From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
jpb@kernel.org, praan@google.com, miko.lenczewski@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate IOTLB cache tag if no id to reuse
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 12:29:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260127162908.GL1134360@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aXfpaN4UCYcY9W8T@Asurada-Nvidia>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 02:23:36PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 05:06:40PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 05:24:22PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > @@ -3220,6 +3241,9 @@ arm_smmu_master_build_inv(struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> > > break;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /* Set a default users counter */
> > > + refcount_set(&cur->users, 1);
> >
> > I think abusing users here is a little too hard to read..
> >
> > Can we just keep track in the state somehow with a flag?
> >
> > Or maybe union in a "bool needs_free" that is for the on-stack version
> > of this structure?
>
> This doesn't only apply to the case when a tag is newly allocated
> during the attach, but it can be used when an old tag has users=0
> during a detach, right?
Oh, IDK, I didn't look so closely..
I though this was just about cleaning up the tag during attach, the
detach flow worked differently and did use users = 0?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 1:24 [PATCH v2 00/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Share domain across SMMU/vSMMU instances Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Store IOTLB cache tags in struct arm_smmu_attach_state Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 20:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 3:23 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 15:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 16:58 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass in IOTLB cache tag to CD and STE Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 20:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 3:28 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Look for existing iotlb tag in smmu_domain->invs Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 2:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate IOTLB cache tag if no id to reuse Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-26 22:23 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 16:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-01-27 16:52 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Flush iotlb in arm_smmu_iotlb_tag_free() Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 2:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 15:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate vmid in arm_vsmmu_init Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 3:06 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 15:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 17:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 17:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass in vsmmu to arm_smmu_domain_get_iotlb_tag() Nicolin Chen
2026-01-26 21:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 3:34 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce INV_TYPE_S2_VMID_VSMMU Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 15:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove ASID/VMID from arm_smmu_domain Nicolin Chen
2026-01-22 1:24 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow sharing domain across SMMUs Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 15:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 17:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-01-27 17:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260127162908.GL1134360@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jpb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.