From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
jiang.biao@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/10] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession cookie
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 21:07:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251224130735.201422-10-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224130735.201422-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Test session cookie for fsession. Multiple fsession BPF progs is attached
to bpf_fentry_test1() and session cookie is read and write in the
testcase.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
---
v3:
- restructure the testcase by combine the testcases for session cookie and
get_func_ip into one patch
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c | 25 +++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
index 83f3953a1ff6..2459f9db1c92 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
@@ -77,6 +77,29 @@ static void test_fsession_reattach(void)
fsession_test__destroy(skel);
}
+static void test_fsession_cookie(void)
+{
+ struct fsession_test *skel = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = fsession_test__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fsession_test__open"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test11, true);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_autoload"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = fsession_test__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fsession_test__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = fsession_test__attach(skel);
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -E2BIG, "fsession_cookie");
+cleanup:
+ fsession_test__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void test_fsession_test(void)
{
#if !defined(__x86_64__)
@@ -87,4 +110,6 @@ void test_fsession_test(void)
test_fsession_basic();
if (test__start_subtest("fsession_reattach"))
test_fsession_reattach();
+ if (test__start_subtest("fsession_cookie"))
+ test_fsession_cookie();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c
index b180e339c17f..5630cf3bbd8b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c
@@ -108,3 +108,75 @@ int BPF_PROG(test6, int a)
test6_entry_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
return 0;
}
+
+__u64 test7_entry_ok = 0;
+__u64 test7_exit_ok = 0;
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test7, int a)
+{
+ __u64 *cookie = bpf_fsession_cookie(ctx);
+
+ if (!bpf_fsession_is_return(ctx)) {
+ *cookie = 0xAAAABBBBCCCCDDDDull;
+ test7_entry_ok = *cookie == 0xAAAABBBBCCCCDDDDull;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ test7_exit_ok = *cookie == 0xAAAABBBBCCCCDDDDull;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test8_entry_ok = 0;
+__u64 test8_exit_ok = 0;
+
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test8, int a)
+{
+ __u64 *cookie = bpf_fsession_cookie(ctx);
+
+ if (!bpf_fsession_is_return(ctx)) {
+ *cookie = 0x1111222233334444ull;
+ test8_entry_ok = *cookie == 0x1111222233334444ull;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ test8_exit_ok = *cookie == 0x1111222233334444ull;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test9_entry_result = 0;
+__u64 test9_exit_result = 0;
+
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test9, int a, int ret)
+{
+ __u64 *cookie = bpf_fsession_cookie(ctx);
+
+ if (!bpf_fsession_is_return(ctx)) {
+ test9_entry_result = a == 1 && ret == 0;
+ *cookie = 0x123456ULL;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ test9_exit_result = a == 1 && ret == 2 && *cookie == 0x123456ULL;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test10, int a, int ret)
+{
+ __u64 *cookie = bpf_fsession_cookie(ctx);
+
+ *cookie = 0;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* This is the 5th cookie, so it should fail */
+SEC("?fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test11, int a, int ret)
+{
+ __u64 *cookie = bpf_fsession_cookie(ctx);
+
+ *cookie = 0;
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-24 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-24 13:07 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/10] bpf: fsession support Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/10] bpf: add " Menglong Dong
2026-01-01 13:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-01-02 9:21 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-02 12:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/10] bpf: use last 8-bits for the nr_args in trampoline Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/10] bpf: add the kfunc bpf_fsession_is_return Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/10] bpf: add the kfunc bpf_fsession_cookie Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/10] bpf,x86: introduce emit_st_r0_imm64() for trampoline Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/10] bpf,x86: add fsession support for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/10] libbpf: add fsession support Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/10] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/10] selftests/bpf: test fsession mixed with fentry and fexit Menglong Dong
2026-01-02 23:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/10] bpf: fsession support Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-03 4:41 ` Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251224130735.201422-10-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
--to=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.biao@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.