From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org,
memxor@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/4] Replace BPF memory allocator with kmalloc_nolock() in local storage
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 12:13:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251114201329.3275875-1-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
This patchset tries to simplify bpf_local_storage.c by adopting
kmalloc_nolock(). This removes memory preallocation and reduces the
dependency of smap in bpf_selem_free() and bpf_local_storage_free().
The later will simplify a future refactor that replaces
local_storage->lock and b->lock [1].
RFC v1 tried to switch to kmalloc_nolock() unconditionally. However,
as there is substantial performance loss in socket local storage due to
1) defer_free() in kfree_nolock() and 2) no kfree_rcu() batching,
replacing kzalloc() is postponed until necessary improvements in mm
land.
Benchmark
./bench -p 1 local-storage-create --storage-type <socket,task> \
--batch-size <16,32,64>
The benchmark is a microbenchmark stress-testing how fast local storage
can be created. For task local storage, switching from BPF memory
allocator to kmalloc_nolock() yields a small amount of improvement. For
socket local storage, it remains roughly the same as nothing has changed.
Socket local storage
memory alloc batch creation speed creation speed diff
--------------- ---- ------------------ ----
kzalloc 16 144.149 ± 0.642k/s 3.10 kmallocs/create
(before) 32 144.379 ± 1.070k/s 3.08 kmallocs/create
64 144.491 ± 0.818k/s 3.13 kmallocs/create
kzalloc 16 146.180 ± 1.403k/s 3.10 kmallocs/create +1.4%
(not changed) 32 146.245 ± 1.272k/s 3.10 kmallocs/create +1.3%
64 145.012 ± 1.545k/s 3.10 kmallocs/create +0.4%
Task local storage
memory alloc batch creation speed creation speed diff
--------------- ---- ------------------ ----
BPF memory 16 24.668 ± 0.121k/s 2.54 kmallocs/create
allocator 32 22.899 ± 0.097k/s 2.67 kmallocs/create
(before) 64 22.559 ± 0.076k/s 2.56 kmallocs/create
kmalloc_nolock 16 25.796 ± 0.059k/s 2.52 kmallocs/create +4.6%
(after) 32 23.412 ± 0.069k/s 2.50 kmallocs/create +2.2%
64 23.717 ± 0.108k/s 2.60 kmallocs/create +5.1%
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251002225356.1505480-1-ameryhung@gmail.com/
v1 -> v2
- Only replace BPF memory allocator with kmalloc_nolock()
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251112175939.2365295-1-ameryhung@gmail.com/
---
Amery Hung (4):
bpf: Always charge/uncharge memory when allocating/unlinking storage
elements
bpf: Remove smap argument from bpf_selem_free()
bpf: Save memory alloction info in bpf_local_storage
bpf: Replace bpf memory allocator with kmalloc_nolock() in local
storage
include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 10 +-
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 235 +++++++++---------------------
net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 4 +-
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 20:13 Amery Hung [this message]
2025-11-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: Always charge/uncharge memory when allocating/unlinking storage elements Amery Hung
2025-11-17 18:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Remove smap argument from bpf_selem_free() Amery Hung
2025-11-17 18:32 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/4] bpf: Save memory alloction info in bpf_local_storage Amery Hung
2025-11-17 18:36 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/4] bpf: Replace bpf memory allocator with kmalloc_nolock() in local storage Amery Hung
2025-11-15 2:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-17 19:21 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-17 20:37 ` Amery Hung
2025-11-17 23:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-17 23:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-11-18 0:24 ` Amery Hung
2025-11-18 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-04-10 1:43 ` Slava Imameev
2025-11-19 0:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/4] Replace BPF " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251114201329.3275875-1-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.