[PATCH v1 1/1] args: Fix documentation to reflect the correct numbers

[PATCH v1 1/1] args: Fix documentation to reflect the correct numbers

[Andy Shevchenko]

The macro uses up to 15 arguments. Reflect this in the top
level comment.

Fixes: d51e783c17ba ("lsm: count the LSMs enabled at compile time")
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 include/linux/args.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/args.h b/include/linux/args.h
index 2e8e65d975c7..0562dc51435e 100644
--- a/include/linux/args.h
+++ b/include/linux/args.h
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
 /*
  * How do these macros work?
  *
- * In __COUNT_ARGS() _0 to _12 are just placeholders from the start
+ * In __COUNT_ARGS() _0 to _15 are just placeholders from the start
  * in order to make sure _n is positioned over the correct number
- * from 12 to 0 (depending on X, which is a variadic argument list).
+ * from 15 to 0 (depending on X, which is a variadic argument list).
  * They serve no purpose other than occupying a position. Since each
  * macro parameter must have a distinct identifier, those identifiers
  * are as good as any.
-- 
2.50.1

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] args: Fix documentation to reflect the correct numbers

[Randy Dunlap]

On 12/1/25 12:10 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The macro uses up to 15 arguments. Reflect this in the top
> level comment.
> 

You made me look!

Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

Thanks.

> Fixes: d51e783c17ba ("lsm: count the LSMs enabled at compile time")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/args.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/args.h b/include/linux/args.h
> index 2e8e65d975c7..0562dc51435e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/args.h
> +++ b/include/linux/args.h
> @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
>  /*
>   * How do these macros work?
>   *
> - * In __COUNT_ARGS() _0 to _12 are just placeholders from the start
> + * In __COUNT_ARGS() _0 to _15 are just placeholders from the start
>   * in order to make sure _n is positioned over the correct number
> - * from 12 to 0 (depending on X, which is a variadic argument list).
> + * from 15 to 0 (depending on X, which is a variadic argument list).
>   * They serve no purpose other than occupying a position. Since each
>   * macro parameter must have a distinct identifier, those identifiers
>   * are as good as any.

-- 
~Randy