From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv@isrc.iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gaohan@iscas.ac.cn, me@ziyao.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: Add sdhci support for Canaan k230
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 19:19:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260205-choice-require-1794796b10e5@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYRC/JVvyI6znWS6@duge-virtual-machine>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3717 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 03:13:00PM +0800, Jiayu Du wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 06:10:25PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:29:06PM +0800, Jiayu Du wrote:
> > > The Canaan k230 uses the SDHCI from Synopsys. Add compatible strings
> > > to the k230. The k230 has two controllers. MMC0 supports eMMC, while
> > > MMC1 supports SDIO.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv@isrc.iscas.ac.cn>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> > > index 7e7c55dc2440..cab33da3af7d 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ properties:
> > > - const: sophgo,sg2044-dwcmshc
> > > - const: sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc
> > > - enum:
> > > + - canaan,k230-emmc
> > > + - canaan,k230-sdio
> >
> > I don't understand why there are two compatibles here, when the driver
> > is able to handle them both identically, using the common properties for
> > mmc controllers to differentiate. Is which is emmc and which sdio
> > actually just determined by how the k230 boards use them?
> >
> > Or, if there are pinout differences, would pinctrl allow each to be used
> > for either?
>
> Hi, Thanks for the review!
>
> Actually, the two compatibles aren't just board choices. They come from
> real SoC-level differences between the two MMC controllers.
>
> From the K230 Hardware Guide [1]:
> - MMC0 supports eMMC5.0 and SDIO3.0, usually for eMMC chips.
> - MMC1 only does SDIO3.0 in 4/1-bit mode up to SDR104, and the manual
> clearly says it can't handle eMMC because of pin count and limits.
>
> And the driver treats them a bit differently, such as whether there
> is a phy and the initialization method. So I think keeping separate
> compatibles makes sense to show these hardware differences clearly.
Ah, I didn't notice that there was some logic, I just checked the match
data and I missed that. What you have is fine then I think.
>
> About pinctrl, MMC1 pins can mux to other things like GPIO, but MMC0
> pins are fixed in hardware. In next version, I will add pinctrl node
> for MMC1 in the board dts.
>
> Link: https://github.com/kendryte/k230_docs/blob/main/en/00_hardware/K230_Hardware_Design_Guide.md#mmc-circuit [1]
> >
> > > - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc
> > > - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc
> > > - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci
> > > @@ -87,6 +89,26 @@ required:
> > > allOf:
> > > - $ref: mmc-controller.yaml#
> > >
> > > + - if:
> > > + properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + contains:
> > > + enum:
> > > + - canaan,k230-emmc
> > > + - canaan,k230-sdio
> > > + then:
> > > + properties:
> > > + clocks:
> > > + minItems: 2
> > > + maxItems: 5
Additionally, why does this have a range? Why is it not minItems: 5?
You've got only one instance per compatible, so the number of clocks for
each compatible is not variable.
> > > + clock-names:
> > > + items:
> > > + - const: core
> > > + - const: bus
> > > + - const: axi
> > > + - const: block
> > > + - const: timer
> > > +
> > > - if:
> > > properties:
> > > compatible:
> > > --
> > > 2.52.0
> > >
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv@isrc.iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, pjw@kernel.org,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gaohan@iscas.ac.cn, me@ziyao.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: Add sdhci support for Canaan k230
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 19:19:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260205-choice-require-1794796b10e5@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYRC/JVvyI6znWS6@duge-virtual-machine>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3717 bytes --]
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 03:13:00PM +0800, Jiayu Du wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 06:10:25PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:29:06PM +0800, Jiayu Du wrote:
> > > The Canaan k230 uses the SDHCI from Synopsys. Add compatible strings
> > > to the k230. The k230 has two controllers. MMC0 supports eMMC, while
> > > MMC1 supports SDIO.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv@isrc.iscas.ac.cn>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> > > index 7e7c55dc2440..cab33da3af7d 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ properties:
> > > - const: sophgo,sg2044-dwcmshc
> > > - const: sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc
> > > - enum:
> > > + - canaan,k230-emmc
> > > + - canaan,k230-sdio
> >
> > I don't understand why there are two compatibles here, when the driver
> > is able to handle them both identically, using the common properties for
> > mmc controllers to differentiate. Is which is emmc and which sdio
> > actually just determined by how the k230 boards use them?
> >
> > Or, if there are pinout differences, would pinctrl allow each to be used
> > for either?
>
> Hi, Thanks for the review!
>
> Actually, the two compatibles aren't just board choices. They come from
> real SoC-level differences between the two MMC controllers.
>
> From the K230 Hardware Guide [1]:
> - MMC0 supports eMMC5.0 and SDIO3.0, usually for eMMC chips.
> - MMC1 only does SDIO3.0 in 4/1-bit mode up to SDR104, and the manual
> clearly says it can't handle eMMC because of pin count and limits.
>
> And the driver treats them a bit differently, such as whether there
> is a phy and the initialization method. So I think keeping separate
> compatibles makes sense to show these hardware differences clearly.
Ah, I didn't notice that there was some logic, I just checked the match
data and I missed that. What you have is fine then I think.
>
> About pinctrl, MMC1 pins can mux to other things like GPIO, but MMC0
> pins are fixed in hardware. In next version, I will add pinctrl node
> for MMC1 in the board dts.
>
> Link: https://github.com/kendryte/k230_docs/blob/main/en/00_hardware/K230_Hardware_Design_Guide.md#mmc-circuit [1]
> >
> > > - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc
> > > - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc
> > > - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci
> > > @@ -87,6 +89,26 @@ required:
> > > allOf:
> > > - $ref: mmc-controller.yaml#
> > >
> > > + - if:
> > > + properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + contains:
> > > + enum:
> > > + - canaan,k230-emmc
> > > + - canaan,k230-sdio
> > > + then:
> > > + properties:
> > > + clocks:
> > > + minItems: 2
> > > + maxItems: 5
Additionally, why does this have a range? Why is it not minItems: 5?
You've got only one instance per compatible, so the number of clocks for
each compatible is not variable.
> > > + clock-names:
> > > + items:
> > > + - const: core
> > > + - const: bus
> > > + - const: axi
> > > + - const: block
> > > + - const: timer
> > > +
> > > - if:
> > > properties:
> > > compatible:
> > > --
> > > 2.52.0
> > >
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-04 8:29 [PATCH 0/3] Add SDHCI support for Canaan K230 SoC Jiayu Du
2026-02-04 8:29 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-04 8:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: Add sdhci support for Canaan k230 Jiayu Du
2026-02-04 8:29 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-04 18:10 ` Conor Dooley
2026-02-04 18:10 ` Conor Dooley
2026-02-05 7:13 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-05 7:13 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-05 19:19 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2026-02-05 19:19 ` Conor Dooley
2026-02-06 2:56 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-06 2:56 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-04 8:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-dwcmshc: Add Canaan K230 DWCMSHC controller support Jiayu Du
2026-02-04 8:29 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-04 9:43 ` Yao Zi
2026-02-04 9:43 ` Yao Zi
2026-02-06 13:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-06 13:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-07 8:45 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-07 8:45 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-07 9:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-07 9:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-02-08 15:44 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-08 15:44 ` Jiayu Du
2026-02-04 8:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] riscv: dts: canaan: Add mmc nodes for K230 Jiayu Du
2026-02-04 8:29 ` Jiayu Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260205-choice-require-1794796b10e5@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gaohan@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=jiayu.riscv@isrc.iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=me@ziyao.cc \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.