* [to-be-updated] lib-group_cpus-make-group-cpu-cluster-aware.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2026-01-09 22:48 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2026-01-09 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, tim.c.chen, tianyou.li, tglx, dan.liang, wangyang.guo,
akpm
The quilt patch titled
Subject: lib/group_cpus: make group CPU cluster aware
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
lib-group_cpus-make-group-cpu-cluster-aware.patch
This patch was dropped because an updated version will be issued
------------------------------------------------------
From: Wangyang Guo <wangyang.guo@intel.com>
Subject: lib/group_cpus: make group CPU cluster aware
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:30:38 +0800
As CPU core counts increase, the number of NVMe IRQs may be smaller than
the total number of CPUs. This forces multiple CPUs to share the same
IRQ. If the IRQ affinity and the CPU's cluster do not align, a
performance penalty can be observed on some platforms.
This patch improves IRQ affinity by grouping CPUs by cluster within each
NUMA domain, ensuring better locality between CPUs and their assigned NVMe
IRQs.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251024023038.872616-1-wangyang.guo@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Wangyang Guo <wangyang.guo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tianyou Li <tianyou.li@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Dan Liang <dan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleinxer <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
lib/group_cpus.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 204 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/group_cpus.c~lib-group_cpus-make-group-cpu-cluster-aware
+++ a/lib/group_cpus.c
@@ -114,48 +114,15 @@ static int ncpus_cmp_func(const void *l,
return ln->ncpus - rn->ncpus;
}
-/*
- * Allocate group number for each node, so that for each node:
- *
- * 1) the allocated number is >= 1
- *
- * 2) the allocated number is <= active CPU number of this node
- *
- * The actual allocated total groups may be less than @numgrps when
- * active total CPU number is less than @numgrps.
- *
- * Active CPUs means the CPUs in '@cpu_mask AND @node_to_cpumask[]'
- * for each node.
- */
-static void alloc_nodes_groups(unsigned int numgrps,
- cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask,
- const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
- const nodemask_t nodemsk,
- struct cpumask *nmsk,
- struct node_groups *node_groups)
+static void alloc_groups_to_nodes(unsigned int numgrps,
+ unsigned int numcpus,
+ struct node_groups *node_groups,
+ unsigned int num_nodes)
{
- unsigned n, remaining_ncpus = 0;
-
- for (n = 0; n < nr_node_ids; n++) {
- node_groups[n].id = n;
- node_groups[n].ncpus = UINT_MAX;
- }
-
- for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
- unsigned ncpus;
+ unsigned int n, remaining_ncpus = numcpus;
+ unsigned int ngroups, ncpus;
- cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_mask, node_to_cpumask[n]);
- ncpus = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
-
- if (!ncpus)
- continue;
- remaining_ncpus += ncpus;
- node_groups[n].ncpus = ncpus;
- }
-
- numgrps = min_t(unsigned, remaining_ncpus, numgrps);
-
- sort(node_groups, nr_node_ids, sizeof(node_groups[0]),
+ sort(node_groups, num_nodes, sizeof(node_groups[0]),
ncpus_cmp_func, NULL);
/*
@@ -226,9 +193,8 @@ static void alloc_nodes_groups(unsigned
* finally for each node X: grps(X) <= ncpu(X).
*
*/
- for (n = 0; n < nr_node_ids; n++) {
- unsigned ngroups, ncpus;
+ for (n = 0; n < num_nodes; n++) {
if (node_groups[n].ncpus == UINT_MAX)
continue;
@@ -246,12 +212,199 @@ static void alloc_nodes_groups(unsigned
}
}
+/*
+ * Allocate group number for each node, so that for each node:
+ *
+ * 1) the allocated number is >= 1
+ *
+ * 2) the allocated number is <= active CPU number of this node
+ *
+ * The actual allocated total groups may be less than @numgrps when
+ * active total CPU number is less than @numgrps.
+ *
+ * Active CPUs means the CPUs in '@cpu_mask AND @node_to_cpumask[]'
+ * for each node.
+ */
+static void alloc_nodes_groups(unsigned int numgrps,
+ cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask,
+ const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
+ const nodemask_t nodemsk,
+ struct cpumask *nmsk,
+ struct node_groups *node_groups)
+{
+ unsigned int n, numcpus = 0;
+
+ for (n = 0; n < nr_node_ids; n++) {
+ node_groups[n].id = n;
+ node_groups[n].ncpus = UINT_MAX;
+ }
+
+ for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
+ unsigned int ncpus;
+
+ cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_mask, node_to_cpumask[n]);
+ ncpus = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
+
+ if (!ncpus)
+ continue;
+ numcpus += ncpus;
+ node_groups[n].ncpus = ncpus;
+ }
+
+ numgrps = min_t(unsigned int, numcpus, numgrps);
+ alloc_groups_to_nodes(numgrps, numcpus, node_groups, nr_node_ids);
+}
+
+static void assign_cpus_to_groups(unsigned int ncpus,
+ struct cpumask *nmsk,
+ struct node_groups *nv,
+ struct cpumask *masks,
+ unsigned int *curgrp,
+ unsigned int last_grp)
+{
+ unsigned int v, cpus_per_grp, extra_grps;
+ /* Account for rounding errors */
+ extra_grps = ncpus - nv->ngroups * (ncpus / nv->ngroups);
+
+ /* Spread allocated groups on CPUs of the current node */
+ for (v = 0; v < nv->ngroups; v++, *curgrp += 1) {
+ cpus_per_grp = ncpus / nv->ngroups;
+
+ /* Account for extra groups to compensate rounding errors */
+ if (extra_grps) {
+ cpus_per_grp++;
+ --extra_grps;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * wrapping has to be considered given 'startgrp'
+ * may start anywhere
+ */
+ if (*curgrp >= last_grp)
+ *curgrp = 0;
+ grp_spread_init_one(&masks[*curgrp], nmsk, cpus_per_grp);
+ }
+}
+
+static int alloc_cluster_groups(unsigned int ncpus,
+ unsigned int ngroups,
+ struct cpumask *node_cpumask,
+ cpumask_var_t msk,
+ const struct cpumask ***clusters_ptr,
+ struct node_groups **cluster_groups_ptr)
+{
+ unsigned int ncluster = 0;
+ unsigned int cpu, nc, n;
+ const struct cpumask *cluster_mask;
+ const struct cpumask **clusters;
+ struct node_groups *cluster_groups;
+
+ cpumask_copy(msk, node_cpumask);
+
+ /* Probe how many clusters in this node. */
+ while (1) {
+ cpu = cpumask_first(msk);
+ if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ break;
+
+ cluster_mask = topology_cluster_cpumask(cpu);
+ /* Clean out CPUs on the same cluster. */
+ cpumask_andnot(msk, msk, cluster_mask);
+ ncluster++;
+ }
+
+ /* If ngroups < ncluster, cross cluster is inevitable, skip. */
+ if (ncluster == 0 || ncluster > ngroups)
+ goto no_cluster;
+
+ /* Allocate memory based on cluster number. */
+ clusters = kcalloc(ncluster, sizeof(struct cpumask *), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!clusters)
+ goto no_cluster;
+ cluster_groups = kcalloc(ncluster, sizeof(struct node_groups), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cluster_groups)
+ goto fail_cluster_groups;
+
+ /* Filling cluster info for later process. */
+ cpumask_copy(msk, node_cpumask);
+ for (n = 0; n < ncluster; n++) {
+ cpu = cpumask_first(msk);
+ cluster_mask = topology_cluster_cpumask(cpu);
+ nc = cpumask_weight_and(cluster_mask, node_cpumask);
+ clusters[n] = cluster_mask;
+ cluster_groups[n].id = n;
+ cluster_groups[n].ncpus = nc;
+ cpumask_andnot(msk, msk, cluster_mask);
+ }
+
+ alloc_groups_to_nodes(ngroups, ncpus, cluster_groups, ncluster);
+
+ *clusters_ptr = clusters;
+ *cluster_groups_ptr = cluster_groups;
+ return ncluster;
+
+ fail_cluster_groups:
+ kfree(clusters);
+ no_cluster:
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Try group CPUs evenly for cluster locality within a NUMA node.
+ *
+ * Return: true if success, false otherwise.
+ */
+static bool __try_group_cluster_cpus(unsigned int ncpus,
+ unsigned int ngroups,
+ struct cpumask *node_cpumask,
+ struct cpumask *masks,
+ unsigned int *curgrp,
+ unsigned int last_grp)
+{
+ struct node_groups *cluster_groups;
+ const struct cpumask **clusters;
+ unsigned int ncluster;
+ bool ret = false;
+ cpumask_var_t nmsk;
+ unsigned int i, nc;
+
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&nmsk, GFP_KERNEL))
+ goto fail_nmsk_alloc;
+
+ ncluster = alloc_cluster_groups(ncpus, ngroups, node_cpumask, nmsk,
+ &clusters, &cluster_groups);
+
+ if (ncluster == 0)
+ goto fail_no_clusters;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ncluster; i++) {
+ struct node_groups *nv = &cluster_groups[i];
+
+ /* Get the cpus on this cluster. */
+ cpumask_and(nmsk, node_cpumask, clusters[nv->id]);
+ nc = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
+ if (!nc)
+ continue;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(nv->ngroups > nc);
+
+ assign_cpus_to_groups(nc, nmsk, nv, masks, curgrp, last_grp);
+ }
+
+ ret = true;
+ kfree(cluster_groups);
+ kfree(clusters);
+ fail_no_clusters:
+ free_cpumask_var(nmsk);
+ fail_nmsk_alloc:
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int __group_cpus_evenly(unsigned int startgrp, unsigned int numgrps,
cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask,
const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
struct cpumask *nmsk, struct cpumask *masks)
{
- unsigned int i, n, nodes, cpus_per_grp, extra_grps, done = 0;
+ unsigned int i, n, nodes, done = 0;
unsigned int last_grp = numgrps;
unsigned int curgrp = startgrp;
nodemask_t nodemsk = NODE_MASK_NONE;
@@ -287,7 +440,7 @@ static int __group_cpus_evenly(unsigned
alloc_nodes_groups(numgrps, node_to_cpumask, cpu_mask,
nodemsk, nmsk, node_groups);
for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) {
- unsigned int ncpus, v;
+ unsigned int ncpus;
struct node_groups *nv = &node_groups[i];
if (nv->ngroups == UINT_MAX)
@@ -301,28 +454,14 @@ static int __group_cpus_evenly(unsigned
WARN_ON_ONCE(nv->ngroups > ncpus);
- /* Account for rounding errors */
- extra_grps = ncpus - nv->ngroups * (ncpus / nv->ngroups);
-
- /* Spread allocated groups on CPUs of the current node */
- for (v = 0; v < nv->ngroups; v++, curgrp++) {
- cpus_per_grp = ncpus / nv->ngroups;
-
- /* Account for extra groups to compensate rounding errors */
- if (extra_grps) {
- cpus_per_grp++;
- --extra_grps;
- }
-
- /*
- * wrapping has to be considered given 'startgrp'
- * may start anywhere
- */
- if (curgrp >= last_grp)
- curgrp = 0;
- grp_spread_init_one(&masks[curgrp], nmsk,
- cpus_per_grp);
+ if (__try_group_cluster_cpus(ncpus, nv->ngroups, nmsk,
+ masks, &curgrp, last_grp)) {
+ done += nv->ngroups;
+ continue;
}
+
+ assign_cpus_to_groups(ncpus, nmsk, nv, masks, &curgrp,
+ last_grp);
done += nv->ngroups;
}
kfree(node_groups);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from wangyang.guo@intel.com are
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-01-09 22:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-09 22:48 [to-be-updated] lib-group_cpus-make-group-cpu-cluster-aware.patch removed from -mm tree Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.