Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] arm: Fix "file truncated" linker errors from empty built-in.a in SPL/TPL/VPL builds

[Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3139 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 12:52:06AM +0800, Sune Brian wrote:
> Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> 於 2025年12月2日週二 上午12:44寫道：
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 08:46:14AM +0800, Sune Brian wrote:
> > > Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> 於 2025年11月29日週六 上午12:50寫道：
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 06:44:12PM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 at 17:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 10:11:53AM +0800, Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 27/11/2025 11:09 pm, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > > > [CAUTION: This email is from outside your organization. Unless you trust
> > > > > > > > the sender, do not click on links or open attachments as it may be a
> > > > > > > > fraudulent email attempting to steal your information and/or compromise
> > > > > > > > your computer.]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 11/27/25 3:12 AM, Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I already have the referenced commit in my test branch, and I can
> > > > > > > > > confirm that the same compilation error still appears on CycloneV when
> > > > > > > > > certain directories produce no SPL objects.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The existing fix ensures that built-in.o is always present, but it does
> > > > > > > > > not prevent ar from generating empty built-in.a archives, which older
> > > > > > > > > ARM 32-bit linkers (such as CycloneV toolchains) reject as “file
> > > > > > > > > truncated”.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Which toolchain is this ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am using Linaro arm-linux-gnueabihf GCC 7.5.0 to compile our SoC32 devices
> > > > > > > - CycloneV and Arria10
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ilias, do you recall the solution to this problem from when it came up
> > > > > > on IRC a few weeks ago?
> > > > >
> > > > > Nop unfortunately not.
> > > > > Was this caused by the Kbuild bump? I remember the logic around
> > > > > builtin changing significantly.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, and I kinda thought we narrowed it down to something being missing
> > > > from the update, since the kernel does support this old of a toolchain
> > > > (or at least the 10.x? someone else this on).
> > >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > Actually I am not sure u-boot itself have minimum requirement on each tag
> > > or branch listed?
> >
> > We do not currently have a test for anything other than "newer than
> > gcc-6" for ARM, but should have the same minimum requirements as the
> > linux kernel, but are lacking enforcement checks (but I also think the
> > kernel is?).
> >
> > --
> > Tom
> 
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Oops, missing the kernel version. Add it back for better debug.

Sorry, what I meant was that it's a kbuild related issue as to what
version of gcc can be used. We don't have a check, and should, but also
the versions in question here should be expected to work. There's just
some change we're missing.

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]