From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
dsahern@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
jiang.biao@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/10] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 21:07:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251224130735.201422-9-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224130735.201422-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
Add testcases for BPF_TRACE_FSESSION. The function arguments and return
value are tested both in the entry and exit. And the kfunc
bpf_fsession_is_ret() is also tested.
As the layout of the stack changed for fsession, so we also test
bpf_get_func_ip() for it.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
---
v3:
- restructure the testcase by combine the testcases for session cookie and
get_func_ip into one patch
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c | 90 ++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 200 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..83f3953a1ff6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fsession_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 ChinaTelecom */
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "fsession_test.skel.h"
+
+static int check_result(struct fsession_test *skel)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ /* Trigger test function calls */
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test1);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err"))
+ return err;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run_opts retval"))
+ return topts.retval;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(*skel->bss) / sizeof(__u64); i++) {
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(((__u64 *)skel->bss)[i], 1, "test_result"))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void test_fsession_basic(void)
+{
+ struct fsession_test *skel = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = fsession_test__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fsession_test__open_and_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ err = fsession_test__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fsession_attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ check_result(skel);
+cleanup:
+ fsession_test__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_fsession_reattach(void)
+{
+ struct fsession_test *skel = NULL;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = fsession_test__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "fsession_test__open_and_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* First attach */
+ err = fsession_test__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fsession_first_attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (check_result(skel))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* Detach */
+ fsession_test__detach(skel);
+
+ /* Reset counters */
+ memset(skel->bss, 0, sizeof(*skel->bss));
+
+ /* Second attach */
+ err = fsession_test__attach(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fsession_second_attach"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ if (check_result(skel))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+cleanup:
+ fsession_test__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_fsession_test(void)
+{
+#if !defined(__x86_64__)
+ test__skip();
+ return;
+#endif
+ if (test__start_subtest("fsession_basic"))
+ test_fsession_basic();
+ if (test__start_subtest("fsession_reattach"))
+ test_fsession_reattach();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b180e339c17f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fsession_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2025 ChinaTelecom */
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+__u64 test1_entry_result = 0;
+__u64 test1_exit_result = 0;
+
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test1, int a, int ret)
+{
+ bool is_exit = bpf_fsession_is_return(ctx);
+
+ if (!is_exit) {
+ test1_entry_result = a == 1 && ret == 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ test1_exit_result = a == 1 && ret == 2;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test2_entry_result = 0;
+__u64 test2_exit_result = 0;
+
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test3")
+int BPF_PROG(test2, char a, int b, __u64 c, int ret)
+{
+ bool is_exit = bpf_fsession_is_return(ctx);
+
+ if (!is_exit) {
+ test2_entry_result = a == 4 && b == 5 && c == 6 && ret == 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ test2_exit_result = a == 4 && b == 5 && c == 6 && ret == 15;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test3_entry_result = 0;
+__u64 test3_exit_result = 0;
+
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test4")
+int BPF_PROG(test3, void *a, char b, int c, __u64 d, int ret)
+{
+ bool is_exit = bpf_fsession_is_return(ctx);
+
+ if (!is_exit) {
+ test3_entry_result = a == (void *)7 && b == 8 && c == 9 && d == 10 && ret == 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ test3_exit_result = a == (void *)7 && b == 8 && c == 9 && d == 10 && ret == 34;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test4_entry_result = 0;
+__u64 test4_exit_result = 0;
+
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test5")
+int BPF_PROG(test4, __u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, __u64 e, int ret)
+{
+ bool is_exit = bpf_fsession_is_return(ctx);
+
+ if (!is_exit) {
+ test4_entry_result = a == 11 && b == (void *)12 && c == 13 && d == 14 &&
+ e == 15 && ret == 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ test4_exit_result = a == 11 && b == (void *)12 && c == 13 && d == 14 &&
+ e == 15 && ret == 65;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test5_entry_result = 0;
+__u64 test5_exit_result = 0;
+
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test7")
+int BPF_PROG(test5, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg, int ret)
+{
+ bool is_exit = bpf_fsession_is_return(ctx);
+
+ if (!is_exit) {
+ if (!arg)
+ test5_entry_result = ret == 0;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!arg)
+ test5_exit_result = 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test6_entry_result = 0;
+__u64 test6_exit_result = 0;
+SEC("fsession/bpf_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test6, int a)
+{
+ __u64 addr = bpf_get_func_ip(ctx);
+
+ if (bpf_fsession_is_return(ctx))
+ test6_exit_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
+ else
+ test6_entry_result = (const void *) addr == &bpf_fentry_test1;
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-24 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-24 13:07 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/10] bpf: fsession support Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/10] bpf: add " Menglong Dong
2026-01-01 13:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-01-02 9:21 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-02 12:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/10] bpf: use last 8-bits for the nr_args in trampoline Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/10] bpf: add the kfunc bpf_fsession_is_return Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/10] bpf: add the kfunc bpf_fsession_cookie Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/10] bpf,x86: introduce emit_st_r0_imm64() for trampoline Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/10] bpf,x86: add fsession support for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/10] libbpf: add fsession support Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/10] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession cookie Menglong Dong
2025-12-24 13:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/10] selftests/bpf: test fsession mixed with fentry and fexit Menglong Dong
2026-01-02 23:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/10] bpf: fsession support Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-03 4:41 ` Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251224130735.201422-9-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
--to=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.biao@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.