All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [merged mm-stable] zram-drop-wb_limit_lock.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2025-11-24 23:10 Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-11-24 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mm-commits, ywen.chen, richardycc, minchan, bgeffon, senozhatsky,
	akpm


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: zram: drop wb_limit_lock
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     zram-drop-wb_limit_lock.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: zram: drop wb_limit_lock
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 16:40:27 +0900

We don't need wb_limit_lock.  Writeback limit setters take an exclusive
write zram init_lock, while wb_limit modifications happen only from a
single task and under zram read init_lock.  No concurrent wb_limit
modifications are possible (we permit only one post-processing task at a
time).  Add lockdep assertions to wb_limit mutators.

While at it, fixup coding styles.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251122074029.3948921-5-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@google.com>
Cc: Richard Chang <richardycc@google.com>
Cc: Yuwen Chen <ywen.chen@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c |   22 +++++-----------------
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h |    1 -
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-drop-wb_limit_lock
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -532,9 +532,7 @@ static ssize_t writeback_limit_enable_st
 		return ret;
 
 	down_write(&zram->init_lock);
-	spin_lock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 	zram->wb_limit_enable = val;
-	spin_unlock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 	up_write(&zram->init_lock);
 	ret = len;
 
@@ -549,9 +547,7 @@ static ssize_t writeback_limit_enable_sh
 	struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
 
 	down_read(&zram->init_lock);
-	spin_lock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 	val = zram->wb_limit_enable;
-	spin_unlock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 	up_read(&zram->init_lock);
 
 	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", val);
@@ -569,9 +565,7 @@ static ssize_t writeback_limit_store(str
 		return ret;
 
 	down_write(&zram->init_lock);
-	spin_lock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 	zram->bd_wb_limit = val;
-	spin_unlock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 	up_write(&zram->init_lock);
 	ret = len;
 
@@ -579,15 +573,13 @@ static ssize_t writeback_limit_store(str
 }
 
 static ssize_t writeback_limit_show(struct device *dev,
-		struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	u64 val;
 	struct zram *zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
 
 	down_read(&zram->init_lock);
-	spin_lock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 	val = zram->bd_wb_limit;
-	spin_unlock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 	up_read(&zram->init_lock);
 
 	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", val);
@@ -869,18 +861,18 @@ release_wb_ctl:
 
 static void zram_account_writeback_rollback(struct zram *zram)
 {
-	spin_lock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held_read(&zram->init_lock);
+
 	if (zram->wb_limit_enable)
 		zram->bd_wb_limit +=  1UL << (PAGE_SHIFT - 12);
-	spin_unlock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 }
 
 static void zram_account_writeback_submit(struct zram *zram)
 {
-	spin_lock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
+	lockdep_assert_held_read(&zram->init_lock);
+
 	if (zram->wb_limit_enable && zram->bd_wb_limit > 0)
 		zram->bd_wb_limit -=  1UL << (PAGE_SHIFT - 12);
-	spin_unlock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 }
 
 static int zram_writeback_complete(struct zram *zram, struct zram_wb_req *req)
@@ -1005,13 +997,10 @@ static int zram_writeback_slots(struct z
 	u32 index = 0;
 
 	while ((pps = select_pp_slot(ctl))) {
-		spin_lock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 		if (zram->wb_limit_enable && !zram->bd_wb_limit) {
-			spin_unlock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 			ret = -EIO;
 			break;
 		}
-		spin_unlock(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 
 		while (!req) {
 			req = zram_select_idle_req(wb_ctl);
@@ -2962,7 +2951,6 @@ static int zram_add(void)
 	init_rwsem(&zram->init_lock);
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK
 	zram->wb_batch_size = 32;
-	spin_lock_init(&zram->wb_limit_lock);
 #endif
 
 	/* gendisk structure */
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h~zram-drop-wb_limit_lock
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ struct zram {
 	bool claim; /* Protected by disk->open_mutex */
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_WRITEBACK
 	struct file *backing_dev;
-	spinlock_t wb_limit_lock;
 	bool wb_limit_enable;
 	u32 wb_batch_size;
 	u64 bd_wb_limit;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from senozhatsky@chromium.org are



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-11-24 23:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-24 23:10 [merged mm-stable] zram-drop-wb_limit_lock.patch removed from -mm tree Andrew Morton

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.