All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 Leon Hwang
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function Leon Hwang
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
	deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot

This patch set introduces the BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for
percpu maps, as the requirement of BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag for percpu_array
maps was discussed in the thread of
"[PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] bpf: Introduce global percpu data"[1].

The goal of BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag is to reduce data caching overhead in light
skeletons by allowing a single value to be reused to update values across all
CPUs. This avoids the M:N problem where M cached values are used to update a
map on N CPUs kernel.

The BPF_F_CPU flag is accompanied by *flags*-embedded cpu info, which
specifies the target CPU for the operation:

* For lookup operations: the flag field alongside cpu info enable querying
  a value on the specified CPU.
* For update operations: the flag field alongside cpu info enable
  updating value for specified CPU.

Links:
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250526162146.24429-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

Changes:
v8 -> v9:
* Change value type from u64 to u32 in selftests.
* Address comments from Andrii:
  * Keep value_size unaligned and update everywhere for consistency when
    cpu flags are specified.
  * Update value by getting pointer for percpu hash and percpu
    cgroup_storage maps.

v7 -> v8:
* Address comments from Andrii:
  * Check BPF_F_LOCK when update percpu_array, percpu_hash and
    lru_percpu_hash maps.
  * Refactor flags check in __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch().
  * Keep value_size unaligned and copy value using copy_map_value() in
    __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch() when BPF_F_CPU is specified.
  * Update warn message in libbpf's validate_map_op().
  * Update comment of libbpf's bpf_map__lookup_elem().

v6 -> v7:
* Get correct value size for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash in
  update_batch API.
* Set 'count' as 'max_entries' in test cases for lookup_batch API.
* Address comment from Alexei:
  * Move cpu flags check into bpf_map_check_op_flags().

v5 -> v6:
* Move bpf_map_check_op_flags() from 'bpf.h' to 'syscall.c'.
* Address comments from Alexei:
  * Drop the refactoring code of data copying logic for percpu maps.
  * Drop bpf_map_check_op_flags() wrappers.

v4 -> v5:
* Address comments from Andrii:
  * Refactor data copying logic for all percpu maps.
  * Drop this_cpu_ptr() micro-optimization.
  * Drop cpu check in libbpf's validate_map_op().
  * Enhance bpf_map_check_op_flags() using *allowed flags* instead of
    'extra_flags_mask'.

v3 -> v4:
* Address comments from Andrii:
  * Remove unnecessary map_type check in bpf_map_value_size().
  * Reduce code churn.
  * Remove unnecessary do_delete check in
    __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch().
  * Introduce bpf_percpu_copy_to_user() and bpf_percpu_copy_from_user().
  * Rename check_map_flags() to bpf_map_check_op_flags() with
    extra_flags_mask.
  * Add human-readable pr_warn() explanations in validate_map_op().
  * Use flags in bpf_map__delete_elem() and
    bpf_map__lookup_and_delete_elem().
  * Drop "for alignment reasons".
v3 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250821160817.70285-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

v2 -> v3:
* Address comments from Alexei:
  * Use BPF_F_ALL_CPUS instead of BPF_ALL_CPUS magic.
  * Introduce these two cpu flags for all percpu maps.
* Address comments from Jiri:
  * Reduce some unnecessary u32 cast.
  * Refactor more generic map flags check function.
  * A code style issue.
v2 link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250805163017.17015-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

v1 -> v2:
* Address comments from Andrii:
  * Embed cpu info as high 32 bits of *flags* totally.
  * Use ERANGE instead of E2BIG.
  * Few format issues.

Leon Hwang (7):
  bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function
  bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags
  bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array
    maps
  bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash
    and lru_percpu_hash maps
  bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for
    percpu_cgroup_storage maps
  libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps
  selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags

 include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h                    |   4 +-
 include/linux/bpf.h                           |  44 +++-
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   2 +
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c                         |  25 +-
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          |  82 ++++--
 kernel/bpf/local_storage.c                    |  27 +-
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          |  65 ++---
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   2 +
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h                           |   8 +
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        |  26 +-
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        |  21 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c   | 248 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c  |  32 +++
 13 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)

--
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function
  2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
	deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot

It is to unify map flags checking for lookup_elem, update_elem,
lookup_batch and update_batch APIs.

Therefore, it will be convenient to check BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS
flags in it for these APIs in next patch.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h  | 11 +++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 34 +++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index a98c833461347..fb48db5bde472 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3768,4 +3768,15 @@ int bpf_prog_get_file_line(struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long ip, const char *
 			   const char **linep, int *nump);
 struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_find_from_stack(void);
 
+static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
+{
+	if (flags & ~allowed_flags)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if ((flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index a48fa86f82a7f..6c252d3337928 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1709,9 +1709,6 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (attr->flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	CLASS(fd, f)(attr->map_fd);
 	map = __bpf_map_get(f);
 	if (IS_ERR(map))
@@ -1719,9 +1716,9 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (!(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_READ))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	if ((attr->flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	key = __bpf_copy_key(ukey, map->key_size);
 	if (IS_ERR(key))
@@ -1784,11 +1781,9 @@ static int map_update_elem(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 		goto err_put;
 	}
 
-	if ((attr->flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)) {
-		err = -EINVAL;
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, ~0);
+	if (err)
 		goto err_put;
-	}
 
 	key = ___bpf_copy_key(ukey, map->key_size);
 	if (IS_ERR(key)) {
@@ -1992,13 +1987,9 @@ int generic_map_update_batch(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file,
 	void *key, *value;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)) {
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
 
@@ -2055,12 +2046,9 @@ int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	u32 value_size, cp, max_count;
 	int err;
 
-	if (attr->batch.elem_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if ((attr->batch.elem_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) &&
-	    !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
 
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags
  2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
	deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot

Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags and check them for
following APIs:

* 'map_lookup_elem()'
* 'map_update_elem()'
* 'generic_map_lookup_batch()'
* 'generic_map_update_batch()'

And, get the correct value size for these APIs.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h            | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  2 ++
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c           | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index fb48db5bde472..731de0efdd00e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3768,14 +3768,35 @@ int bpf_prog_get_file_line(struct bpf_prog *prog, unsigned long ip, const char *
 			   const char **linep, int *nump);
 struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_find_from_stack(void);
 
+static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
 {
-	if (flags & ~allowed_flags)
+	u32 cpu;
+
+	if ((u32)flags & ~allowed_flags)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if ((flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (!(flags & BPF_F_CPU) && flags >> 32)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) {
+		if (!bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(map->map_type))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		if ((flags & BPF_F_CPU) && (flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		cpu = flags >> 32;
+		if ((flags & BPF_F_CPU) && cpu >= num_possible_cpus())
+			return -ERANGE;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index ae83d8649ef1c..f827353424ec5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1372,6 +1372,8 @@ enum {
 	BPF_NOEXIST	= 1, /* create new element if it didn't exist */
 	BPF_EXIST	= 2, /* update existing element */
 	BPF_F_LOCK	= 4, /* spin_lock-ed map_lookup/map_update */
+	BPF_F_CPU	= 8, /* cpu flag for percpu maps, upper 32-bit of flags is a cpu number */
+	BPF_F_ALL_CPUS	= 16, /* update value across all CPUs for percpu maps */
 };
 
 /* flags for BPF_MAP_CREATE command */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 6c252d3337928..8c206d46de3f5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -133,12 +133,14 @@ bool bpf_map_write_active(const struct bpf_map *map)
 	return atomic64_read(&map->writecnt) != 0;
 }
 
-static u32 bpf_map_value_size(const struct bpf_map *map)
-{
-	if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
-	    map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH ||
-	    map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY ||
-	    map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE)
+static u32 bpf_map_value_size(const struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags)
+{
+	if (flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
+		return map->value_size;
+	else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
+		 map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH ||
+		 map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY ||
+		 map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE)
 		return round_up(map->value_size, 8) * num_possible_cpus();
 	else if (IS_FD_MAP(map))
 		return sizeof(u32);
@@ -1716,7 +1718,7 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (!(map_get_sys_perms(map, f) & FMODE_CAN_READ))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->flags, BPF_F_LOCK | BPF_F_CPU);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -1724,7 +1726,7 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (IS_ERR(key))
 		return PTR_ERR(key);
 
-	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, attr->flags);
 
 	err = -ENOMEM;
 	value = kvmalloc(value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
@@ -1791,7 +1793,7 @@ static int map_update_elem(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
 		goto err_put;
 	}
 
-	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, attr->flags);
 	value = kvmemdup_bpfptr(uvalue, value_size);
 	if (IS_ERR(value)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(value);
@@ -1987,11 +1989,12 @@ int generic_map_update_batch(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file,
 	void *key, *value;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags,
+				     BPF_F_LOCK | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, attr->batch.elem_flags);
 
 	max_count = attr->batch.count;
 	if (!max_count)
@@ -2046,11 +2049,11 @@ int generic_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	u32 value_size, cp, max_count;
 	int err;
 
-	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK);
+	err = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, attr->batch.elem_flags, BPF_F_LOCK | BPF_F_CPU);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, attr->batch.elem_flags);
 
 	max_count = attr->batch.count;
 	if (!max_count)
@@ -2172,7 +2175,7 @@ static int map_lookup_and_delete_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		goto err_put;
 	}
 
-	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
+	value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map, 0);
 
 	err = -ENOMEM;
 	value = kvmalloc(value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index ae83d8649ef1c..f827353424ec5 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1372,6 +1372,8 @@ enum {
 	BPF_NOEXIST	= 1, /* create new element if it didn't exist */
 	BPF_EXIST	= 2, /* update existing element */
 	BPF_F_LOCK	= 4, /* spin_lock-ed map_lookup/map_update */
+	BPF_F_CPU	= 8, /* cpu flag for percpu maps, upper 32-bit of flags is a cpu number */
+	BPF_F_ALL_CPUS	= 16, /* update value across all CPUs for percpu maps */
 };
 
 /* flags for BPF_MAP_CREATE command */
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps
  2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function Leon Hwang
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
	deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot

Introduce support for the BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag in percpu_array maps to
allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
update_elem and update_batch APIs.

Introduce support for the BPF_F_CPU flag in percpu_array maps to allow:

* update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
APIs.
* lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
APIs.

The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:

* map_flags of lookup_elem and update_elem APIs along with embedded cpu
info.
* elem_flags of lookup_batch and update_batch APIs along with embedded
cpu info.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h   |  9 +++++++--
 kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c  |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 731de0efdd00e..31498b445b447 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				   struct bpf_func_state *callee);
 
 int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
-int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
+int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
 int bpf_percpu_hash_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 			   u64 flags);
 int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
@@ -3770,7 +3770,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_find_from_stack(void);
 
 static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
 {
-	return false;
+	switch (map_type) {
+	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
 }
 
 static inline int bpf_map_check_op_flags(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, u64 allowed_flags)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
index 80b1765a31596..78e590ffd2a62 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static void *percpu_array_map_lookup_percpu_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	return per_cpu_ptr(array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask], cpu);
 }
 
-int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
+int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 map_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
 	u32 index = *(u32 *)key;
@@ -325,11 +325,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
 	size = array->elem_size;
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	pptr = array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask];
+	if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+		cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+		copy_map_value(map, value, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+		check_and_init_map_value(map, value);
+		goto unlock;
+	}
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		copy_map_value_long(map, value + off, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
 		check_and_init_map_value(map, value + off);
 		off += size;
 	}
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -399,10 +406,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 	struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
 	u32 index = *(u32 *)key;
 	void __percpu *pptr;
-	int cpu, off = 0;
+	void *ptr;
 	u32 size;
+	int cpu;
 
-	if (unlikely(map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
+	if (unlikely((map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) || (u32)map_flags > BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -423,11 +431,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 	size = array->elem_size;
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	pptr = array->pptrs[index & array->index_mask];
+	if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+		cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+		copy_map_value(map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value);
+		bpf_obj_free_fields(array->map.record, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+		goto unlock;
+	}
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		copy_map_value_long(map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
+		ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
+		copy_map_value(map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr);
 		bpf_obj_free_fields(array->map.record, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
-		off += size;
 	}
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 8c206d46de3f5..f8de1433fdffb 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 	    map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) {
 		err = bpf_percpu_hash_copy(map, key, value);
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
-		err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value);
+		err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value, flags);
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE) {
 		err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value);
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE) {
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps
  2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
  2025-10-06 22:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
	deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot

Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
maps to allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
update_elem and update_batch APIs.

Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
maps to allow:

* update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
APIs.
* lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
APIs.

The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:

* map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
* elem_flags along with embedded cpu info.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h  |  4 ++-
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 31498b445b447..b3d9a584f34e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 				   struct bpf_func_state *caller,
 				   struct bpf_func_state *callee);
 
-int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
+int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
 int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
 int bpf_percpu_hash_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 			   u64 flags);
@@ -3772,6 +3772,8 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
 {
 	switch (map_type) {
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
+	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH:
+	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
 		return true;
 	default:
 		return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index c2fcd0cd51e51..6fb28ba2406c4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -945,24 +945,32 @@ static void free_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
 }
 
 static void pcpu_copy_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
-			    void *value, bool onallcpus)
+			    void *value, bool onallcpus, u64 map_flags)
 {
 	if (!onallcpus) {
 		/* copy true value_size bytes */
 		copy_map_value(&htab->map, this_cpu_ptr(pptr), value);
 	} else {
-		u32 size = round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
-		int off = 0, cpu;
+		u32 size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ?
+			htab->map.value_size : round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
+		void *ptr;
+		int cpu;
+
+		if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+			cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+			memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value, size);
+			return;
+		}
 
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-			copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
-			off += size;
+			ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
+			memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr, size);
 		}
 	}
 }
 
 static void pcpu_init_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
-			    void *value, bool onallcpus)
+			    void *value, bool onallcpus, u64 map_flags)
 {
 	/* When not setting the initial value on all cpus, zero-fill element
 	 * values for other cpus. Otherwise, bpf program has no way to ensure
@@ -980,7 +988,7 @@ static void pcpu_init_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
 				zero_map_value(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
 		}
 	} else {
-		pcpu_copy_value(htab, pptr, value, onallcpus);
+		pcpu_copy_value(htab, pptr, value, onallcpus, map_flags);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -992,7 +1000,7 @@ static bool fd_htab_map_needs_adjust(const struct bpf_htab *htab)
 static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
 					 void *value, u32 key_size, u32 hash,
 					 bool percpu, bool onallcpus,
-					 struct htab_elem *old_elem)
+					 struct htab_elem *old_elem, u64 map_flags)
 {
 	u32 size = htab->map.value_size;
 	bool prealloc = htab_is_prealloc(htab);
@@ -1050,7 +1058,7 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
 			pptr = *(void __percpu **)ptr;
 		}
 
-		pcpu_init_value(htab, pptr, value, onallcpus);
+		pcpu_init_value(htab, pptr, value, onallcpus, map_flags);
 
 		if (!prealloc)
 			htab_elem_set_ptr(l_new, key_size, pptr);
@@ -1155,7 +1163,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 	}
 
 	l_new = alloc_htab_elem(htab, key, value, key_size, hash, false, false,
-				l_old);
+				l_old, map_flags);
 	if (IS_ERR(l_new)) {
 		/* all pre-allocated elements are in use or memory exhausted */
 		ret = PTR_ERR(l_new);
@@ -1271,9 +1279,11 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem_in_place(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	u32 key_size, hash;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (unlikely(map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
+	if (unlikely(!onallcpus && map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
+	if (unlikely(onallcpus && ((map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) || (u32)map_flags > BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
 		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
@@ -1299,7 +1309,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem_in_place(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		/* Update value in-place */
 		if (percpu) {
 			pcpu_copy_value(htab, htab_elem_get_ptr(l_old, key_size),
-					value, onallcpus);
+					value, onallcpus, map_flags);
 		} else {
 			void **inner_map_pptr = htab_elem_value(l_old, key_size);
 
@@ -1308,7 +1318,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem_in_place(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		}
 	} else {
 		l_new = alloc_htab_elem(htab, key, value, key_size,
-					hash, percpu, onallcpus, NULL);
+					hash, percpu, onallcpus, NULL, map_flags);
 		if (IS_ERR(l_new)) {
 			ret = PTR_ERR(l_new);
 			goto err;
@@ -1334,9 +1344,11 @@ static long __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	u32 key_size, hash;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (unlikely(map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
+	if (unlikely(!onallcpus && map_flags > BPF_EXIST))
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
+	if (unlikely(onallcpus && ((map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) || (u32)map_flags > BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
 		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
@@ -1374,10 +1386,10 @@ static long __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 
 		/* per-cpu hash map can update value in-place */
 		pcpu_copy_value(htab, htab_elem_get_ptr(l_old, key_size),
-				value, onallcpus);
+				value, onallcpus, map_flags);
 	} else {
 		pcpu_init_value(htab, htab_elem_get_ptr(l_new, key_size),
-				value, onallcpus);
+				value, onallcpus, map_flags);
 		hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&l_new->hash_node, head);
 		l_new = NULL;
 	}
@@ -1689,9 +1701,9 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	void __user *ukeys = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.keys);
 	void __user *ubatch = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.in_batch);
 	u32 batch, max_count, size, bucket_size, map_id;
+	u64 elem_map_flags, map_flags, allowed_flags;
 	u32 bucket_cnt, total, key_size, value_size;
 	struct htab_elem *node_to_free = NULL;
-	u64 elem_map_flags, map_flags;
 	struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
 	struct hlist_nulls_node *n;
 	unsigned long flags = 0;
@@ -1701,9 +1713,12 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	elem_map_flags = attr->batch.elem_flags;
-	if ((elem_map_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK) ||
-	    ((elem_map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && !btf_record_has_field(map->record, BPF_SPIN_LOCK)))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	allowed_flags = BPF_F_LOCK;
+	if (!do_delete && is_percpu)
+		allowed_flags |= BPF_F_CPU;
+	ret = bpf_map_check_op_flags(map, elem_map_flags, allowed_flags);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	map_flags = attr->batch.flags;
 	if (map_flags)
@@ -1726,7 +1741,7 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 	key_size = htab->map.key_size;
 	value_size = htab->map.value_size;
 	size = round_up(value_size, 8);
-	if (is_percpu)
+	if (is_percpu && !(elem_map_flags & BPF_F_CPU))
 		value_size = size * num_possible_cpus();
 	total = 0;
 	/* while experimenting with hash tables with sizes ranging from 10 to
@@ -1809,10 +1824,17 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
 			void __percpu *pptr;
 
 			pptr = htab_elem_get_ptr(l, map->key_size);
-			for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-				copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, dst_val + off, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
-				check_and_init_map_value(&htab->map, dst_val + off);
-				off += size;
+			if (elem_map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+				cpu = elem_map_flags >> 32;
+				copy_map_value(&htab->map, dst_val, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+				check_and_init_map_value(&htab->map, dst_val);
+			} else {
+				for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+					copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, dst_val + off,
+							    per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+					check_and_init_map_value(&htab->map, dst_val + off);
+					off += size;
+				}
 			}
 		} else {
 			value = htab_elem_value(l, key_size);
@@ -2368,7 +2390,7 @@ static void *htab_lru_percpu_map_lookup_percpu_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *k
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
+int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 map_flags)
 {
 	struct htab_elem *l;
 	void __percpu *pptr;
@@ -2385,16 +2407,22 @@ int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
 	l = __htab_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
 	if (!l)
 		goto out;
+	ret = 0;
 	/* We do not mark LRU map element here in order to not mess up
 	 * eviction heuristics when user space does a map walk.
 	 */
 	pptr = htab_elem_get_ptr(l, map->key_size);
+	if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+		cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+		copy_map_value(map, value, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
+		check_and_init_map_value(map, value);
+		goto out;
+	}
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		copy_map_value_long(map, value + off, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu));
 		check_and_init_map_value(map, value + off);
 		off += size;
 	}
-	ret = 0;
 out:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return ret;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index f8de1433fdffb..ce525a474656a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 	bpf_disable_instrumentation();
 	if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
 	    map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) {
-		err = bpf_percpu_hash_copy(map, key, value);
+		err = bpf_percpu_hash_copy(map, key, value, flags);
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
 		err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value, flags);
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE) {
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps
  2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
  2025-10-06 22:33   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps Leon Hwang
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
  6 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
	deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot

Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for update_elem
API.

Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
allow:

* update value for specified CPU for update_elem API.
* lookup value for specified CPU for lookup_elem API.

The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via map_flags along with embedded cpu info.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h |  4 ++--
 include/linux/bpf.h        |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c       |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
index aedf573bdb426..013f4db9903fd 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void bpf_cgroup_storage_link(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage,
 void bpf_cgroup_storage_unlink(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage);
 int bpf_cgroup_storage_assign(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux, struct bpf_map *map);
 
-int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
+int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
 int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 				     void *value, u64 flags);
 
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static inline struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(
 static inline void bpf_cgroup_storage_free(
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage) {}
 static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
-						 void *value) {
+						 void *value, u64 flags) {
 	return 0;
 }
 static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map,
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index b3d9a584f34e2..6250804394b53 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3774,6 +3774,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
+	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE:
 		return true;
 	default:
 		return false;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index c93a756e035c0..f5188e0afa478 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static long cgroup_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 }
 
 int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
-				   void *value)
+				   void *value, u64 map_flags)
 {
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
@@ -198,12 +198,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
 	 * access 'value_size' of them, so copying rounded areas
 	 * will not leak any kernel data
 	 */
+	if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+		cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+		memcpy(value, per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), _map->value_size);
+		goto unlock;
+	}
 	size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		bpf_long_memcpy(value + off,
 				per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), size);
 		off += size;
 	}
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -213,10 +219,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
 {
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
-	int cpu, off = 0;
+	void *ptr;
 	u32 size;
+	int cpu;
 
-	if (map_flags != BPF_ANY && map_flags != BPF_EXIST)
+	if ((u32)map_flags & ~(BPF_ANY | BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
@@ -232,12 +239,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
 	 * returned or zeros which were zero-filled by percpu_alloc,
 	 * so no kernel data leaks possible
 	 */
-	size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
+	size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ? _map->value_size :
+		round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
+	if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
+		cpu = map_flags >> 32;
+		memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), value, size);
+		goto unlock;
+	}
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		bpf_long_memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu),
-				value + off, size);
-		off += size;
+		ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
+		memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), ptr, size);
 	}
+unlock:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index ce525a474656a..b654115c99e01 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
 		err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value, flags);
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE) {
-		err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value);
+		err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value, flags);
 	} else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE) {
 		err = bpf_stackmap_extract(map, key, value, false);
 	} else if (IS_FD_ARRAY(map) || IS_FD_PROG_ARRAY(map)) {
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps
  2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
	deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot

Add libbpf support for the BPF_F_CPU flag for percpu maps by embedding the
cpu info into the high 32 bits of:

1. **flags**: bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(), bpf_map__lookup_elem(),
   bpf_map_update_elem() and bpf_map__update_elem()
2. **opts->elem_flags**: bpf_map_lookup_batch() and
   bpf_map_update_batch()

And the flag can be BPF_F_ALL_CPUS, but cannot be
'BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS'.

Behavior:

* If the flag is BPF_F_ALL_CPUS, the update is applied across all CPUs.
* If the flag is BPF_F_CPU, it updates value only to the specified CPU.
* If the flag is BPF_F_CPU, lookup value only from the specified CPU.
* lookup does not support BPF_F_ALL_CPUS.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h    |  8 ++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 21 ++++++++-------------
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
index e983a3e40d612..ffd93feffd71d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h
@@ -289,6 +289,14 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(int fd, void *in_batch,
  *    Update spin_lock-ed map elements. This must be
  *    specified if the map value contains a spinlock.
  *
+ * **BPF_F_CPU**
+ *    As for percpu maps, update value on the specified CPU. And the cpu
+ *    info is embedded into the high 32 bits of **opts->elem_flags**.
+ *
+ * **BPF_F_ALL_CPUS**
+ *    As for percpu maps, update value across all CPUs. This flag cannot
+ *    be used with BPF_F_CPU at the same time.
+ *
  * @param fd BPF map file descriptor
  * @param keys pointer to an array of *count* keys
  * @param values pointer to an array of *count* values
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index f92083f51bdb3..4f73a54c0a81f 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -10671,7 +10671,7 @@ bpf_object__find_map_fd_by_name(const struct bpf_object *obj, const char *name)
 }
 
 static int validate_map_op(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t key_sz,
-			   size_t value_sz, bool check_value_sz)
+			   size_t value_sz, bool check_value_sz, __u64 flags)
 {
 	if (!map_is_created(map)) /* map is not yet created */
 		return -ENOENT;
@@ -10698,6 +10698,20 @@ static int validate_map_op(const struct bpf_map *map, size_t key_sz,
 		int num_cpu = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
 		size_t elem_sz = roundup(map->def.value_size, 8);
 
+		if (flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) {
+			if ((flags & BPF_F_CPU) && (flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) {
+				pr_warn("map '%s': BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS are mutually exclusive\n",
+					map->name);
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+			if (map->def.value_size != value_sz) {
+				pr_warn("map '%s': unexpected value size %zu provided for either BPF_F_CPU or BPF_F_ALL_CPUS, expected %u\n",
+					map->name, value_sz, map->def.value_size);
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+			break;
+		}
+
 		if (value_sz != num_cpu * elem_sz) {
 			pr_warn("map '%s': unexpected value size %zu provided for per-CPU map, expected %d * %zu = %zd\n",
 				map->name, value_sz, num_cpu, elem_sz, num_cpu * elem_sz);
@@ -10722,7 +10736,7 @@ int bpf_map__lookup_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true, flags);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
@@ -10735,7 +10749,7 @@ int bpf_map__update_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true, flags);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
@@ -10747,7 +10761,7 @@ int bpf_map__delete_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */, flags);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
@@ -10760,7 +10774,7 @@ int bpf_map__lookup_and_delete_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, value_sz, true, flags);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
@@ -10772,7 +10786,7 @@ int bpf_map__get_next_key(const struct bpf_map *map,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */);
+	err = validate_map_op(map, key_sz, 0, false /* check_value_sz */, 0);
 	if (err)
 		return libbpf_err(err);
 
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 5118d0a90e243..7c38b2e546080 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -1196,12 +1196,13 @@ LIBBPF_API struct bpf_map *bpf_map__inner_map(struct bpf_map *map);
  * @param key_sz size in bytes of key data, needs to match BPF map definition's **key_size**
  * @param value pointer to memory in which looked up value will be stored
  * @param value_sz size in byte of value data memory; it has to match BPF map
- * definition's **value_size**. For per-CPU BPF maps value size has to be
- * a product of BPF map value size and number of possible CPUs in the system
- * (could be fetched with **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()**). Note also that for
- * per-CPU values value size has to be aligned up to closest 8 bytes for
- * alignment reasons, so expected size is: `round_up(value_size, 8)
- * * libbpf_num_possible_cpus()`.
+ * definition's **value_size**. For per-CPU BPF maps, value size can be
+ * `value_size` if either **BPF_F_CPU** or **BPF_F_ALL_CPUS** is specified
+ * in **flags**, otherwise a product of BPF map value size and number of
+ * possible CPUs in the system (could be fetched with
+ * **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()**). Note also that for per-CPU values value
+ * size has to be aligned up to closest 8 bytes, so expected size is:
+ * `round_up(value_size, 8) * libbpf_num_possible_cpus()`.
  * @flags extra flags passed to kernel for this operation
  * @return 0, on success; negative error, otherwise
  *
@@ -1219,13 +1220,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_map__lookup_elem(const struct bpf_map *map,
  * @param key pointer to memory containing bytes of the key
  * @param key_sz size in bytes of key data, needs to match BPF map definition's **key_size**
  * @param value pointer to memory containing bytes of the value
- * @param value_sz size in byte of value data memory; it has to match BPF map
- * definition's **value_size**. For per-CPU BPF maps value size has to be
- * a product of BPF map value size and number of possible CPUs in the system
- * (could be fetched with **libbpf_num_possible_cpus()**). Note also that for
- * per-CPU values value size has to be aligned up to closest 8 bytes for
- * alignment reasons, so expected size is: `round_up(value_size, 8)
- * * libbpf_num_possible_cpus()`.
+ * @param value_sz refer to **bpf_map__lookup_elem**'s description.'
  * @flags extra flags passed to kernel for this operation
  * @return 0, on success; negative error, otherwise
  *
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags
  2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-09-30 15:39 ` Leon Hwang
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-09-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf
  Cc: ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87, dxu,
	deso, leon.hwang, kernel-patches-bot

Add test coverage for the new BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support
in percpu maps. The following APIs are exercised:

* bpf_map_update_batch()
* bpf_map_lookup_batch()
* bpf_map_update_elem()
* bpf_map__update_elem()
* bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags()
* bpf_map__lookup_elem()

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c   | 248 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c  |  32 +++
 2 files changed, 280 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c
index 343da65864d6d..06e16cd646176 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/percpu_alloc.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
+#include "cgroup_helpers.h"
 #include "percpu_alloc_array.skel.h"
 #include "percpu_alloc_cgrp_local_storage.skel.h"
 #include "percpu_alloc_fail.skel.h"
@@ -115,6 +116,245 @@ static void test_failure(void) {
 	RUN_TESTS(percpu_alloc_fail);
 }
 
+static void test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag(struct bpf_map *map, void *keys, size_t key_sz,
+					u32 max_entries, bool test_batch)
+{
+	size_t value_sz = sizeof(u32), value_sz_cpus, value_sz_total;
+	u32 *values = NULL, *values_percpu = NULL;
+	int i, j, cpu, map_fd, nr_cpus, err;
+	const u32 value = 0xDEADC0DE;
+	u32 count = max_entries, v;
+	u64 batch = 0, flags;
+	void *values_row;
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_batch_opts, batch_opts);
+
+	nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(nr_cpus, 0, "libbpf_num_possible_cpus"))
+		return;
+
+	value_sz_cpus = value_sz * nr_cpus;
+	values = calloc(max_entries, value_sz_cpus);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(values, "calloc values"))
+		return;
+
+	values_percpu = calloc(max_entries, roundup(value_sz, 8) * nr_cpus);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(values_percpu, "calloc values_percpu")) {
+		free(values);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	value_sz_total = value_sz_cpus * max_entries;
+	memset(values, 0, value_sz_total);
+
+	map_fd = bpf_map__fd(map);
+	flags = BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;
+	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags err"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+	if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_update_elem err"))
+		goto out;
+
+	flags = (u64)nr_cpus << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_update_elem -ERANGE"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map__update_elem -ERANGE"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags(map_fd, keys, values, flags);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_lookup_elem_flags -ERANGE"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, keys, key_sz, values, value_sz, flags);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map__lookup_elem -ERANGE"))
+		goto out;
+
+	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
+		/* clear value on all cpus */
+		values[0] = 0;
+		flags = BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;
+		for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+			err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys + i * key_sz, key_sz, values,
+						   value_sz, flags);
+			if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__update_elem all_cpus"))
+				goto out;
+		}
+
+		/* update value on specified cpu */
+		for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+			values[0] = value;
+			flags = (u64)cpu << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+			err = bpf_map__update_elem(map, keys + i * key_sz, key_sz, values,
+						   value_sz, flags);
+			if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__update_elem specified cpu"))
+				goto out;
+
+			/* lookup then check value on CPUs */
+			for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) {
+				flags = (u64)j << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+				err = bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, keys + i * key_sz, key_sz, values,
+							   value_sz, flags);
+				if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map__lookup_elem specified cpu"))
+					goto out;
+				if (!ASSERT_EQ(values[0], j != cpu ? 0 : value,
+					       "bpf_map__lookup_elem value on specified cpu"))
+					goto out;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!test_batch)
+		goto out;
+
+	batch_opts.elem_flags = (u64)nr_cpus << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+	err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, -ERANGE, "bpf_map_update_batch -ERANGE"))
+		goto out;
+
+	for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
+		memset(values, 0, value_sz_total);
+
+		/* clear values across all CPUs */
+		batch_opts.elem_flags = BPF_F_ALL_CPUS;
+		err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch all_cpus"))
+			goto out;
+
+		/* update values on specified CPU */
+		for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++)
+			values[i] = value;
+
+		batch_opts.elem_flags = (u64)cpu << 32 | BPF_F_CPU;
+		err = bpf_map_update_batch(map_fd, keys, values, &max_entries, &batch_opts);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_update_batch specified cpu"))
+			goto out;
+
+		/* lookup values on specified CPU */
+		memset(values, 0, max_entries * value_sz);
+		err = bpf_map_lookup_batch(map_fd, NULL, &batch, keys, values, &count, &batch_opts);
+		if (!ASSERT_TRUE(!err || err == -ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_batch specified cpu"))
+			goto out;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++)
+			if (!ASSERT_EQ(values[i], value,
+				       "bpf_map_lookup_batch value on specified cpu"))
+				goto out;
+
+		/* lookup values from all CPUs */
+		batch_opts.elem_flags = 0;
+		memset(values_percpu, 0, roundup(value_sz, 8) * nr_cpus * max_entries);
+		err = bpf_map_lookup_batch(map_fd, NULL, &batch, keys, values_percpu, &count,
+					   &batch_opts);
+		if (!ASSERT_TRUE(!err || err == -ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_batch all_cpus"))
+			goto out;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++) {
+			values_row = (void *) values_percpu +
+				     roundup(value_sz, 8) * i * nr_cpus;
+			for (j = 0; j < nr_cpus; j++) {
+				v = *(u32 *) (values_row + roundup(value_sz, 8) * j);
+				if (!ASSERT_EQ(v, j != cpu ? 0 : value,
+					       "bpf_map_lookup_batch value all_cpus"))
+					goto out;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+out:
+	free(values_percpu);
+	free(values);
+}
+
+static void test_percpu_map_cpu_flag(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
+{
+	struct percpu_alloc_array *skel;
+	size_t key_sz = sizeof(int);
+	int *keys = NULL, i, err;
+	struct bpf_map *map;
+	u32 max_entries;
+
+	skel = percpu_alloc_array__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "percpu_alloc_array__open"))
+		return;
+
+	map = skel->maps.percpu;
+	bpf_map__set_type(map, map_type);
+
+	err = percpu_alloc_array__load(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_percpu_alloc__load"))
+		goto out;
+
+	max_entries = bpf_map__max_entries(map);
+	keys = calloc(max_entries, key_sz);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(keys, "calloc keys"))
+		goto out;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < max_entries; i++)
+		keys[i] = i;
+
+	test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag(map, keys, key_sz, max_entries, true);
+out:
+	if (keys)
+		free(keys);
+	percpu_alloc_array__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_percpu_array_cpu_flag(void)
+{
+	test_percpu_map_cpu_flag(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
+}
+
+static void test_percpu_hash_cpu_flag(void)
+{
+	test_percpu_map_cpu_flag(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH);
+}
+
+static void test_lru_percpu_hash_cpu_flag(void)
+{
+	test_percpu_map_cpu_flag(BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH);
+}
+
+static void test_percpu_cgroup_storage_cpu_flag(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key key;
+	struct percpu_alloc_array *skel;
+	int cgroup = -1, prog_fd, err;
+	struct bpf_map *map;
+
+	skel = percpu_alloc_array__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "percpu_alloc_array__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	cgroup = create_and_get_cgroup("/cg_percpu");
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup, 0, "create_and_get_cgroup"))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = join_cgroup("/cg_percpu");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "join_cgroup"))
+		goto out;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.cgroup_egress);
+	err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
+		goto out;
+
+	map = skel->maps.percpu_cgroup_storage;
+	err = bpf_map_get_next_key(bpf_map__fd(map), NULL, &key);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_get_next_key"))
+		goto out;
+
+	test_percpu_map_op_cpu_flag(map, &key, sizeof(key), 1, false);
+out:
+	bpf_prog_detach2(-1, cgroup, BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS);
+	close(cgroup);
+	cleanup_cgroup_environment();
+	percpu_alloc_array__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 void test_percpu_alloc(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("array"))
@@ -125,4 +365,12 @@ void test_percpu_alloc(void)
 		test_cgrp_local_storage();
 	if (test__start_subtest("failure_tests"))
 		test_failure();
+	if (test__start_subtest("cpu_flag_percpu_array"))
+		test_percpu_array_cpu_flag();
+	if (test__start_subtest("cpu_flag_percpu_hash"))
+		test_percpu_hash_cpu_flag();
+	if (test__start_subtest("cpu_flag_lru_percpu_hash"))
+		test_lru_percpu_hash_cpu_flag();
+	if (test__start_subtest("cpu_flag_percpu_cgroup_storage"))
+		test_percpu_cgroup_storage_cpu_flag();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c
index 37c2d2608ec0b..ed6a2a93d5a51 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/percpu_alloc_array.c
@@ -187,4 +187,36 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_array_map_10)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 2);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, u32);
+} percpu SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("?fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test_percpu_array, int x)
+{
+	u64 value = 0xDEADC0DE;
+	int key = 0;
+
+	bpf_map_update_elem(&percpu, &key, &value, BPF_ANY);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE);
+	__type(key, struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key);
+	__type(value, u32);
+} percpu_cgroup_storage SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("cgroup_skb/egress")
+int cgroup_egress(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	u32 *val = bpf_get_local_storage(&percpu_cgroup_storage, 0);
+
+	*val = 1;
+	return 1;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.51.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-10-06 22:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2025-10-08  4:48     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-06 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
	dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot

On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
> maps to allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
> update_elem and update_batch APIs.
>
> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
> maps to allow:
>
> * update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
> APIs.
> * lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
> APIs.
>
> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:
>
> * map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
> * elem_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h  |  4 ++-
>  kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 31498b445b447..b3d9a584f34e2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2717,7 +2717,7 @@ int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>                                    struct bpf_func_state *caller,
>                                    struct bpf_func_state *callee);
>
> -int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
> +int bpf_percpu_hash_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
>  int bpf_percpu_array_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
>  int bpf_percpu_hash_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
>                            u64 flags);
> @@ -3772,6 +3772,8 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
>  {
>         switch (map_type) {
>         case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
> +       case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH:
> +       case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
>                 return true;
>         default:
>                 return false;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index c2fcd0cd51e51..6fb28ba2406c4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -945,24 +945,32 @@ static void free_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
>  }
>
>  static void pcpu_copy_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
> -                           void *value, bool onallcpus)
> +                           void *value, bool onallcpus, u64 map_flags)
>  {
>         if (!onallcpus) {
>                 /* copy true value_size bytes */
>                 copy_map_value(&htab->map, this_cpu_ptr(pptr), value);
>         } else {
> -               u32 size = round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
> -               int off = 0, cpu;
> +               u32 size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ?
> +                       htab->map.value_size : round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
> +               void *ptr;
> +               int cpu;
> +
> +               if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
> +                       cpu = map_flags >> 32;
> +                       memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value, size);
> +                       return;
> +               }
>
>                 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -                       copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
> -                       off += size;
> +                       ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
> +                       memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr, size);

ok, so you fixed the value_size problem and at the same time
introduced blind memcpy() problem?.. Per-CPU maps are allowed to have
some special fields (see BPF_REFCOUNT and BPF_KPTR_* checks in
map_check_btf()), which have to be handled specially inside
copy_map_value[_long](), we cannot just memcpy() blindly

all the other places use copy_map_value[_long](), why did you decide
to switch to memcpy here?

pw-bot: cr

>                 }
>         }
>  }
>

[...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps
  2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
@ 2025-10-06 22:33   ` Andrii Nakryiko
  2025-10-08  5:31     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-06 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
	dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot

On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
> allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for update_elem
> API.
>
> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
> allow:
>
> * update value for specified CPU for update_elem API.
> * lookup value for specified CPU for lookup_elem API.
>
> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h |  4 ++--
>  include/linux/bpf.h        |  1 +
>  kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c       |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> index aedf573bdb426..013f4db9903fd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ void bpf_cgroup_storage_link(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage,
>  void bpf_cgroup_storage_unlink(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage);
>  int bpf_cgroup_storage_assign(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux, struct bpf_map *map);
>
> -int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value);
> +int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, u64 flags);
>  int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
>                                      void *value, u64 flags);
>
> @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static inline struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(
>  static inline void bpf_cgroup_storage_free(
>         struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage) {}
>  static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> -                                                void *value) {
> +                                                void *value, u64 flags) {
>         return 0;
>  }
>  static inline int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *map,
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index b3d9a584f34e2..6250804394b53 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -3774,6 +3774,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
>         case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY:
>         case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH:
>         case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
> +       case BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE:
>                 return true;
>         default:
>                 return false;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
> index c93a756e035c0..f5188e0afa478 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static long cgroup_storage_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
>  }
>
>  int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
> -                                  void *value)
> +                                  void *value, u64 map_flags)
>  {
>         struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
>         struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
> @@ -198,12 +198,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>          * access 'value_size' of them, so copying rounded areas
>          * will not leak any kernel data
>          */
> +       if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
> +               cpu = map_flags >> 32;
> +               memcpy(value, per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), _map->value_size);

this is so far ok, because we don't seem to allow special fields for
PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE, but it's best to switch this one to
copy_map_value()

> +               goto unlock;
> +       }
>         size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>                 bpf_long_memcpy(value + off,
>                                 per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), size);

and let's switch this to copy_map_value_long() to future-proof this:
copy_map_value[_long]() should work correctly with any type of map and
will take care of all existing and future special fields

(but maybe have it as a separate patch with just that change to make it obvious)

>                 off += size;
>         }
> +unlock:
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -213,10 +219,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>  {
>         struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
>         struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
> -       int cpu, off = 0;
> +       void *ptr;
>         u32 size;
> +       int cpu;
>
> -       if (map_flags != BPF_ANY && map_flags != BPF_EXIST)
> +       if ((u32)map_flags & ~(BPF_ANY | BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
> @@ -232,12 +239,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>          * returned or zeros which were zero-filled by percpu_alloc,
>          * so no kernel data leaks possible
>          */
> -       size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
> +       size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ? _map->value_size :
> +               round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
> +       if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
> +               cpu = map_flags >> 32;
> +               memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), value, size);
> +               goto unlock;
> +       }
>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> -               bpf_long_memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu),
> -                               value + off, size);
> -               off += size;
> +               ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
> +               memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), ptr, size);
>         }
> +unlock:
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>         return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index ce525a474656a..b654115c99e01 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
>         } else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY) {
>                 err = bpf_percpu_array_copy(map, key, value, flags);
>         } else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE) {
> -               err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value);
> +               err = bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(map, key, value, flags);
>         } else if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE) {
>                 err = bpf_stackmap_extract(map, key, value, false);
>         } else if (IS_FD_ARRAY(map) || IS_FD_PROG_ARRAY(map)) {
> --
> 2.51.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps
  2025-10-06 22:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2025-10-08  4:48     ` Leon Hwang
  2025-10-13 23:17       ` Andrii Nakryiko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-10-08  4:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
	dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot



On 7/10/25 06:29, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
>> maps to allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
>> update_elem and update_batch APIs.
>>
>> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
>> maps to allow:
>>
>> * update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
>> APIs.
>> * lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
>> APIs.
>>
>> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:
>>
>> * map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>> * elem_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---

[...]

>>
>>                 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> -                       copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
>> -                       off += size;
>> +                       ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
>> +                       memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr, size);
>
> ok, so you fixed the value_size problem and at the same time
> introduced blind memcpy() problem?.. Per-CPU maps are allowed to have
> some special fields (see BPF_REFCOUNT and BPF_KPTR_* checks in
> map_check_btf()), which have to be handled specially inside
> copy_map_value[_long](), we cannot just memcpy() blindly
>
> all the other places use copy_map_value[_long](), why did you decide
> to switch to memcpy here?
>

You’re right — using memcpy() here is incorrect. I should be using
copy_map_value() instead.

When comparing this path with bpf_percpu_array_update(), I noticed that
bpf_obj_free_fields() is missing here. That was why I initially switched
to memcpy().

To clarify:

1. If those special fields (like BPF_REFCOUNT or BPF_KPTR_*) are
   *not* supported here, memcpy() behaves the same as
   copy_map_value().

static inline void bpf_obj_memcpy(struct btf_record *rec,
                                  void *dst, void *src, u32 size,
                                  bool long_memcpy)
{
        u32 curr_off = 0;
        int i;

        if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rec)) {
                if (long_memcpy)
                        bpf_long_memcpy(dst, src, round_up(size, 8));
                else
                        memcpy(dst, src, size);
                return;
        }

        ...
}

static inline void copy_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src)
{
        bpf_obj_memcpy(map->record, dst, src, map->value_size, false);
}

2. However, if those special fields *are* supported here, then missing
   bpf_obj_free_fields() seems like a real issue.
   In that case, I’d like to send a separate patch set to add
   bpf_obj_free_fields() properly.
   Does that sound reasonable?

Thanks,
Leon

[...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps
  2025-10-06 22:33   ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2025-10-08  5:31     ` Leon Hwang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Leon Hwang @ 2025-10-08  5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrii Nakryiko
  Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
	dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot



On 7/10/25 06:33, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
>> allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for update_elem
>> API.
>>
>> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps to
>> allow:
>>
>> * update value for specified CPU for update_elem API.
>> * lookup value for specified CPU for lookup_elem API.
>>
>> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
>> ---

[...]

>>  int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>> -                                  void *value)
>> +                                  void *value, u64 map_flags)
>>  {
>>         struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
>>         struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
>> @@ -198,12 +198,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_copy(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>>          * access 'value_size' of them, so copying rounded areas
>>          * will not leak any kernel data
>>          */
>> +       if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
>> +               cpu = map_flags >> 32;
>> +               memcpy(value, per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), _map->value_size);
> 
> this is so far ok, because we don't seem to allow special fields for
> PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE, but it's best to switch this one to
> copy_map_value()
> 

Agreed to use copy_map_value() here.

>> +               goto unlock;
>> +       }
>>         size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
>>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>                 bpf_long_memcpy(value + off,
>>                                 per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), size);
> 
> and let's switch this to copy_map_value_long() to future-proof this:
> copy_map_value[_long]() should work correctly with any type of map and
> will take care of all existing and future special fields
> 
> (but maybe have it as a separate patch with just that change to make it obvious)
> 

Ack.

>>                 off += size;
>>         }
>> +unlock:
>>         rcu_read_unlock();
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -213,10 +219,11 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>>  {
>>         struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map = map_to_storage(_map);
>>         struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
>> -       int cpu, off = 0;
>> +       void *ptr;
>>         u32 size;
>> +       int cpu;
>>
>> -       if (map_flags != BPF_ANY && map_flags != BPF_EXIST)
>> +       if ((u32)map_flags & ~(BPF_ANY | BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>
>>         rcu_read_lock();
>> @@ -232,12 +239,18 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
>>          * returned or zeros which were zero-filled by percpu_alloc,
>>          * so no kernel data leaks possible
>>          */
>> -       size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
>> +       size = (map_flags & (BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS)) ? _map->value_size :
>> +               round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
>> +       if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
>> +               cpu = map_flags >> 32;
>> +               memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), value, size);
>> +               goto unlock;
>> +       }
>>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> -               bpf_long_memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu),
>> -                               value + off, size);
>> -               off += size;
>> +               ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
>> +               memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), ptr, size);
Switch memcpy() to copy_map_value[_long](), too.

Thanks,
Leon

[...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps
  2025-10-08  4:48     ` Leon Hwang
@ 2025-10-13 23:17       ` Andrii Nakryiko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-13 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Hwang
  Cc: bpf, ast, andrii, daniel, jolsa, yonghong.song, song, eddyz87,
	dxu, deso, kernel-patches-bot

On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:48 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/10/25 06:29, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 8:40 AM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> wrote:
> >>
> >> Introduce BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
> >> maps to allow updating values for all CPUs with a single value for both
> >> update_elem and update_batch APIs.
> >>
> >> Introduce BPF_F_CPU flag support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash
> >> maps to allow:
> >>
> >> * update value for specified CPU for both update_elem and update_batch
> >> APIs.
> >> * lookup value for specified CPU for both lookup_elem and lookup_batch
> >> APIs.
> >>
> >> The BPF_F_CPU flag is passed via:
> >>
> >> * map_flags along with embedded cpu info.
> >> * elem_flags along with embedded cpu info.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> >> ---
>
> [...]
>
> >>
> >>                 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> >> -                       copy_map_value_long(&htab->map, per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), value + off);
> >> -                       off += size;
> >> +                       ptr = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
> >> +                       memcpy(per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), ptr, size);
> >
> > ok, so you fixed the value_size problem and at the same time
> > introduced blind memcpy() problem?.. Per-CPU maps are allowed to have
> > some special fields (see BPF_REFCOUNT and BPF_KPTR_* checks in
> > map_check_btf()), which have to be handled specially inside
> > copy_map_value[_long](), we cannot just memcpy() blindly
> >
> > all the other places use copy_map_value[_long](), why did you decide
> > to switch to memcpy here?
> >
>
> You’re right — using memcpy() here is incorrect. I should be using
> copy_map_value() instead.
>
> When comparing this path with bpf_percpu_array_update(), I noticed that
> bpf_obj_free_fields() is missing here. That was why I initially switched
> to memcpy().
>
> To clarify:
>
> 1. If those special fields (like BPF_REFCOUNT or BPF_KPTR_*) are
>    *not* supported here, memcpy() behaves the same as
>    copy_map_value().
>
> static inline void bpf_obj_memcpy(struct btf_record *rec,
>                                   void *dst, void *src, u32 size,
>                                   bool long_memcpy)
> {
>         u32 curr_off = 0;
>         int i;
>
>         if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rec)) {
>                 if (long_memcpy)
>                         bpf_long_memcpy(dst, src, round_up(size, 8));
>                 else
>                         memcpy(dst, src, size);
>                 return;
>         }
>
>         ...
> }
>
> static inline void copy_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src)
> {
>         bpf_obj_memcpy(map->record, dst, src, map->value_size, false);
> }
>
> 2. However, if those special fields *are* supported here, then missing
>    bpf_obj_free_fields() seems like a real issue.
>    In that case, I’d like to send a separate patch set to add
>    bpf_obj_free_fields() properly.
>    Does that sound reasonable?

Add a test and we'll know for sure? But it looks like yes, you can use
*some* special fields for per-CPU maps.

>
> Thanks,
> Leon
>
> [...]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-13 23:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-30 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/7] bpf: Introduce internal bpf_map_check_op_flags helper function Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps Leon Hwang
2025-10-06 22:29   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-08  4:48     ` Leon Hwang
2025-10-13 23:17       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/7] bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps Leon Hwang
2025-10-06 22:33   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-08  5:31     ` Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/7] libbpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu maps Leon Hwang
2025-09-30 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add cases to test BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags Leon Hwang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.