From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Yeounsu Moon <yyyynoom@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dlink: handle dma_map_single() failure properly
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 10:44:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251003094424.GF2878334@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002152638.1165-1-yyyynoom@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 12:26:38AM +0900, Yeounsu Moon wrote:
> Add error handling by checking `dma_mapping_error()` and cleaning up
> the `skb` using the appropriate `dev_kfree_skb*()` variant.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Yeounsu Moon <yyyynoom@gmail.com>
> Tested-on: D-Link DGE-550T Rev-A3
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c
> index 1996d2e4e3e2..a821c9921745 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c
> @@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ static int alloc_list(struct net_device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
> /* Allocated fixed size of skbuff */
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> + dma_addr_t addr;
>
> skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(dev, np->rx_buf_sz);
> np->rx_skbuff[i] = skb;
> @@ -516,13 +517,19 @@ static int alloc_list(struct net_device *dev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + addr = dma_map_single(&np->pdev->dev, skb->data,
> + np->rx_buf_sz, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(&np->pdev->dev, addr)) {
> + dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> + np->rx_skbuff[i] = NULL;
> + free_list(dev);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> np->rx_ring[i].next_desc = cpu_to_le64(np->rx_ring_dma +
> ((i + 1) % RX_RING_SIZE) *
> sizeof(struct netdev_desc));
> /* Rubicon now supports 40 bits of addressing space. */
> - np->rx_ring[i].fraginfo =
> - cpu_to_le64(dma_map_single(&np->pdev->dev, skb->data,
> - np->rx_buf_sz, DMA_FROM_DEVICE));
> + np->rx_ring[i].fraginfo = cpu_to_le64(addr);
> np->rx_ring[i].fraginfo |= cpu_to_le64((u64)np->rx_buf_sz << 48);
> }
>
Thanks.
I agree that this fixes a problem.
And I agree that these problems were introduced by the cited commit,
at a time when pci_map_single() was used instead of dma_map_single().
But I wonder if it would be slightly nicer to make this change by
using the idiomatic pattern of an unwind ladder of goto labels.
In the case of alloc_list(), something like the following.
(Compile tested only!)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c
index 1996d2e4e3e2..ba81373bbca8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dlink/dl2k.c
@@ -508,25 +508,36 @@ static int alloc_list(struct net_device *dev)
for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
/* Allocated fixed size of skbuff */
struct sk_buff *skb;
+ dma_addr_t addr;
skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(dev, np->rx_buf_sz);
np->rx_skbuff[i] = skb;
- if (!skb) {
- free_list(dev);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ if (!skb)
+ goto err_free_list;
+
+ addr = dma_map_single(&np->pdev->dev, skb->data,
+ np->rx_buf_sz, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ if (dma_mapping_error(&np->pdev->dev, addr))
+ goto err_kfree_skb;
np->rx_ring[i].next_desc = cpu_to_le64(np->rx_ring_dma +
((i + 1) % RX_RING_SIZE) *
sizeof(struct netdev_desc));
/* Rubicon now supports 40 bits of addressing space. */
- np->rx_ring[i].fraginfo =
- cpu_to_le64(dma_map_single(&np->pdev->dev, skb->data,
- np->rx_buf_sz, DMA_FROM_DEVICE));
+ np->rx_ring[i].fraginfo = cpu_to_le64(addr);
np->rx_ring[i].fraginfo |= cpu_to_le64((u64)np->rx_buf_sz << 48);
}
return 0;
+
+err_kfree_skb:
+ dev_kfree_skb(np->rx_skbuff[i]);
+ np->rx_skbuff[i] = NULL;
+err_free_list:
+ free_list(dev);
+
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
}
static void rio_hw_init(struct net_device *dev)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-03 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 15:26 [PATCH net] net: dlink: handle dma_map_single() failure properly Yeounsu Moon
2025-10-03 9:44 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-10-03 12:29 ` Yeounsu Moon
2025-10-03 15:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-05 5:22 ` Yeounsu Moon
2025-10-08 9:13 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-09 15:56 ` Yeounsu Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251003094424.GF2878334@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yyyynoom@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.