From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
martin.lau@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 02/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 14:29:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260205222916.1788211-3-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205222916.1788211-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
To prepare for changing bpf_local_storage_map_bucket::lock to rqspinlock,
convert bpf_selem_unlink_map() to failable. It still always succeeds and
returns 0 for now.
Since some operations updating local storage cannot fail in the middle,
open-code bpf_selem_unlink_map() to take the b->lock before the
operation. There are two such locations:
- bpf_local_storage_alloc()
The first selem will be unlinked from smap if cmpxchg owner_storage_ptr
fails, which should not fail. Therefore, hold b->lock when linking
until allocation complete. Helpers that assume b->lock is held by
callers are introduced: bpf_selem_link_map_nolock() and
bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock().
- bpf_local_storage_update()
The three step update process: link_map(new_selem),
link_storage(new_selem), and unlink_map(old_selem) should not fail in
the middle.
In bpf_selem_unlink(), bpf_selem_unlink_map() and
bpf_selem_unlink_storage() should either all succeed or fail as a whole
instead of failing in the middle. So, return if unlink_map() failed.
Remove the selem_linked_to_map_lockless() check as an selem in the
common paths (not bpf_local_storage_map_free() or
bpf_local_storage_destroy()), will be unlinked under b->lock and
local_storage->lock and therefore no other threads can unlink the selem
from map at the same time.
In bpf_local_storage_destroy(), ignore the return of
bpf_selem_unlink_map() for now. A later patch will allow
bpf_local_storage_destroy() to unlink selems even when failing to
acquire locks.
Note that while this patch removes all callers of selem_linked_to_map(),
a later patch that introduces bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() will use it
again.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 91b28f4e3130..6fa71502c7d7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -61,11 +61,6 @@ static bool selem_linked_to_storage(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->snode);
}
-static bool selem_linked_to_map_lockless(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
-{
- return !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&selem->map_node);
-}
-
static bool selem_linked_to_map(const struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
{
return !hlist_unhashed(&selem->map_node);
@@ -347,25 +342,27 @@ void bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->snode, &local_storage->list);
}
-static void bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+static int bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
{
struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
unsigned long flags;
- if (unlikely(!selem_linked_to_map_lockless(selem)))
- /* selem has already be unlinked from smap */
- return;
-
local_storage = rcu_dereference_check(selem->local_storage,
bpf_rcu_lock_held());
smap = rcu_dereference_check(SDATA(selem)->smap, bpf_rcu_lock_held());
b = select_bucket(smap, local_storage);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
- if (likely(selem_linked_to_map(selem)))
- hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
}
void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
@@ -381,13 +378,24 @@ void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
}
+static void bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b,
+ struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->map_node, &b->list);
+}
+
void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
{
+ int err;
+
/* Always unlink from map before unlinking from local_storage
* because selem will be freed after successfully unlinked from
* the local_storage.
*/
- bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
+ err = bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
+ if (err)
+ return;
+
bpf_selem_unlink_storage(selem, reuse_now);
}
@@ -429,6 +437,8 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
{
struct bpf_local_storage *prev_storage, *storage;
struct bpf_local_storage **owner_storage_ptr;
+ struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
+ unsigned long flags;
int err;
err = mem_charge(smap, owner, sizeof(*storage));
@@ -453,7 +463,10 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
storage->use_kmalloc_nolock = smap->use_kmalloc_nolock;
bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(storage, first_selem);
- bpf_selem_link_map(smap, storage, first_selem);
+
+ b = select_bucket(smap, storage);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
+ bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(b, first_selem);
owner_storage_ptr =
(struct bpf_local_storage **)owner_storage(smap, owner);
@@ -469,10 +482,12 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
*/
prev_storage = cmpxchg(owner_storage_ptr, NULL, storage);
if (unlikely(prev_storage)) {
- bpf_selem_unlink_map(first_selem);
+ bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(first_selem);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
err = -EAGAIN;
goto uncharge;
}
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
return 0;
@@ -494,8 +509,9 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
struct bpf_local_storage_data *old_sdata = NULL;
struct bpf_local_storage_elem *alloc_selem, *selem = NULL;
struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
+ struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
HLIST_HEAD(old_selem_free_list);
- unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long flags, b_flags;
int err;
/* BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST cannot be both set */
@@ -579,20 +595,25 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
goto unlock;
}
+ b = select_bucket(smap, local_storage);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, b_flags);
+
alloc_selem = NULL;
/* First, link the new selem to the map */
- bpf_selem_link_map(smap, local_storage, selem);
+ bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(b, selem);
/* Second, link (and publish) the new selem to local_storage */
bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(local_storage, selem);
/* Third, remove old selem, SELEM(old_sdata) */
if (old_sdata) {
- bpf_selem_unlink_map(SELEM(old_sdata));
+ bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(SELEM(old_sdata));
bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(local_storage, SELEM(old_sdata),
&old_selem_free_list);
}
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, b_flags);
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local_storage->lock, flags);
bpf_selem_free_list(&old_selem_free_list, false);
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-05 22:28 [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/17] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 01/17] bpf: Select bpf_local_storage_map_bucket based on bpf_local_storage Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_link_map to failable Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 04/17] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink " Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/17] bpf: Change local_storage->lock and b->lock to rqspinlock Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 06/17] bpf: Remove task local storage percpu counter Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 07/17] bpf: Remove cgroup " Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 08/17] bpf: Remove unused percpu counter from bpf_local_storage_map_free Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 09/17] bpf: Prepare for bpf_selem_unlink_nofail() Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 10/17] bpf: Support lockless unlink when freeing map or local storage Amery Hung
2026-02-06 23:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 11/17] bpf: Switch to bpf_selem_unlink_nofail in bpf_local_storage_{map_free, destroy} Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 12/17] selftests/bpf: Update sk_storage_omem_uncharge test Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 13/17] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/recursion test Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 14/17] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/task_storage_nodeadlock test Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 15/17] selftests/bpf: Remove test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 16/17] selftests/bpf: Choose another percpu variable in bpf for btf_dump test Amery Hung
2026-02-05 22:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 17/17] selftests/bpf: Fix outdated test on storage->smap Amery Hung
2026-02-06 23:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 00/17] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260205222916.1788211-3-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.