From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@kernel.org,
memxor@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Remove smap argument from bpf_selem_free()
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 12:13:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251114201329.3275875-3-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114201329.3275875-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Since selem already saves a pointer to smap, use it instead of an
additional argument in bpf_selem_free(). This requires moving the
SDATA(selem)->smap assignment from bpf_selem_link_map() to
bpf_selem_alloc() since bpf_selem_free() may be called without the
selem being linked to smap in bpf_local_storage_update().
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 1 -
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index 3663eabcc3ff..4ab137e75f33 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ bpf_selem_alloc(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, void *owner, void *value,
bool swap_uptrs, gfp_t gfp_flags);
void bpf_selem_free(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
- struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
bool reuse_now);
int
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 400bdf8a3eb2..95a5ea618cc5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ bpf_selem_alloc(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap, void *owner,
}
if (selem) {
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(SDATA(selem)->smap, smap);
+
if (value) {
/* No need to call check_and_init_map_value as memory is zero init */
copy_map_value(&smap->map, SDATA(selem)->data, value);
@@ -227,9 +229,12 @@ static void bpf_selem_free_trace_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
}
void bpf_selem_free(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
- struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
bool reuse_now)
{
+ struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
+
+ smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, bpf_rcu_lock_held());
+
if (!smap->bpf_ma) {
/* Only task storage has uptrs and task storage
* has moved to bpf_mem_alloc. Meaning smap->bpf_ma == true
@@ -263,7 +268,6 @@ void bpf_selem_free(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
static void bpf_selem_free_list(struct hlist_head *list, bool reuse_now)
{
struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem;
- struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
struct hlist_node *n;
/* The "_safe" iteration is needed.
@@ -271,10 +275,8 @@ static void bpf_selem_free_list(struct hlist_head *list, bool reuse_now)
* but bpf_selem_free will use the selem->rcu_head
* which is union-ized with the selem->free_node.
*/
- hlist_for_each_entry_safe(selem, n, list, free_node) {
- smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, bpf_rcu_lock_held());
- bpf_selem_free(selem, smap, reuse_now);
- }
+ hlist_for_each_entry_safe(selem, n, list, free_node)
+ bpf_selem_free(selem, reuse_now);
}
/* local_storage->lock must be held and selem->local_storage == local_storage.
@@ -432,7 +434,6 @@ void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
- RCU_INIT_POINTER(SDATA(selem)->smap, smap);
hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->map_node, &b->list);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
}
@@ -586,7 +587,7 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
err = bpf_local_storage_alloc(owner, smap, selem, gfp_flags);
if (err) {
- bpf_selem_free(selem, smap, true);
+ bpf_selem_free(selem, true);
mem_uncharge(smap, owner, smap->elem_size);
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
@@ -662,7 +663,7 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
bpf_selem_free_list(&old_selem_free_list, false);
if (alloc_selem) {
mem_uncharge(smap, owner, smap->elem_size);
- bpf_selem_free(alloc_selem, smap, true);
+ bpf_selem_free(alloc_selem, true);
}
return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : SDATA(selem);
}
diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
index bd3c686edc0b..850dd736ccd1 100644
--- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
+++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ int bpf_sk_storage_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk)
} else {
ret = bpf_local_storage_alloc(newsk, smap, copy_selem, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (ret) {
- bpf_selem_free(copy_selem, smap, true);
+ bpf_selem_free(copy_selem, true);
atomic_sub(smap->elem_size,
&newsk->sk_omem_alloc);
bpf_map_put(map);
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 20:13 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/4] Replace BPF memory allocator with kmalloc_nolock() in local storage Amery Hung
2025-11-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: Always charge/uncharge memory when allocating/unlinking storage elements Amery Hung
2025-11-17 18:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-14 20:13 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2025-11-17 18:32 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Remove smap argument from bpf_selem_free() Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/4] bpf: Save memory alloction info in bpf_local_storage Amery Hung
2025-11-17 18:36 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-14 20:13 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 4/4] bpf: Replace bpf memory allocator with kmalloc_nolock() in local storage Amery Hung
2025-11-15 2:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-17 19:21 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-11-17 20:37 ` Amery Hung
2025-11-17 23:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-11-17 23:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-11-18 0:24 ` Amery Hung
2025-11-18 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-04-10 1:43 ` Slava Imameev
2025-11-19 0:30 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/4] Replace BPF " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251114201329.3275875-3-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.