From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 15/17] selftests/bpf: Remove test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 14:29:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260205222916.1788211-16-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205222916.1788211-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Remove a test in test_maps that checks if the updating of the percpu
counter in task local storage map is preemption safe as the percpu
counter is now removed.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
.../bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c | 128 ------------------
.../bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c | 38 ------
2 files changed, 166 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c
deleted file mode 100644
index a4121d2248ac..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/task_storage_map.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-/* Copyright (C) 2022. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
-#define _GNU_SOURCE
-#include <sched.h>
-#include <unistd.h>
-#include <stdlib.h>
-#include <stdbool.h>
-#include <errno.h>
-#include <string.h>
-#include <pthread.h>
-
-#include <bpf/bpf.h>
-#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
-
-#include "bpf_util.h"
-#include "test_maps.h"
-#include "task_local_storage_helpers.h"
-#include "read_bpf_task_storage_busy.skel.h"
-
-struct lookup_ctx {
- bool start;
- bool stop;
- int pid_fd;
- int map_fd;
- int loop;
-};
-
-static void *lookup_fn(void *arg)
-{
- struct lookup_ctx *ctx = arg;
- long value;
- int i = 0;
-
- while (!ctx->start)
- usleep(1);
-
- while (!ctx->stop && i++ < ctx->loop)
- bpf_map_lookup_elem(ctx->map_fd, &ctx->pid_fd, &value);
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static void abort_lookup(struct lookup_ctx *ctx, pthread_t *tids, unsigned int nr)
-{
- unsigned int i;
-
- ctx->stop = true;
- ctx->start = true;
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
- pthread_join(tids[i], NULL);
-}
-
-void test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup(void)
-{
-#define MAX_NR_THREAD 4096
- unsigned int i, nr = 256, loop = 8192, cpu = 0;
- struct read_bpf_task_storage_busy *skel;
- pthread_t tids[MAX_NR_THREAD];
- struct lookup_ctx ctx;
- cpu_set_t old, new;
- const char *cfg;
- int err;
-
- cfg = getenv("TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_THREAD");
- if (cfg) {
- nr = atoi(cfg);
- if (nr > MAX_NR_THREAD)
- nr = MAX_NR_THREAD;
- }
- cfg = getenv("TASK_STORAGE_MAP_NR_LOOP");
- if (cfg)
- loop = atoi(cfg);
- cfg = getenv("TASK_STORAGE_MAP_PIN_CPU");
- if (cfg)
- cpu = atoi(cfg);
-
- skel = read_bpf_task_storage_busy__open_and_load();
- err = libbpf_get_error(skel);
- CHECK(err, "open_and_load", "error %d\n", err);
-
- /* Only for a fully preemptible kernel */
- if (!skel->kconfig->CONFIG_PREEMPTION) {
- printf("%s SKIP (no CONFIG_PREEMPTION)\n", __func__);
- read_bpf_task_storage_busy__destroy(skel);
- skips++;
- return;
- }
-
- /* Save the old affinity setting */
- sched_getaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(old), &old);
-
- /* Pinned on a specific CPU */
- CPU_ZERO(&new);
- CPU_SET(cpu, &new);
- sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(new), &new);
-
- ctx.start = false;
- ctx.stop = false;
- ctx.pid_fd = sys_pidfd_open(getpid(), 0);
- ctx.map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.task);
- ctx.loop = loop;
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
- err = pthread_create(&tids[i], NULL, lookup_fn, &ctx);
- if (err) {
- abort_lookup(&ctx, tids, i);
- CHECK(err, "pthread_create", "error %d\n", err);
- goto out;
- }
- }
-
- ctx.start = true;
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
- pthread_join(tids[i], NULL);
-
- skel->bss->pid = getpid();
- err = read_bpf_task_storage_busy__attach(skel);
- CHECK(err, "attach", "error %d\n", err);
-
- /* Trigger program */
- sys_gettid();
- skel->bss->pid = 0;
-
- CHECK(skel->bss->busy != 0, "bad bpf_task_storage_busy", "got %d\n", skel->bss->busy);
-out:
- read_bpf_task_storage_busy__destroy(skel);
- /* Restore affinity setting */
- sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(old), &old);
- printf("%s:PASS\n", __func__);
-}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 69da05bb6c63..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/read_bpf_task_storage_busy.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-/* Copyright (C) 2022. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
-#include "vmlinux.h"
-#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
-#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
-
-extern bool CONFIG_PREEMPTION __kconfig __weak;
-extern const int bpf_task_storage_busy __ksym;
-
-char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-
-int pid = 0;
-int busy = 0;
-
-struct {
- __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE);
- __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
- __type(key, int);
- __type(value, long);
-} task SEC(".maps");
-
-SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
-int BPF_PROG(read_bpf_task_storage_busy)
-{
- int *value;
-
- if (!CONFIG_PREEMPTION)
- return 0;
-
- if (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32 != pid)
- return 0;
-
- value = bpf_this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_task_storage_busy);
- if (value)
- busy = *value;
-
- return 0;
-}
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-05 22:28 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/17] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/17] bpf: Select bpf_local_storage_map_bucket based on bpf_local_storage Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_link_map " Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink " Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/17] bpf: Change local_storage->lock and b->lock to rqspinlock Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/17] bpf: Remove task local storage percpu counter Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/17] bpf: Remove cgroup " Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/17] bpf: Remove unused percpu counter from bpf_local_storage_map_free Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/17] bpf: Prepare for bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/17] bpf: Support lockless unlink when freeing map or local storage Amery Hung
2026-02-06 23:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/17] bpf: Switch to bpf_selem_unlink_nofail in bpf_local_storage_{map_free, destroy} Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 12/17] selftests/bpf: Update sk_storage_omem_uncharge test Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 13/17] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/recursion test Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 14/17] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/task_storage_nodeadlock test Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 16/17] selftests/bpf: Choose another percpu variable in bpf for btf_dump test Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 17/17] selftests/bpf: Fix outdated test on storage->smap Amery Hung
2026-02-06 23:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/17] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260205222916.1788211-16-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.