From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@gtucker.io>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scripts: add tool to run containerized builds
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 12:47:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251219194748.GA1404325@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97dec58ebe4161027f13f2215ed9da4a43bc8c47.1765374789.git.gtucker@gtucker.io>
Hi Guillaume,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 02:58:28PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> Add a 'scripts/container' tool written in Python to run any command in
> the source tree from within a container. This can typically be used
> to call 'make' with a compiler toolchain image to run reproducible
> builds but any arbitrary command can be run too. Only Docker and
> Podman are supported for this initial version.
>
> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/affb7aff-dc9b-4263-bbd4-a7965c19ac4e@gtucker.io/
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@gtucker.io>
Overall, I like the concept here. It is simple and should be relatively
easy for people to drive. I think having some short quick examples (or a
link to the Documentation file that inclues them) would be good in case
people stumble across the script first.
One initial comment (or perhaps feature request) would be handling O= /
KBUILD_OUTPUT for building out of tree. It may be a little complicated
for mounting the build directory into the container but it might make it
easier for folks who build out of tree to use.
> ---
> scripts/container | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 scripts/container
>
> diff --git a/scripts/container b/scripts/container
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..74644ac33685
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/container
> @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
> +#!/bin/env python3
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +# Copyright (C) 2025 Guillaume Tucker
> +
> +"""Containerized builds"""
> +
> +import argparse
> +import logging
> +import os
> +import subprocess
> +import sys
> +
> +
> +def get_logger(verbose):
> + """Set up a logger with the appropriate level"""
> + logger = logging.getLogger('container')
> + handler = logging.StreamHandler()
> + handler.setFormatter(logging.Formatter(
> + fmt='[container {levelname}] {message}', style='{'
> + ))
> + logger.addHandler(handler)
> + logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG if verbose is True else logging.INFO)
> + return logger
> +
> +
> +def run_docker(args):
> + """Run a command in a Docker container"""
> + uid = args.uid or os.getuid()
> + gid = args.gid or args.uid or os.getgid()
> + cmd = [
> + 'docker', 'run',
> + '--interactive',
> + '--volume', f'{os.getcwd()}:/src',
Is there a minimum python version required for this? If not, I would
prefer using pathlib here:
from pathlib import Path
then
Path.cwd()
> + '--workdir', '/src',
> + '--user', f'{uid}:{gid}'
> + ]
> + if args.env_file:
> + cmd += ['--env-file', args.env_file]
> + cmd.append(args.image)
> + cmd += args.cmd
> + return subprocess.call(cmd)
> +
> +
> +def run_podman(args):
> + """Run a command in a Podman container"""
> + uid = args.uid or 1000
> + gid = args.gid or args.uid or 1000
Why 1000 instead of using getuid() and getgid() as above?
> + cmd = [
> + 'podman', 'run',
> + '--interactive',
> + '--volume', f'{os.getcwd()}:/src',
> + '--workdir', '/src',
> + '--userns', f'keep-id:uid={uid},gid={gid}',
> + ]
> + if args.env_file:
> + cmd += ['--env-file', args.env_file]
> + cmd.append(args.image)
> + cmd += args.cmd
> + return subprocess.call(cmd)
Most of these two functions are the same. Maybe they could be abstracted
into a simple class so that most of the logic could be shared between
the two implementations? That also might simplify main() a bit and make
fulfilling David's request a little simpler as well.
> +def main(args):
> + """Main entry point for the container tool"""
> + logger = get_logger(args.verbose)
> + logger.debug("runtime=%s, image=%s", args.runtime, args.image)
> + runtimes = {
> + 'docker': run_docker,
> + 'podman': run_podman,
> + }
> + handler = runtimes.get(args.runtime)
> + if not handler:
> + logger.error("Unknown container runtime: %s", args.runtime)
> + return 1
> + try:
> + return handler(args)
> + except KeyboardInterrupt:
> + logger.error("aborted")
> + return 1
> +
> +
> +if __name__ == '__main__':
> + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser("Containerized builds")
> + parser.add_argument(
> + '-e', '--env-file',
> + help="Path to an environment file to load in the container."
> + )
Is there documentation for how an environment file should be formatter?
> + parser.add_argument(
> + '-g', '--gid',
> + help="Group ID to use inside the container."
> + )
> + parser.add_argument(
> + '-i', '--image', default='gcc',
> + help="Container image, default is gcc."
> + )
> + parser.add_argument(
> + '-r', '--runtime', choices=['docker', 'podman'], default='docker',
> + help="Container runtime, default is docker."
> + )
> + parser.add_argument(
> + '-u', '--uid',
> + help="User ID to use inside the container. If the -g option is not"
> + "specified, the user ID will also be used for the group ID."
> + )
> + parser.add_argument(
> + '-v', '--verbose', action='store_true',
> + help="Enable verbose output."
> + )
> + parser.add_argument(
> + 'cmd', nargs='+',
> + help="Command to run in the container"
> + )
> + sys.exit(main(parser.parse_args(sys.argv[1:])))
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-19 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 13:58 [PATCH v1 0/2] scripts: introduce containerized builds Guillaume Tucker
2025-12-10 13:58 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] scripts: add tool to run " Guillaume Tucker
2025-12-13 4:16 ` Guillaume Tucker
2025-12-15 9:24 ` Onur Özkan
2025-12-15 10:15 ` Guillaume Tucker
2025-12-17 9:56 ` [Automated-testing] " David Gow
2025-12-17 13:51 ` Guillaume Tucker
2025-12-19 19:47 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-12-19 21:15 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-12-21 20:04 ` Guillaume Tucker
2025-12-31 16:54 ` Guillaume Tucker
2025-12-10 13:58 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: add container.rst page Guillaume Tucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251219194748.GA1404325@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org \
--cc=gtucker@gtucker.io \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.