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] objtool/x86: Add UDB support Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:56 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool/x86: Fix NOP decode Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 17:34 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-24 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-25 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-09-25 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 11:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-09-25 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 13:04 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-25 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 13:05 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250925100323.GY4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.