All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, brauner@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	graf@amazon.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	masahiroy@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	rppt@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, jasonmiu@google.com,
	dmatlack@google.com, skhawaja@google.com, glider@google.com,
	elver@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] liveupdate: kho: allocate metadata directly from the buddy allocator
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:20:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251024142014.GC760669@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CK2bA_Qb9csWvEQb-zpxgMg7vy+gw9eh0z88QBEdiFdtopMQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 09:57:24AM -0400, Pasha Tatashin wrote:

> You're right the new kernel will eventually zero memory, but KHO
> preserves at page granularity. If we preserve a single slab object,
> the entire page is handed off. When the new kernel maps that page
> (e.g., to userspace) to access the preserved object, it also exposes
> the unpreserved portions of that same page. Those portions contain
> stale data from the old kernel and won't have been zeroed yet,
> creating an easy-to-miss data leak vector. 

Do we zero any of the memory on KHO? Honestly, I wouldn't worry about
the point it zeros, slab guarentees it will be zero when it should be
zero.

> There's also the inefficiency. The unpreserved parts of that page are
> unusable by the new kernel until the preserved object is freed.

Thats not how I see slab preservation working. When the slab page
is unpreserved all the free space in that page should be immediately
available to the sucessor kernel.

> As I see it, the only robust solution is to use a special GFP flag.
> This would force these allocations to come from a dedicated pool of
> pages that are fully preserved, with no partial/mixed-use pages and
> also retrieved as slabs.

It is certainly more efficient to preserve fewer slab pages in total
and pooling would help get there.

> That said, I'm not sure preserving individual slab objects is a high
> priority right now. It might be simpler to avoid it altogether.

I think we will need something, a lot of the structs I'm seeing in
other patches are small and allocating a whole page is pretty wasteful
too.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-24 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-15  5:31 [PATCH 0/2] KHO: Fix metadata allocation in scratch area Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15  5:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] liveupdate: kho: warn and fail on metadata or preserved memory " Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15  8:21   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-15 12:36     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-16 17:23       ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-18 15:31         ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-18 15:28       ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 12:10   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-15 12:40     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 13:11       ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-15  5:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] liveupdate: kho: allocate metadata directly from the buddy allocator Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15  8:37   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-15 12:46     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 13:05   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-15 14:19     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 14:36       ` Alexander Potapenko
2025-10-24 13:25       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-24 13:57         ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 14:20           ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-10-24 14:36             ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 14:55               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-24 15:06                 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-15 14:22     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 13:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251024142014.GC760669@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=jasonmiu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.