All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Koichiro Den" <den@valinux.co.jp>,
	"Shinichiro Kawasaki" <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: ep: Fix regression in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq()
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:39:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260210203949.GA47027@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYuToukP3STMF6Tj@ryzen>

On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 09:22:58PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 01:32:05PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> ...

> > Isn't there still a race between host updates of PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_*
> > and endpoint reads of those registers?  We can't prevent the host
> > from updating PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_* between dw_pcie_ep_map_addr() and
> > the writel(), so maybe it's impossible to prevent the theoretical
> > race there, and all we can really do is mitigate what we expect to
> > be a single change at boot time of the host?
> 
> Normally, the MSI target address is not changed during runtime.
> 
> The spec allows changing the MSI-X address/data pair when the
> corresponding vector is *masked*, and classifies the behavior as
> undefined if address/data pair gets changed while the vector is
> *unmasked*.
> 
> AFAICT, it does not mention anything for MSI, so I do not think it
> is allowed to be changed during runtime.
> 
> The only reason why it is changed here is because UEFI/BIOS will
> have one MSI target address, and then once Linux boots, it will use
> another MSI target address. (So it only changes once.)

Yes, hence "we expect a single change at boot time of the host" above.

> > Even for that single change, it looks like the host could update
> > PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_* simultaneously with dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(),
> > leading to mapping a half-updated msg_addr.  This part we *could*
> > prevent by re-reading PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_* to detect a partial
> > update.
> 
> The problem that commit 8719c64e76bf ("PCI: dwc: ep: Cache MSI
> outbound iATU mapping") fixes is that the DWC controller does not
> handle when the outbound iATU is re-programmed when there are
> ongoing outbound transactions.

The scenario I'm asking about is the following, where the single
change of MSI target as the host boots is concurrent with
dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq()::

  - host writes PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_LO

  - dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq() reads PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_LO and
    PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_HI

  - dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq() maps msg_addr built from an old
    PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_HI and a new PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_LO

  - host writes PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_HI

This could be mitigated by re-reading PCI_MSI_ADDRESS_* to detect the
tearing.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-10 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-10 18:12 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: ep: Fix regression in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq() Niklas Cassel
2026-02-10 19:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-02-10 20:22   ` Niklas Cassel
2026-02-10 20:33     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-02-10 20:39     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-02-11  8:52       ` Niklas Cassel
2026-02-11 18:08         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-02-25 14:59     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-02-11 16:44 ` Koichiro Den
2026-02-12  9:42 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-25 15:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-02-25 15:51   ` Niklas Cassel
2026-02-25 16:30     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-02-25 20:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-02-25 21:56   ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260210203949.GA47027@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.