From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@wdc.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] xfs: fake fallocate success for always CoW inodes
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 10:38:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110093828.GC22674@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lhuseem1mpe.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:27:41AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Sorry, I made the example confusing.
>
> How would the application deal with failure due to lack of fallocate
> support? It would have to do a pwrite, like posix_fallocate does to
> today, or maybe ftruncate. This is way I think removing the fallback
> from posix_fallocate completely is mostly pointless.
In general it would ftruncate. If it thinks it can't work without
preallocation at all the application will fail, as again the lack
of posix_fallocate means that space can't be preallocated.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 13:35 [RFC] xfs: fake fallocate success for always CoW inodes Hans Holmberg
2025-11-06 13:48 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-06 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 14:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-06 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 8:31 ` Hans Holmberg
2025-11-11 9:05 ` hch
2025-11-11 9:50 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-11 13:40 ` hch
2025-11-06 16:31 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-06 17:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-08 12:30 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-09 22:15 ` Dave Chinner
2025-11-10 5:27 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-10 9:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-10 10:03 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-10 20:28 ` Dave Chinner
2025-11-11 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-10 9:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-10 9:44 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-10 21:33 ` Dave Chinner
2025-11-11 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-11 9:30 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-10 9:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-10 9:48 ` truncatat? was, " Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-10 10:00 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-10 9:49 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-10 9:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251110093828.GC22674@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hans.holmberg@wdc.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.