From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: alexandre.chartre@oracle.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool/x86: Fix NOP decode
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:43:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925124332.GA3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2f6775f-0be5-401b-bc01-effd3f428482@citrix.com>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 12:29:18PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > I've made that:
> >
> > case 0x90:
> > if (rex_b) /* XCHG %r8, %rax */
> > break;
> >
> > if (prefix == 0xf3) /* REP NOP := PAUSE */
> > break;
> >
> > insn->type = INSN_NOP;
> > break;
>
> Legacy prefixes can come in any order. What is F3 66 90 ?
>
> Also, VEX/EVEX/REX2 want excluding too, all of which can encode rex_b
> differently.
So luckily objtool only really cares about instructions as found in the
kernel text. Neither f3 66 90 nor VEX/EVEX/REX2 prefixes are of much
concern.
But yes.. I happen to have an insn_is_nop() function that can be used on
userspace, and that certainly wants to be taught about these... x86 is
such a pain :/
> Is it really only rex_b which prevents NOP becoming a pause, or is it
> any REX prefix? I would have thought it was any REX prefix.
SDM opcode table and instruction reference seems consistent with f3
only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 13:45 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Few x86 decoder updates Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool/x86: Remove 0xea hack Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] objtool/x86: Add UDB support Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:56 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool/x86: Fix NOP decode Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-24 17:34 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-24 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 9:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-25 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 11:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-09-25 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-09-25 13:04 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-09-25 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-25 13:05 ` Alexandre Chartre
2025-10-14 11:47 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250925124332.GA3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.