From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Christian Benvenuti <benve@cisco.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/amd: Don't call report_iommu_fault()
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:26:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251120192612.GA258497@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023142657.GH262900@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:26:57AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > if (dev_data) {
> > > - /*
> > > - * If this is a DMA fault (for which the I(nterrupt)
> > > - * bit will be unset), allow report_iommu_fault() to
> > > - * prevent logging it.
> > > - */
> > > - if (IS_IOMMU_MEM_TRANSACTION(flags)) {
> > > - /* Device not attached to domain properly */
> > > - if (dev_data->domain == NULL) {
> > > - pr_err_ratelimited("Event logged [Device not attached to domain properly]\n");
> > > - pr_err_ratelimited(" device=%04x:%02x:%02x.%x domain=0x%04x\n",
> > > - iommu->pci_seg->id, PCI_BUS_NUM(devid), PCI_SLOT(devid),
> > > - PCI_FUNC(devid), domain_id);
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > This part is unrelated to the report_iommu_fault() call - in fact it was
> > specifically added even more recently.
>
> Yeah, I'll fix it
Coming back to this, it was right in the v1, it should be deleted.
The (dev_data->domain == NULL) test was added because calling
report_iommu_fault() will crash if the domain is NULL. This removed
that call it so we can't crash anymore.
Instead we fall through to this:
if (__ratelimit(&dev_data->rs)) {
pci_err(pdev, "Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x%04x address=0x%llx flags=0x%04x]\n",
domain_id, address, flags);
}
Which prints the same information, the "domain is null" is not
especially useful. Further this only happens when dev_data is set it
so is very unlikely to be NULL anyhow, there is only a short period
after probe before the default domain is attached.
I will add some remarks to the commit message since I forgot why I did
it when you asked :\
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Christian Benvenuti <benve@cisco.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>,
Rob Clark <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/amd: Don't call report_iommu_fault()
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:26:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251120192612.GA258497@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023142657.GH262900@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:26:57AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > if (dev_data) {
> > > - /*
> > > - * If this is a DMA fault (for which the I(nterrupt)
> > > - * bit will be unset), allow report_iommu_fault() to
> > > - * prevent logging it.
> > > - */
> > > - if (IS_IOMMU_MEM_TRANSACTION(flags)) {
> > > - /* Device not attached to domain properly */
> > > - if (dev_data->domain == NULL) {
> > > - pr_err_ratelimited("Event logged [Device not attached to domain properly]\n");
> > > - pr_err_ratelimited(" device=%04x:%02x:%02x.%x domain=0x%04x\n",
> > > - iommu->pci_seg->id, PCI_BUS_NUM(devid), PCI_SLOT(devid),
> > > - PCI_FUNC(devid), domain_id);
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > This part is unrelated to the report_iommu_fault() call - in fact it was
> > specifically added even more recently.
>
> Yeah, I'll fix it
Coming back to this, it was right in the v1, it should be deleted.
The (dev_data->domain == NULL) test was added because calling
report_iommu_fault() will crash if the domain is NULL. This removed
that call it so we can't crash anymore.
Instead we fall through to this:
if (__ratelimit(&dev_data->rs)) {
pci_err(pdev, "Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT domain=0x%04x address=0x%llx flags=0x%04x]\n",
domain_id, address, flags);
}
Which prints the same information, the "domain is null" is not
especially useful. Further this only happens when dev_data is set it
so is very unlikely to be NULL anyhow, there is only a short period
after probe before the default domain is attached.
I will add some remarks to the commit message since I forgot why I did
it when you asked :\
Jason
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 17:12 [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup around iommu_set_fault_handler() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-22 17:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-22 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] RDMA/usnic: Remove iommu_set_fault_handler() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-22 17:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 5:02 ` Baolu Lu
2025-10-23 5:02 ` Baolu Lu
2025-10-22 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu/amd: Don't call report_iommu_fault() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-22 17:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2025-10-23 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2025-10-23 14:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 14:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-20 19:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-11-20 19:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-22 17:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu: Allow drivers to say if they use report_iommu_fault() Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-22 17:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 5:06 ` Baolu Lu
2025-10-23 5:06 ` Baolu Lu
2025-10-23 11:24 ` Robin Murphy
2025-10-23 11:24 ` Robin Murphy
2025-10-23 14:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 14:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 16:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 16:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251120192612.GA258497@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=benve@cisco.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=neescoba@cisco.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.