From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use fsverity_verify_blocks() instead of fsverity_verify_page()
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:33:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260214203311.9759-2-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260214203311.9759-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Replace the only remaining caller of fsverity_verify_page() with the
equivalent direct call to fsverity_verify_blocks(). No functional
change. This will allow fsverity_verify_page() to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/compress.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
index 006a80acd1de..6d688835387d 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
@@ -1815,11 +1815,12 @@ static void f2fs_verify_cluster(struct work_struct *work)
struct page *rpage = dic->rpages[i];
if (!rpage)
continue;
- if (fsverity_verify_page(dic->vi, rpage))
+ if (fsverity_verify_blocks(dic->vi, page_folio(rpage),
+ PAGE_SIZE, 0))
SetPageUptodate(rpage);
else
ClearPageUptodate(rpage);
unlock_page(rpage);
}
--
2.53.0
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use fsverity_verify_blocks() instead of fsverity_verify_page()
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2026 12:33:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260214203311.9759-2-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260214203311.9759-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Replace the only remaining caller of fsverity_verify_page() with the
equivalent direct call to fsverity_verify_blocks(). No functional
change. This will allow fsverity_verify_page() to be removed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/compress.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
index 006a80acd1de..6d688835387d 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
@@ -1815,11 +1815,12 @@ static void f2fs_verify_cluster(struct work_struct *work)
struct page *rpage = dic->rpages[i];
if (!rpage)
continue;
- if (fsverity_verify_page(dic->vi, rpage))
+ if (fsverity_verify_blocks(dic->vi, page_folio(rpage),
+ PAGE_SIZE, 0))
SetPageUptodate(rpage);
else
ClearPageUptodate(rpage);
unlock_page(rpage);
}
--
2.53.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-14 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-14 20:33 [PATCH 0/2] fsverity: remove fsverity_verify_page() Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 20:33 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-14 20:33 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-02-14 20:33 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: use fsverity_verify_blocks() instead of fsverity_verify_page() Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-14 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-14 20:39 ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2026-02-14 20:48 ` Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 20:48 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-02-14 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-02-14 20:55 ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2026-02-14 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] fsverity: remove fsverity_verify_page() Eric Biggers
2026-02-14 20:33 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260214203311.9759-2-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.