* [PATCH v6 0/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support
@ 2026-02-15 18:21 Ekansh Gupta
2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure Ekansh Gupta
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-15 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: srini, linux-arm-msm
Cc: gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd,
dmitry.baryshkov
This patch series adds polling mode feature that have been missing in
upstream FastRPC driver.
- Add changes to move fdlist to ctx structure to avoid code duplicacy.
- Update context mask to support polling mode.
- Add changes to support polling feature.
Userspace change: https://github.com/qualcomm/fastrpc/pull/258
Patch [v5]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251230062831.1195116-1-ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com/
Changes in v5:
- Fixed poll memory calculation.
- Added few formatting changes.
Changes in v5:
- Add more details in commit text.
Changes in v4:
- Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK.
- Fixed commit text.
Changes in v3:
- Resolve compilation warning.
Changes in v2:
- Added comments and fixed commit text.
- Defined context id position as a macro.
- Added new IOCTL to control polling mode as always enabling
it might cause excess power consumption.
- Cleaned up polling mode implementation.
Ekansh Gupta (4):
misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure
misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK
misc: fastrpc: Expand context ID mask for DSP polling mode support
misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver
drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h | 10 +++
2 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure 2026-02-15 18:21 [PATCH v6 0/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-15 18:21 ` Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-16 3:56 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK Ekansh Gupta ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-15 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: srini, linux-arm-msm Cc: gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov The fdlist is currently part of the meta buffer, computed during put_args. This leads to code duplication when preparing and reading critical meta buffer contents used by the FastRPC driver. Move fdlist to the invoke context structure to improve maintainability and reduce redundancy. This centralizes its handling and simplifies meta buffer preparation and reading logic. Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> --- drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 16 +++++----------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c index 4f5a79c50f58..ce397c687161 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx { int pid; int client_id; u32 sc; + u64 *fdlist; u32 *crc; u64 ctxid; u64 msg_sz; @@ -1018,6 +1019,7 @@ static int fastrpc_get_args(u32 kernel, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) rpra = ctx->buf->virt; list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars); pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars); + ctx->fdlist = (u64 *)(pages + ctx->nscalars); args = (uintptr_t)ctx->buf->virt + metalen; rlen = pkt_size - metalen; ctx->rpra = rpra; @@ -1120,18 +1122,10 @@ static int fastrpc_put_args(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, union fastrpc_remote_arg *rpra = ctx->rpra; struct fastrpc_user *fl = ctx->fl; struct fastrpc_map *mmap = NULL; - struct fastrpc_invoke_buf *list; - struct fastrpc_phy_page *pages; - u64 *fdlist; - int i, inbufs, outbufs, handles; + int i, inbufs; int ret = 0; inbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_INBUFS(ctx->sc); - outbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTBUFS(ctx->sc); - handles = REMOTE_SCALARS_INHANDLES(ctx->sc) + REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTHANDLES(ctx->sc); - list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars); - pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars); - fdlist = (uint64_t *)(pages + inbufs + outbufs + handles); for (i = inbufs; i < ctx->nbufs; ++i) { if (!ctx->maps[i]) { @@ -1153,9 +1147,9 @@ static int fastrpc_put_args(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, cleanup_fdlist: /* Clean up fdlist which is updated by DSP */ for (i = 0; i < FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST; i++) { - if (!fdlist[i]) + if (!ctx->fdlist[i]) break; - if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)fdlist[i], &mmap)) + if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)ctx->fdlist[i], &mmap)) fastrpc_map_put(mmap); } -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-16 3:56 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-16 9:19 ` Ekansh Gupta 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2026-02-16 3:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ekansh Gupta Cc: srini, linux-arm-msm, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:32PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > The fdlist is currently part of the meta buffer, Do you mean "already part of"? > computed during > put_args. The only "computation" I can see wrt fdlist in fastrpc_put_args() is where we calculate it to be at pages + inbufs + outbufs + handles. So, why do you say that the content of the meta buffer is calculated there? Did you mean fastrpc_get_args()? PS. Use full function names and suffix them with (), to be clear in your description. > This leads to code duplication when preparing and reading > critical meta buffer contents used by the FastRPC driver. "used by the whole entire FastRPC driver" is rather broad... As far as I can tell, the thing this patch is doing is caching the "fdlist" address, to avoid having to derive "pages" (and thereby indirectly "list"), "outbufs", "handles", and then sum these up. > > Move fdlist to the invoke context structure to improve maintainability > and reduce redundancy. This centralizes its handling and simplifies > meta buffer preparation and reading logic. I think the patch looks good, but your commit message is too high-level sales pitch. Describe the specific problem that you're solving (i.e. you're recalculating the offset which was known at the time of fastrpc_get_args()) and leave it at that. > > Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 16 +++++----------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c > index 4f5a79c50f58..ce397c687161 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c > @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx { > int pid; > int client_id; > u32 sc; > + u64 *fdlist; > u32 *crc; > u64 ctxid; > u64 msg_sz; > @@ -1018,6 +1019,7 @@ static int fastrpc_get_args(u32 kernel, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) > rpra = ctx->buf->virt; > list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars); > pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars); > + ctx->fdlist = (u64 *)(pages + ctx->nscalars); > args = (uintptr_t)ctx->buf->virt + metalen; > rlen = pkt_size - metalen; > ctx->rpra = rpra; > @@ -1120,18 +1122,10 @@ static int fastrpc_put_args(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, > union fastrpc_remote_arg *rpra = ctx->rpra; > struct fastrpc_user *fl = ctx->fl; > struct fastrpc_map *mmap = NULL; > - struct fastrpc_invoke_buf *list; > - struct fastrpc_phy_page *pages; > - u64 *fdlist; > - int i, inbufs, outbufs, handles; > + int i, inbufs; > int ret = 0; > > inbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_INBUFS(ctx->sc); > - outbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTBUFS(ctx->sc); > - handles = REMOTE_SCALARS_INHANDLES(ctx->sc) + REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTHANDLES(ctx->sc); > - list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars); > - pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars); > - fdlist = (uint64_t *)(pages + inbufs + outbufs + handles); > > for (i = inbufs; i < ctx->nbufs; ++i) { > if (!ctx->maps[i]) { > @@ -1153,9 +1147,9 @@ static int fastrpc_put_args(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, > cleanup_fdlist: > /* Clean up fdlist which is updated by DSP */ > for (i = 0; i < FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST; i++) { > - if (!fdlist[i]) > + if (!ctx->fdlist[i]) It wouldn't hurt to keep the local fdlist variable, keeps the code less noisy - and you don't need to change these two places. > break; > - if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)fdlist[i], &mmap)) > + if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)ctx->fdlist[i], &mmap)) Why are the fds stored as u64 in the metadata? Are the actual fd numbers somehow consumed by the DSP side? Regards, Bjorn > fastrpc_map_put(mmap); > } > > -- > 2.34.1 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure 2026-02-16 3:56 ` Bjorn Andersson @ 2026-02-16 9:19 ` Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-18 14:15 ` Bjorn Andersson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-16 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: srini, linux-arm-msm, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov On 2/16/2026 9:26 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:32PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: >> The fdlist is currently part of the meta buffer, > Do you mean "already part of"? yes. > >> computed during >> put_args. > The only "computation" I can see wrt fdlist in fastrpc_put_args() is > where we calculate it to be at pages + inbufs + outbufs + handles. > > So, why do you say that the content of the meta buffer is calculated > there? Did you mean fastrpc_get_args()? The fdlist is updated by DSP. By "computation", I meant getting the location of fdlist in metadata buffer. fastrpc_get_args allocates metadata buffer, fdlist is at some offset in this buffer. This list is updated by the DSP and rechecked during fastrpc_put_args for any entries. > > PS. Use full function names and suffix them with (), to be clear in your > description. Ack. > >> This leads to code duplication when preparing and reading >> critical meta buffer contents used by the FastRPC driver. > "used by the whole entire FastRPC driver" is rather broad... > > As far as I can tell, the thing this patch is doing is caching the > "fdlist" address, to avoid having to derive "pages" (and thereby > indirectly "list"), "outbufs", "handles", and then sum these up. > >> Move fdlist to the invoke context structure to improve maintainability >> and reduce redundancy. This centralizes its handling and simplifies >> meta buffer preparation and reading logic. > I think the patch looks good, but your commit message is too high-level > sales pitch. > > Describe the specific problem that you're solving (i.e. you're > recalculating the offset which was known at the time of > fastrpc_get_args()) and leave it at that. I see the problem with the commit text. Let me come with a better description. > >> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 16 +++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c >> index 4f5a79c50f58..ce397c687161 100644 >> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c >> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c >> @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx { >> int pid; >> int client_id; >> u32 sc; >> + u64 *fdlist; >> u32 *crc; >> u64 ctxid; >> u64 msg_sz; >> @@ -1018,6 +1019,7 @@ static int fastrpc_get_args(u32 kernel, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) >> rpra = ctx->buf->virt; >> list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars); >> pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars); >> + ctx->fdlist = (u64 *)(pages + ctx->nscalars); >> args = (uintptr_t)ctx->buf->virt + metalen; >> rlen = pkt_size - metalen; >> ctx->rpra = rpra; >> @@ -1120,18 +1122,10 @@ static int fastrpc_put_args(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, >> union fastrpc_remote_arg *rpra = ctx->rpra; >> struct fastrpc_user *fl = ctx->fl; >> struct fastrpc_map *mmap = NULL; >> - struct fastrpc_invoke_buf *list; >> - struct fastrpc_phy_page *pages; >> - u64 *fdlist; >> - int i, inbufs, outbufs, handles; >> + int i, inbufs; >> int ret = 0; >> >> inbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_INBUFS(ctx->sc); >> - outbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTBUFS(ctx->sc); >> - handles = REMOTE_SCALARS_INHANDLES(ctx->sc) + REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTHANDLES(ctx->sc); >> - list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars); >> - pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars); >> - fdlist = (uint64_t *)(pages + inbufs + outbufs + handles); >> >> for (i = inbufs; i < ctx->nbufs; ++i) { >> if (!ctx->maps[i]) { >> @@ -1153,9 +1147,9 @@ static int fastrpc_put_args(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, >> cleanup_fdlist: >> /* Clean up fdlist which is updated by DSP */ >> for (i = 0; i < FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST; i++) { >> - if (!fdlist[i]) >> + if (!ctx->fdlist[i]) > It wouldn't hurt to keep the local fdlist variable, keeps the code less > noisy - and you don't need to change these two places. Ack. > >> break; >> - if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)fdlist[i], &mmap)) >> + if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)ctx->fdlist[i], &mmap)) > Why are the fds stored as u64 in the metadata? Are the actual fd numbers > somehow consumed by the DSP side? DSP uses it for book-keeping mostly for maintaining DSP side mapping based on fd. Thanks for spending time on reviewing this change. I'll fix your concerns in the next spin. //Ekansh > > Regards, > Bjorn > >> fastrpc_map_put(mmap); >> } >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure 2026-02-16 9:19 ` Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-18 14:15 ` Bjorn Andersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2026-02-18 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ekansh Gupta Cc: srini, linux-arm-msm, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 02:49:36PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > > > On 2/16/2026 9:26 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:32PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > >> The fdlist is currently part of the meta buffer, > > Do you mean "already part of"? > yes. > > > >> computed during > >> put_args. > > The only "computation" I can see wrt fdlist in fastrpc_put_args() is > > where we calculate it to be at pages + inbufs + outbufs + handles. > > > > So, why do you say that the content of the meta buffer is calculated > > there? Did you mean fastrpc_get_args()? > The fdlist is updated by DSP. By "computation", I meant getting the location of fdlist > in metadata buffer. > > fastrpc_get_args allocates metadata buffer, fdlist is at some offset in this buffer. This > list is updated by the DSP and rechecked during fastrpc_put_args for any entries. Does that mean that fastrpc_get_args() and fastrpc_put_args() aren't symmetrical? What is the life cycle for the mappings then? Can a buffer be "passed" to the DSP in one invoke only to be "returned" in a later invoke? > > > > PS. Use full function names and suffix them with (), to be clear in your > > description. > Ack. > > > >> This leads to code duplication when preparing and reading > >> critical meta buffer contents used by the FastRPC driver. > > "used by the whole entire FastRPC driver" is rather broad... > > > > As far as I can tell, the thing this patch is doing is caching the > > "fdlist" address, to avoid having to derive "pages" (and thereby > > indirectly "list"), "outbufs", "handles", and then sum these up. > > > >> Move fdlist to the invoke context structure to improve maintainability > >> and reduce redundancy. This centralizes its handling and simplifies > >> meta buffer preparation and reading logic. > > I think the patch looks good, but your commit message is too high-level > > sales pitch. > > > > Describe the specific problem that you're solving (i.e. you're > > recalculating the offset which was known at the time of > > fastrpc_get_args()) and leave it at that. > I see the problem with the commit text. Let me come with a better description. Thank you. > > > >> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> > >> --- [..] > >> @@ -1153,9 +1147,9 @@ static int fastrpc_put_args(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, > >> cleanup_fdlist: > >> /* Clean up fdlist which is updated by DSP */ > >> for (i = 0; i < FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST; i++) { > >> - if (!fdlist[i]) > >> + if (!ctx->fdlist[i]) > > It wouldn't hurt to keep the local fdlist variable, keeps the code less > > noisy - and you don't need to change these two places. > Ack. > > > >> break; > >> - if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)fdlist[i], &mmap)) > >> + if (!fastrpc_map_lookup(fl, (int)ctx->fdlist[i], &mmap)) > > Why are the fds stored as u64 in the metadata? Are the actual fd numbers > > somehow consumed by the DSP side? > DSP uses it for book-keeping mostly for maintaining DSP side mapping based on fd. > Okay, so then the size is part of the ABI. Thanks for clarifying. Regards, Bjorn > Thanks for spending time on reviewing this change. I'll fix your concerns in the next spin. > > //Ekansh > > > > Regards, > > Bjorn > > > >> fastrpc_map_put(mmap); > >> } > >> > >> -- > >> 2.34.1 > >> > >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK 2026-02-15 18:21 [PATCH v6 0/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-15 18:21 ` Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-16 2:39 ` kernel test robot 2026-02-16 3:13 ` kernel test robot 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] misc: fastrpc: Expand context ID mask for DSP polling mode support Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver Ekansh Gupta 3 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-15 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: srini, linux-arm-msm Cc: gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov, Konrad Dybcio Replace the hardcoded context ID mask (0xFF0) with GENMASK(11, 4) to improve readability and follow kernel bitfield conventions. Use FIELD_PREP and FIELD_GET instead of manual shifts for setting and extracting ctxid values. Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> --- drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c index ce397c687161..0d8d89a2e220 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ #define FASTRPC_CTX_MAX (256) #define FASTRPC_INIT_HANDLE 1 #define FASTRPC_DSP_UTILITIES_HANDLE 2 -#define FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK (0xFF0) +#define FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK GENMASK(11, 4) #define INIT_FILELEN_MAX (2 * 1024 * 1024) #define INIT_FILE_NAMELEN_MAX (128) #define FASTRPC_DEVICE_NAME "fastrpc" @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static void fastrpc_context_free(struct kref *ref) fastrpc_buf_free(ctx->buf); spin_lock_irqsave(&cctx->lock, flags); - idr_remove(&cctx->ctx_idr, ctx->ctxid >> 4); + idr_remove(&cctx->ctx_idr, FIELD_GET(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ctx->ctxid)); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags); kfree(ctx->maps); @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *fastrpc_context_alloc( spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags); goto err_idr; } - ctx->ctxid = ret << 4; + ctx->ctxid = FIELD_PREP(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ret); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags); kref_init(&ctx->refcount); @@ -2506,7 +2506,7 @@ static int fastrpc_rpmsg_callback(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, if (len < sizeof(*rsp)) return -EINVAL; - ctxid = ((rsp->ctx & FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK) >> 4); + ctxid = FIELD_GET(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, rsp->ctx); spin_lock_irqsave(&cctx->lock, flags); ctx = idr_find(&cctx->ctx_idr, ctxid); -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-16 2:39 ` kernel test robot 2026-02-16 11:08 ` Konrad Dybcio 2026-02-16 3:13 ` kernel test robot 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: kernel test robot @ 2026-02-16 2:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ekansh Gupta, srini, linux-arm-msm Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov, Konrad Dybcio Hi Ekansh, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing] [also build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-next char-misc/char-misc-linus linus/master v6.19 next-20260213] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ekansh-Gupta/misc-fastrpc-Move-fdlist-to-invoke-context-structure/20260216-022305 base: char-misc/char-misc-testing patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260215182136.3995111-3-ekansh.gupta%40oss.qualcomm.com patch subject: [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK config: hexagon-randconfig-001-20260216 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260216/202602161009.M2K52X34-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 23.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e86750b29fa0ff207cd43213d66dabe565417638) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260216/202602161009.M2K52X34-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602161009.M2K52X34-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c:518:29: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_GET'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 518 | idr_remove(&cctx->ctx_idr, FIELD_GET(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ctx->ctxid)); | ^ >> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c:654:15: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_PREP'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 654 | ctx->ctxid = FIELD_PREP(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ret); | ^ drivers/misc/fastrpc.c:2509:10: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_GET'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 2509 | ctxid = FIELD_GET(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, rsp->ctx); | ^ 3 errors generated. vim +/FIELD_GET +518 drivers/misc/fastrpc.c 500 501 static void fastrpc_context_free(struct kref *ref) 502 { 503 struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx; 504 struct fastrpc_channel_ctx *cctx; 505 unsigned long flags; 506 int i; 507 508 ctx = container_of(ref, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx, refcount); 509 cctx = ctx->cctx; 510 511 for (i = 0; i < ctx->nbufs; i++) 512 fastrpc_map_put(ctx->maps[i]); 513 514 if (ctx->buf) 515 fastrpc_buf_free(ctx->buf); 516 517 spin_lock_irqsave(&cctx->lock, flags); > 518 idr_remove(&cctx->ctx_idr, FIELD_GET(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ctx->ctxid)); 519 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags); 520 521 kfree(ctx->maps); 522 kfree(ctx->olaps); 523 kfree(ctx); 524 525 fastrpc_channel_ctx_put(cctx); 526 } 527 528 static void fastrpc_context_get(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) 529 { 530 kref_get(&ctx->refcount); 531 } 532 533 static void fastrpc_context_put(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) 534 { 535 kref_put(&ctx->refcount, fastrpc_context_free); 536 } 537 538 static void fastrpc_context_put_wq(struct work_struct *work) 539 { 540 struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx = 541 container_of(work, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx, put_work); 542 543 fastrpc_context_put(ctx); 544 } 545 546 #define CMP(aa, bb) ((aa) == (bb) ? 0 : (aa) < (bb) ? -1 : 1) 547 static int olaps_cmp(const void *a, const void *b) 548 { 549 struct fastrpc_buf_overlap *pa = (struct fastrpc_buf_overlap *)a; 550 struct fastrpc_buf_overlap *pb = (struct fastrpc_buf_overlap *)b; 551 /* sort with lowest starting buffer first */ 552 int st = CMP(pa->start, pb->start); 553 /* sort with highest ending buffer first */ 554 int ed = CMP(pb->end, pa->end); 555 556 return st == 0 ? ed : st; 557 } 558 559 static void fastrpc_get_buff_overlaps(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) 560 { 561 u64 max_end = 0; 562 int i; 563 564 for (i = 0; i < ctx->nbufs; ++i) { 565 ctx->olaps[i].start = ctx->args[i].ptr; 566 ctx->olaps[i].end = ctx->olaps[i].start + ctx->args[i].length; 567 ctx->olaps[i].raix = i; 568 } 569 570 sort(ctx->olaps, ctx->nbufs, sizeof(*ctx->olaps), olaps_cmp, NULL); 571 572 for (i = 0; i < ctx->nbufs; ++i) { 573 /* Falling inside previous range */ 574 if (ctx->olaps[i].start < max_end) { 575 ctx->olaps[i].mstart = max_end; 576 ctx->olaps[i].mend = ctx->olaps[i].end; 577 ctx->olaps[i].offset = max_end - ctx->olaps[i].start; 578 579 if (ctx->olaps[i].end > max_end) { 580 max_end = ctx->olaps[i].end; 581 } else { 582 ctx->olaps[i].mend = 0; 583 ctx->olaps[i].mstart = 0; 584 } 585 586 } else { 587 ctx->olaps[i].mend = ctx->olaps[i].end; 588 ctx->olaps[i].mstart = ctx->olaps[i].start; 589 ctx->olaps[i].offset = 0; 590 max_end = ctx->olaps[i].end; 591 } 592 } 593 } 594 595 static struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *fastrpc_context_alloc( 596 struct fastrpc_user *user, u32 kernel, u32 sc, 597 struct fastrpc_invoke_args *args) 598 { 599 struct fastrpc_channel_ctx *cctx = user->cctx; 600 struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx = NULL; 601 unsigned long flags; 602 int ret; 603 604 ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); 605 if (!ctx) 606 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); 607 608 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->node); 609 ctx->fl = user; 610 ctx->nscalars = REMOTE_SCALARS_LENGTH(sc); 611 ctx->nbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_INBUFS(sc) + 612 REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTBUFS(sc); 613 614 if (ctx->nscalars) { 615 ctx->maps = kcalloc(ctx->nscalars, 616 sizeof(*ctx->maps), GFP_KERNEL); 617 if (!ctx->maps) { 618 kfree(ctx); 619 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); 620 } 621 ctx->olaps = kcalloc(ctx->nscalars, 622 sizeof(*ctx->olaps), GFP_KERNEL); 623 if (!ctx->olaps) { 624 kfree(ctx->maps); 625 kfree(ctx); 626 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); 627 } 628 ctx->args = args; 629 fastrpc_get_buff_overlaps(ctx); 630 } 631 632 /* Released in fastrpc_context_put() */ 633 fastrpc_channel_ctx_get(cctx); 634 635 ctx->sc = sc; 636 ctx->retval = -1; 637 ctx->pid = current->pid; 638 ctx->client_id = user->client_id; 639 ctx->cctx = cctx; 640 init_completion(&ctx->work); 641 INIT_WORK(&ctx->put_work, fastrpc_context_put_wq); 642 643 spin_lock(&user->lock); 644 list_add_tail(&ctx->node, &user->pending); 645 spin_unlock(&user->lock); 646 647 spin_lock_irqsave(&cctx->lock, flags); 648 ret = idr_alloc_cyclic(&cctx->ctx_idr, ctx, 1, 649 FASTRPC_CTX_MAX, GFP_ATOMIC); 650 if (ret < 0) { 651 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags); 652 goto err_idr; 653 } > 654 ctx->ctxid = FIELD_PREP(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ret); 655 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags); 656 657 kref_init(&ctx->refcount); 658 659 return ctx; 660 err_idr: 661 spin_lock(&user->lock); 662 list_del(&ctx->node); 663 spin_unlock(&user->lock); 664 fastrpc_channel_ctx_put(cctx); 665 kfree(ctx->maps); 666 kfree(ctx->olaps); 667 kfree(ctx); 668 669 return ERR_PTR(ret); 670 } 671 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK 2026-02-16 2:39 ` kernel test robot @ 2026-02-16 11:08 ` Konrad Dybcio 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Konrad Dybcio @ 2026-02-16 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: kernel test robot, Ekansh Gupta, srini, linux-arm-msm Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov On 2/16/26 3:39 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Ekansh, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: > > [auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing] > [also build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-next char-misc/char-misc-linus linus/master v6.19 next-20260213] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ekansh-Gupta/misc-fastrpc-Move-fdlist-to-invoke-context-structure/20260216-022305 > base: char-misc/char-misc-testing > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260215182136.3995111-3-ekansh.gupta%40oss.qualcomm.com > patch subject: [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK > config: hexagon-randconfig-001-20260216 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260216/202602161009.M2K52X34-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 23.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e86750b29fa0ff207cd43213d66dabe565417638) > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260216/202602161009.M2K52X34-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602161009.M2K52X34-lkp@intel.com/ > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >>> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c:518:29: error: call to undeclared function 'FIELD_GET'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 518 | idr_remove(&cctx->ctx_idr, FIELD_GET(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ctx->ctxid)); #include <linux/bitops.h> Konrad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-16 2:39 ` kernel test robot @ 2026-02-16 3:13 ` kernel test robot 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: kernel test robot @ 2026-02-16 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ekansh Gupta, srini, linux-arm-msm Cc: oe-kbuild-all, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov, Konrad Dybcio Hi Ekansh, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-testing] [also build test ERROR on char-misc/char-misc-next char-misc/char-misc-linus linus/master v6.19 next-20260213] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ekansh-Gupta/misc-fastrpc-Move-fdlist-to-invoke-context-structure/20260216-022305 base: char-misc/char-misc-testing patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260215182136.3995111-3-ekansh.gupta%40oss.qualcomm.com patch subject: [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK config: sh-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260216/202602161130.5b7COBet-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260216/202602161130.5b7COBet-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602161130.5b7COBet-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/misc/fastrpc.c: In function 'fastrpc_context_free': >> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c:518:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 518 | idr_remove(&cctx->ctx_idr, FIELD_GET(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ctx->ctxid)); | ^~~~~~~~~ drivers/misc/fastrpc.c: In function 'fastrpc_context_alloc': >> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c:654:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_PREP' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 654 | ctx->ctxid = FIELD_PREP(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ret); | ^~~~~~~~~~ vim +/FIELD_GET +518 drivers/misc/fastrpc.c 500 501 static void fastrpc_context_free(struct kref *ref) 502 { 503 struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx; 504 struct fastrpc_channel_ctx *cctx; 505 unsigned long flags; 506 int i; 507 508 ctx = container_of(ref, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx, refcount); 509 cctx = ctx->cctx; 510 511 for (i = 0; i < ctx->nbufs; i++) 512 fastrpc_map_put(ctx->maps[i]); 513 514 if (ctx->buf) 515 fastrpc_buf_free(ctx->buf); 516 517 spin_lock_irqsave(&cctx->lock, flags); > 518 idr_remove(&cctx->ctx_idr, FIELD_GET(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ctx->ctxid)); 519 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags); 520 521 kfree(ctx->maps); 522 kfree(ctx->olaps); 523 kfree(ctx); 524 525 fastrpc_channel_ctx_put(cctx); 526 } 527 528 static void fastrpc_context_get(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) 529 { 530 kref_get(&ctx->refcount); 531 } 532 533 static void fastrpc_context_put(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) 534 { 535 kref_put(&ctx->refcount, fastrpc_context_free); 536 } 537 538 static void fastrpc_context_put_wq(struct work_struct *work) 539 { 540 struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx = 541 container_of(work, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx, put_work); 542 543 fastrpc_context_put(ctx); 544 } 545 546 #define CMP(aa, bb) ((aa) == (bb) ? 0 : (aa) < (bb) ? -1 : 1) 547 static int olaps_cmp(const void *a, const void *b) 548 { 549 struct fastrpc_buf_overlap *pa = (struct fastrpc_buf_overlap *)a; 550 struct fastrpc_buf_overlap *pb = (struct fastrpc_buf_overlap *)b; 551 /* sort with lowest starting buffer first */ 552 int st = CMP(pa->start, pb->start); 553 /* sort with highest ending buffer first */ 554 int ed = CMP(pb->end, pa->end); 555 556 return st == 0 ? ed : st; 557 } 558 559 static void fastrpc_get_buff_overlaps(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) 560 { 561 u64 max_end = 0; 562 int i; 563 564 for (i = 0; i < ctx->nbufs; ++i) { 565 ctx->olaps[i].start = ctx->args[i].ptr; 566 ctx->olaps[i].end = ctx->olaps[i].start + ctx->args[i].length; 567 ctx->olaps[i].raix = i; 568 } 569 570 sort(ctx->olaps, ctx->nbufs, sizeof(*ctx->olaps), olaps_cmp, NULL); 571 572 for (i = 0; i < ctx->nbufs; ++i) { 573 /* Falling inside previous range */ 574 if (ctx->olaps[i].start < max_end) { 575 ctx->olaps[i].mstart = max_end; 576 ctx->olaps[i].mend = ctx->olaps[i].end; 577 ctx->olaps[i].offset = max_end - ctx->olaps[i].start; 578 579 if (ctx->olaps[i].end > max_end) { 580 max_end = ctx->olaps[i].end; 581 } else { 582 ctx->olaps[i].mend = 0; 583 ctx->olaps[i].mstart = 0; 584 } 585 586 } else { 587 ctx->olaps[i].mend = ctx->olaps[i].end; 588 ctx->olaps[i].mstart = ctx->olaps[i].start; 589 ctx->olaps[i].offset = 0; 590 max_end = ctx->olaps[i].end; 591 } 592 } 593 } 594 595 static struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *fastrpc_context_alloc( 596 struct fastrpc_user *user, u32 kernel, u32 sc, 597 struct fastrpc_invoke_args *args) 598 { 599 struct fastrpc_channel_ctx *cctx = user->cctx; 600 struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx = NULL; 601 unsigned long flags; 602 int ret; 603 604 ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); 605 if (!ctx) 606 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); 607 608 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->node); 609 ctx->fl = user; 610 ctx->nscalars = REMOTE_SCALARS_LENGTH(sc); 611 ctx->nbufs = REMOTE_SCALARS_INBUFS(sc) + 612 REMOTE_SCALARS_OUTBUFS(sc); 613 614 if (ctx->nscalars) { 615 ctx->maps = kcalloc(ctx->nscalars, 616 sizeof(*ctx->maps), GFP_KERNEL); 617 if (!ctx->maps) { 618 kfree(ctx); 619 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); 620 } 621 ctx->olaps = kcalloc(ctx->nscalars, 622 sizeof(*ctx->olaps), GFP_KERNEL); 623 if (!ctx->olaps) { 624 kfree(ctx->maps); 625 kfree(ctx); 626 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); 627 } 628 ctx->args = args; 629 fastrpc_get_buff_overlaps(ctx); 630 } 631 632 /* Released in fastrpc_context_put() */ 633 fastrpc_channel_ctx_get(cctx); 634 635 ctx->sc = sc; 636 ctx->retval = -1; 637 ctx->pid = current->pid; 638 ctx->client_id = user->client_id; 639 ctx->cctx = cctx; 640 init_completion(&ctx->work); 641 INIT_WORK(&ctx->put_work, fastrpc_context_put_wq); 642 643 spin_lock(&user->lock); 644 list_add_tail(&ctx->node, &user->pending); 645 spin_unlock(&user->lock); 646 647 spin_lock_irqsave(&cctx->lock, flags); 648 ret = idr_alloc_cyclic(&cctx->ctx_idr, ctx, 1, 649 FASTRPC_CTX_MAX, GFP_ATOMIC); 650 if (ret < 0) { 651 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags); 652 goto err_idr; 653 } > 654 ctx->ctxid = FIELD_PREP(FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK, ret); 655 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cctx->lock, flags); 656 657 kref_init(&ctx->refcount); 658 659 return ctx; 660 err_idr: 661 spin_lock(&user->lock); 662 list_del(&ctx->node); 663 spin_unlock(&user->lock); 664 fastrpc_channel_ctx_put(cctx); 665 kfree(ctx->maps); 666 kfree(ctx->olaps); 667 kfree(ctx); 668 669 return ERR_PTR(ret); 670 } 671 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 3/4] misc: fastrpc: Expand context ID mask for DSP polling mode support 2026-02-15 18:21 [PATCH v6 0/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-15 18:21 ` Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver Ekansh Gupta 3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-15 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: srini, linux-arm-msm Cc: gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov Current FastRPC context uses a 12-bit mask: [ID(8 bits)][PD type(4 bits)] = GENMASK(11, 4) This works for normal calls but fails for DSP polling mode. Polling mode expects a 16-bit layout: [15:8] = context ID (8 bits) [7:5] = reserved [4] = async mode bit [3:0] = PD type (4 bits) If async bit (bit 4) is set, DSP disables polling. With current mask, odd IDs can set this bit, causing DSP to skip poll updates. Update FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK to GENMASK(15, 8) so IDs occupy upper byte and lower byte is left for DSP flags and PD type. Reserved bits remain unused. This change is compatible with polling mode and does not break non-polling behavior. Bit layout: [15:8] = CCCCCCCC (context ID) [7:5] = xxx (reserved) [4] = A (async mode) [3:0] = PPPP (PD type) Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> --- drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c index 0d8d89a2e220..e935ae3776b4 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ #define FASTRPC_CTX_MAX (256) #define FASTRPC_INIT_HANDLE 1 #define FASTRPC_DSP_UTILITIES_HANDLE 2 -#define FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK GENMASK(11, 4) +#define FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK GENMASK(15, 8) #define INIT_FILELEN_MAX (2 * 1024 * 1024) #define INIT_FILE_NAMELEN_MAX (128) #define FASTRPC_DEVICE_NAME "fastrpc" -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver 2026-02-15 18:21 [PATCH v6 0/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support Ekansh Gupta ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] misc: fastrpc: Expand context ID mask for DSP polling mode support Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-15 18:21 ` Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-16 3:21 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-19 7:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 3 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-15 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: srini, linux-arm-msm Cc: gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov For any remote call to DSP, after sending an invocation message, fastRPC driver waits for glink response and during this time the CPU can go into low power modes. This adds latency to overall fastrpc call as CPU wakeup and scheduling latencies are included. Add polling mode support with which fastRPC driver will poll continuously on a memory after sending a message to remote subsystem which will eliminate CPU wakeup and scheduling latencies and reduce fastRPC overhead. Poll mode can be enabled by user by using FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION ioctl request with FASTRPC_POLL_MODE request id. Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> --- drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h | 10 +++ 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c index e935ae3776b4..c1e67dbacf2c 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ #include <uapi/misc/fastrpc.h> #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> #include <linux/bits.h> +#include <linux/compiler.h> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> #define ADSP_DOMAIN_ID (0) #define MDSP_DOMAIN_ID (1) @@ -37,6 +39,7 @@ #define FASTRPC_CTX_MAX (256) #define FASTRPC_INIT_HANDLE 1 #define FASTRPC_DSP_UTILITIES_HANDLE 2 +#define FASTRPC_MAX_STATIC_HANDLE (20) #define FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK GENMASK(15, 8) #define INIT_FILELEN_MAX (2 * 1024 * 1024) #define INIT_FILE_NAMELEN_MAX (128) @@ -105,6 +108,12 @@ #define miscdev_to_fdevice(d) container_of(d, struct fastrpc_device, miscdev) +/* Poll response number from remote processor for call completion */ +#define FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE (0xdecaf) + +/* Polling mode timeout limit */ +#define FASTRPC_POLL_MAX_TIMEOUT_US (10000) + struct fastrpc_phy_page { dma_addr_t addr; /* dma address */ u64 size; /* size of contiguous region */ @@ -235,8 +244,14 @@ struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx { u32 sc; u64 *fdlist; u32 *crc; + /* Poll memory that DSP updates */ + u32 *poll; u64 ctxid; u64 msg_sz; + /* work done status flag */ + bool is_work_done; + /* process updates poll memory instead of glink response */ + bool is_polled; struct kref refcount; struct list_head node; /* list of ctxs */ struct completion work; @@ -307,6 +322,8 @@ struct fastrpc_user { int client_id; int pd; bool is_secure_dev; + /* Flags poll mode state */ + bool poll_mode; /* Lock for lists */ spinlock_t lock; /* lock for allocations */ @@ -924,7 +941,8 @@ static int fastrpc_get_meta_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) sizeof(struct fastrpc_invoke_buf) + sizeof(struct fastrpc_phy_page)) * ctx->nscalars + sizeof(u64) * FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST + - sizeof(u32) * FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST; + sizeof(u32) * FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST + + sizeof(u32); return size; } @@ -1020,6 +1038,9 @@ static int fastrpc_get_args(u32 kernel, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars); pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars); ctx->fdlist = (u64 *)(pages + ctx->nscalars); + ctx->poll = (u32 *)((uintptr_t)ctx->fdlist + sizeof(u64) * FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST + + sizeof(u32) * FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST); + args = (uintptr_t)ctx->buf->virt + metalen; rlen = pkt_size - metalen; ctx->rpra = rpra; @@ -1188,6 +1209,75 @@ static int fastrpc_invoke_send(struct fastrpc_session_ctx *sctx, } +static inline u32 fastrpc_poll_op(void *p) +{ + struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx = p; + + dma_rmb(); + return READ_ONCE(*ctx->poll); +} + +static int poll_for_remote_response(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) +{ + u32 val; + int ret; + + /* + * Poll until DSP writes FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE into *ctx->poll + * or until another path marks the work done. + */ + ret = read_poll_timeout_atomic(fastrpc_poll_op, val, + (val == FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE) || + ctx->is_work_done, 1, + FASTRPC_POLL_MAX_TIMEOUT_US, false, ctx); + + if (!ret && val == FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE) { + ctx->is_work_done = true; + ctx->retval = 0; + } + + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) + ret = -EIO; + + return ret; +} + +static inline int fastrpc_wait_for_response(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, + u32 kernel) +{ + int err = 0; + + if (kernel) { + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctx->work, 10 * HZ)) + err = -ETIMEDOUT; + } else { + err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ctx->work); + } + + return err; +} + +static int fastrpc_wait_for_completion(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, + u32 kernel) +{ + int err; + + do { + if (ctx->is_polled) { + err = poll_for_remote_response(ctx); + /* If polling timed out, move to normal response mode */ + if (err) + ctx->is_polled = false; + } else { + err = fastrpc_wait_for_response(ctx, kernel); + if (err) + return err; + } + } while (!ctx->is_work_done); + + return err; +} + static int fastrpc_internal_invoke(struct fastrpc_user *fl, u32 kernel, u32 handle, u32 sc, struct fastrpc_invoke_args *args) @@ -1223,16 +1313,26 @@ static int fastrpc_internal_invoke(struct fastrpc_user *fl, u32 kernel, if (err) goto bail; - if (kernel) { - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctx->work, 10 * HZ)) - err = -ETIMEDOUT; - } else { - err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ctx->work); - } + /* + * Set message context as polled if the call is for a user PD + * dynamic module and user has enabled poll mode. + */ + if (handle > FASTRPC_MAX_STATIC_HANDLE && fl->pd == USER_PD && + fl->poll_mode) + ctx->is_polled = true; + + err = fastrpc_wait_for_completion(ctx, kernel); if (err) goto bail; + if (!ctx->is_work_done) { + err = -ETIMEDOUT; + dev_dbg(fl->sctx->dev, "Invalid workdone state for handle 0x%x, sc 0x%x\n", + handle, sc); + goto bail; + } + /* make sure that all memory writes by DSP are seen by CPU */ dma_rmb(); /* populate all the output buffers with results */ @@ -1812,6 +1912,30 @@ static int fastrpc_get_info_from_kernel(struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability *cap, return 0; } +static int fastrpc_set_option(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) +{ + struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option opt = {0}; + int i; + + if (copy_from_user(&opt, argp, sizeof(opt))) + return -EFAULT; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opt.reserved); i++) { + if (opt.reserved[i] != 0) + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (opt.req != FASTRPC_POLL_MODE) + return -EINVAL; + + if (opt.value) + fl->poll_mode = true; + else + fl->poll_mode = false; + + return 0; +} + static int fastrpc_get_dsp_info(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) { struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability cap = {0}; @@ -2167,6 +2291,9 @@ static long fastrpc_device_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, case FASTRPC_IOCTL_MEM_UNMAP: err = fastrpc_req_mem_unmap(fl, argp); break; + case FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION: + err = fastrpc_set_option(fl, argp); + break; case FASTRPC_IOCTL_GET_DSP_INFO: err = fastrpc_get_dsp_info(fl, argp); break; @@ -2518,6 +2645,7 @@ static int fastrpc_rpmsg_callback(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, } ctx->retval = rsp->retval; + ctx->is_work_done = true; complete(&ctx->work); /* diff --git a/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h b/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h index c6e2925f47e6..c37e24a764ae 100644 --- a/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h +++ b/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_INIT_CREATE_STATIC _IOWR('R', 9, struct fastrpc_init_create_static) #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_MEM_MAP _IOWR('R', 10, struct fastrpc_mem_map) #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_MEM_UNMAP _IOWR('R', 11, struct fastrpc_mem_unmap) +#define FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION _IOWR('R', 12, struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option) #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_GET_DSP_INFO _IOWR('R', 13, struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability) /** @@ -67,6 +68,9 @@ enum fastrpc_proc_attr { /* Fastrpc attribute for memory protection of buffers */ #define FASTRPC_ATTR_SECUREMAP (1) +/* Set option request ID to enable poll mode */ +#define FASTRPC_POLL_MODE (1) + struct fastrpc_invoke_args { __u64 ptr; __u64 length; @@ -133,6 +137,12 @@ struct fastrpc_mem_unmap { __s32 reserved[5]; }; +struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option { + __u32 req; /* request id */ + __u32 value; /* value */ + __s32 reserved[6]; +}; + struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability { __u32 unused; /* deprecated, ignored by the kernel */ __u32 attribute_id; -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-16 3:21 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-16 9:06 ` Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-19 7:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2026-02-16 3:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ekansh Gupta Cc: srini, linux-arm-msm, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:35PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > For any remote call to DSP, after sending an invocation message, > fastRPC driver waits for glink response and during this time the > CPU can go into low power modes. This adds latency to overall fastrpc > call as CPU wakeup and scheduling latencies are included. Add polling > mode support with which fastRPC driver will poll continuously on a > memory after sending a message to remote subsystem which will eliminate > CPU wakeup and scheduling latencies and reduce fastRPC overhead. Poll > mode can be enabled by user by using FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION ioctl > request with FASTRPC_POLL_MODE request id. > > Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h | 10 +++ > 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c > index e935ae3776b4..c1e67dbacf2c 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ > #include <uapi/misc/fastrpc.h> > #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> > #include <linux/bits.h> > +#include <linux/compiler.h> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h> > > #define ADSP_DOMAIN_ID (0) > #define MDSP_DOMAIN_ID (1) > @@ -37,6 +39,7 @@ > #define FASTRPC_CTX_MAX (256) > #define FASTRPC_INIT_HANDLE 1 > #define FASTRPC_DSP_UTILITIES_HANDLE 2 > +#define FASTRPC_MAX_STATIC_HANDLE (20) > #define FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK GENMASK(15, 8) > #define INIT_FILELEN_MAX (2 * 1024 * 1024) > #define INIT_FILE_NAMELEN_MAX (128) > @@ -105,6 +108,12 @@ > > #define miscdev_to_fdevice(d) container_of(d, struct fastrpc_device, miscdev) > > +/* Poll response number from remote processor for call completion */ > +#define FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE (0xdecaf) > + > +/* Polling mode timeout limit */ > +#define FASTRPC_POLL_MAX_TIMEOUT_US (10000) > + > struct fastrpc_phy_page { > dma_addr_t addr; /* dma address */ > u64 size; /* size of contiguous region */ > @@ -235,8 +244,14 @@ struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx { > u32 sc; > u64 *fdlist; > u32 *crc; > + /* Poll memory that DSP updates */ > + u32 *poll; > u64 ctxid; > u64 msg_sz; > + /* work done status flag */ > + bool is_work_done; > + /* process updates poll memory instead of glink response */ > + bool is_polled; > struct kref refcount; > struct list_head node; /* list of ctxs */ > struct completion work; > @@ -307,6 +322,8 @@ struct fastrpc_user { > int client_id; > int pd; > bool is_secure_dev; > + /* Flags poll mode state */ > + bool poll_mode; > /* Lock for lists */ > spinlock_t lock; > /* lock for allocations */ > @@ -924,7 +941,8 @@ static int fastrpc_get_meta_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) > sizeof(struct fastrpc_invoke_buf) + > sizeof(struct fastrpc_phy_page)) * ctx->nscalars + > sizeof(u64) * FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST + > - sizeof(u32) * FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST; > + sizeof(u32) * FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST + > + sizeof(u32); > > return size; > } > @@ -1020,6 +1038,9 @@ static int fastrpc_get_args(u32 kernel, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) > list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars); > pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars); > ctx->fdlist = (u64 *)(pages + ctx->nscalars); > + ctx->poll = (u32 *)((uintptr_t)ctx->fdlist + sizeof(u64) * FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST + > + sizeof(u32) * FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST); > + > args = (uintptr_t)ctx->buf->virt + metalen; > rlen = pkt_size - metalen; > ctx->rpra = rpra; > @@ -1188,6 +1209,75 @@ static int fastrpc_invoke_send(struct fastrpc_session_ctx *sctx, > > } > > +static inline u32 fastrpc_poll_op(void *p) > +{ > + struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx = p; > + > + dma_rmb(); > + return READ_ONCE(*ctx->poll); > +} > + > +static int poll_for_remote_response(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) > +{ > + u32 val; > + int ret; > + > + /* > + * Poll until DSP writes FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE into *ctx->poll > + * or until another path marks the work done. > + */ > + ret = read_poll_timeout_atomic(fastrpc_poll_op, val, > + (val == FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE) || > + ctx->is_work_done, 1, Weird line wrap of the conditional, please put the val == and the ctx->is_work_done on the same line - it's just 90 characters. > + FASTRPC_POLL_MAX_TIMEOUT_US, false, ctx); > + > + if (!ret && val == FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE) { > + ctx->is_work_done = true; > + ctx->retval = 0; > + } > + > + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) > + ret = -EIO; > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static inline int fastrpc_wait_for_response(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, > + u32 kernel) > +{ > + int err = 0; > + > + if (kernel) { > + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctx->work, 10 * HZ)) > + err = -ETIMEDOUT; > + } else { > + err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ctx->work); > + } > + > + return err; > +} > + > +static int fastrpc_wait_for_completion(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, > + u32 kernel) > +{ > + int err; > + > + do { > + if (ctx->is_polled) { > + err = poll_for_remote_response(ctx); > + /* If polling timed out, move to normal response mode */ I had already written to question the lack of fallback to non-polling mode and how this would prohibit me from mixing expected long and short calls... Would certainly be nice to clarify this behavior in the commit message... > + if (err) > + ctx->is_polled = false; > + } else { > + err = fastrpc_wait_for_response(ctx, kernel); > + if (err) > + return err; > + } > + } while (!ctx->is_work_done); > + > + return err; Isn't 0 the only value of err you can get here with? > +} > + > static int fastrpc_internal_invoke(struct fastrpc_user *fl, u32 kernel, > u32 handle, u32 sc, > struct fastrpc_invoke_args *args) > @@ -1223,16 +1313,26 @@ static int fastrpc_internal_invoke(struct fastrpc_user *fl, u32 kernel, > if (err) > goto bail; > > - if (kernel) { > - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctx->work, 10 * HZ)) > - err = -ETIMEDOUT; > - } else { > - err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ctx->work); > - } > + /* > + * Set message context as polled if the call is for a user PD > + * dynamic module and user has enabled poll mode. > + */ > + if (handle > FASTRPC_MAX_STATIC_HANDLE && fl->pd == USER_PD && > + fl->poll_mode) The line is 85 characters if you don't break it. You're allowed to use up to 100 characters if it makes the code easier to read - and it does. > + ctx->is_polled = true; > + > + err = fastrpc_wait_for_completion(ctx, kernel); > Ugly blank line between the assignment and error check... > if (err) > goto bail; > > + if (!ctx->is_work_done) { "err" is the return value of the wait, and this checks the outcome of the wait... Returning "success" and pass "failure" through a sideband channel is confusing. That said, as far as I can see, there are three ways fastrpc_wait_for_completion() can exit: 1) err = 0 && ctx->is_work_done = true after polling 2) err = 0 && ctx->is_work_done = true after wait 3) err != 0 && ctx->is_work_done is undefined after wait For #1 and #2 we won't hit either if statement here. For #3 we already hit above condition and went to bail. So do we ever enter here? > + err = -ETIMEDOUT; > + dev_dbg(fl->sctx->dev, "Invalid workdone state for handle 0x%x, sc 0x%x\n", > + handle, sc); jfyi, you can use %#x to format 0x%x > + goto bail; > + } > + > /* make sure that all memory writes by DSP are seen by CPU */ > dma_rmb(); > /* populate all the output buffers with results */ > @@ -1812,6 +1912,30 @@ static int fastrpc_get_info_from_kernel(struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability *cap, > return 0; > } > > +static int fastrpc_set_option(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) > +{ > + struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option opt = {0}; > + int i; > + > + if (copy_from_user(&opt, argp, sizeof(opt))) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opt.reserved); i++) { > + if (opt.reserved[i] != 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (opt.req != FASTRPC_POLL_MODE) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (opt.value) Would it make sense to allow the caller to affect the poll timeout using the other 31 bits of this value? Regards, Bjorn > + fl->poll_mode = true; > + else > + fl->poll_mode = false; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int fastrpc_get_dsp_info(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) > { > struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability cap = {0}; > @@ -2167,6 +2291,9 @@ static long fastrpc_device_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > case FASTRPC_IOCTL_MEM_UNMAP: > err = fastrpc_req_mem_unmap(fl, argp); > break; > + case FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION: > + err = fastrpc_set_option(fl, argp); > + break; > case FASTRPC_IOCTL_GET_DSP_INFO: > err = fastrpc_get_dsp_info(fl, argp); > break; > @@ -2518,6 +2645,7 @@ static int fastrpc_rpmsg_callback(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, > } > > ctx->retval = rsp->retval; > + ctx->is_work_done = true; > complete(&ctx->work); > > /* > diff --git a/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h b/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h > index c6e2925f47e6..c37e24a764ae 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h > +++ b/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_INIT_CREATE_STATIC _IOWR('R', 9, struct fastrpc_init_create_static) > #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_MEM_MAP _IOWR('R', 10, struct fastrpc_mem_map) > #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_MEM_UNMAP _IOWR('R', 11, struct fastrpc_mem_unmap) > +#define FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION _IOWR('R', 12, struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option) > #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_GET_DSP_INFO _IOWR('R', 13, struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability) > > /** > @@ -67,6 +68,9 @@ enum fastrpc_proc_attr { > /* Fastrpc attribute for memory protection of buffers */ > #define FASTRPC_ATTR_SECUREMAP (1) > > +/* Set option request ID to enable poll mode */ > +#define FASTRPC_POLL_MODE (1) > + > struct fastrpc_invoke_args { > __u64 ptr; > __u64 length; > @@ -133,6 +137,12 @@ struct fastrpc_mem_unmap { > __s32 reserved[5]; > }; > > +struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option { > + __u32 req; /* request id */ > + __u32 value; /* value */ > + __s32 reserved[6]; > +}; > + > struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability { > __u32 unused; /* deprecated, ignored by the kernel */ > __u32 attribute_id; > -- > 2.34.1 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver 2026-02-16 3:21 ` Bjorn Andersson @ 2026-02-16 9:06 ` Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-18 14:36 ` Bjorn Andersson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-16 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: srini, linux-arm-msm, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov On 2/16/2026 8:51 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:35PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: >> For any remote call to DSP, after sending an invocation message, >> fastRPC driver waits for glink response and during this time the >> CPU can go into low power modes. This adds latency to overall fastrpc >> call as CPU wakeup and scheduling latencies are included. Add polling >> mode support with which fastRPC driver will poll continuously on a >> memory after sending a message to remote subsystem which will eliminate >> CPU wakeup and scheduling latencies and reduce fastRPC overhead. Poll >> mode can be enabled by user by using FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION ioctl >> request with FASTRPC_POLL_MODE request id. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h | 10 +++ >> 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c >> index e935ae3776b4..c1e67dbacf2c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c >> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c >> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ >> #include <uapi/misc/fastrpc.h> >> #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> >> #include <linux/bits.h> >> +#include <linux/compiler.h> >> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> >> >> #define ADSP_DOMAIN_ID (0) >> #define MDSP_DOMAIN_ID (1) >> @@ -37,6 +39,7 @@ >> #define FASTRPC_CTX_MAX (256) >> #define FASTRPC_INIT_HANDLE 1 >> #define FASTRPC_DSP_UTILITIES_HANDLE 2 >> +#define FASTRPC_MAX_STATIC_HANDLE (20) >> #define FASTRPC_CTXID_MASK GENMASK(15, 8) >> #define INIT_FILELEN_MAX (2 * 1024 * 1024) >> #define INIT_FILE_NAMELEN_MAX (128) >> @@ -105,6 +108,12 @@ >> >> #define miscdev_to_fdevice(d) container_of(d, struct fastrpc_device, miscdev) >> >> +/* Poll response number from remote processor for call completion */ >> +#define FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE (0xdecaf) >> + >> +/* Polling mode timeout limit */ >> +#define FASTRPC_POLL_MAX_TIMEOUT_US (10000) >> + >> struct fastrpc_phy_page { >> dma_addr_t addr; /* dma address */ >> u64 size; /* size of contiguous region */ >> @@ -235,8 +244,14 @@ struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx { >> u32 sc; >> u64 *fdlist; >> u32 *crc; >> + /* Poll memory that DSP updates */ >> + u32 *poll; >> u64 ctxid; >> u64 msg_sz; >> + /* work done status flag */ >> + bool is_work_done; >> + /* process updates poll memory instead of glink response */ >> + bool is_polled; >> struct kref refcount; >> struct list_head node; /* list of ctxs */ >> struct completion work; >> @@ -307,6 +322,8 @@ struct fastrpc_user { >> int client_id; >> int pd; >> bool is_secure_dev; >> + /* Flags poll mode state */ >> + bool poll_mode; >> /* Lock for lists */ >> spinlock_t lock; >> /* lock for allocations */ >> @@ -924,7 +941,8 @@ static int fastrpc_get_meta_size(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) >> sizeof(struct fastrpc_invoke_buf) + >> sizeof(struct fastrpc_phy_page)) * ctx->nscalars + >> sizeof(u64) * FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST + >> - sizeof(u32) * FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST; >> + sizeof(u32) * FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST + >> + sizeof(u32); >> >> return size; >> } >> @@ -1020,6 +1038,9 @@ static int fastrpc_get_args(u32 kernel, struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) >> list = fastrpc_invoke_buf_start(rpra, ctx->nscalars); >> pages = fastrpc_phy_page_start(list, ctx->nscalars); >> ctx->fdlist = (u64 *)(pages + ctx->nscalars); >> + ctx->poll = (u32 *)((uintptr_t)ctx->fdlist + sizeof(u64) * FASTRPC_MAX_FDLIST + >> + sizeof(u32) * FASTRPC_MAX_CRCLIST); >> + >> args = (uintptr_t)ctx->buf->virt + metalen; >> rlen = pkt_size - metalen; >> ctx->rpra = rpra; >> @@ -1188,6 +1209,75 @@ static int fastrpc_invoke_send(struct fastrpc_session_ctx *sctx, >> >> } >> >> +static inline u32 fastrpc_poll_op(void *p) >> +{ >> + struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx = p; >> + >> + dma_rmb(); >> + return READ_ONCE(*ctx->poll); >> +} >> + >> +static int poll_for_remote_response(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx) >> +{ >> + u32 val; >> + int ret; >> + >> + /* >> + * Poll until DSP writes FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE into *ctx->poll >> + * or until another path marks the work done. >> + */ >> + ret = read_poll_timeout_atomic(fastrpc_poll_op, val, >> + (val == FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE) || >> + ctx->is_work_done, 1, > Weird line wrap of the conditional, please put the val == and the > ctx->is_work_done on the same line - it's just 90 characters. Ack. > >> + FASTRPC_POLL_MAX_TIMEOUT_US, false, ctx); >> + >> + if (!ret && val == FASTRPC_POLL_RESPONSE) { >> + ctx->is_work_done = true; >> + ctx->retval = 0; >> + } >> + >> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) >> + ret = -EIO; >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static inline int fastrpc_wait_for_response(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, >> + u32 kernel) >> +{ >> + int err = 0; >> + >> + if (kernel) { >> + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctx->work, 10 * HZ)) >> + err = -ETIMEDOUT; >> + } else { >> + err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ctx->work); >> + } >> + >> + return err; >> +} >> + >> +static int fastrpc_wait_for_completion(struct fastrpc_invoke_ctx *ctx, >> + u32 kernel) >> +{ >> + int err; >> + >> + do { >> + if (ctx->is_polled) { >> + err = poll_for_remote_response(ctx); >> + /* If polling timed out, move to normal response mode */ > I had already written to question the lack of fallback to non-polling > mode and how this would prohibit me from mixing expected long and short > calls... > > Would certainly be nice to clarify this behavior in the commit > message... I'll add more details for this. > >> + if (err) >> + ctx->is_polled = false; >> + } else { >> + err = fastrpc_wait_for_response(ctx, kernel); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + } >> + } while (!ctx->is_work_done); >> + >> + return err; > Isn't 0 the only value of err you can get here with? yes, it's always going to be return 0; I'll update this. > >> +} >> + >> static int fastrpc_internal_invoke(struct fastrpc_user *fl, u32 kernel, >> u32 handle, u32 sc, >> struct fastrpc_invoke_args *args) >> @@ -1223,16 +1313,26 @@ static int fastrpc_internal_invoke(struct fastrpc_user *fl, u32 kernel, >> if (err) >> goto bail; >> >> - if (kernel) { >> - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&ctx->work, 10 * HZ)) >> - err = -ETIMEDOUT; >> - } else { >> - err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ctx->work); >> - } >> + /* >> + * Set message context as polled if the call is for a user PD >> + * dynamic module and user has enabled poll mode. >> + */ >> + if (handle > FASTRPC_MAX_STATIC_HANDLE && fl->pd == USER_PD && >> + fl->poll_mode) > The line is 85 characters if you don't break it. You're allowed to use > up to 100 characters if it makes the code easier to read - and it does. Ack. > >> + ctx->is_polled = true; >> + >> + err = fastrpc_wait_for_completion(ctx, kernel); >> > Ugly blank line between the assignment and error check... I'll remove this. > >> if (err) >> goto bail; >> >> + if (!ctx->is_work_done) { > "err" is the return value of the wait, and this checks the outcome of > the wait... Returning "success" and pass "failure" through a sideband > channel is confusing. > > That said, as far as I can see, there are three ways > fastrpc_wait_for_completion() can exit: > > 1) err = 0 && ctx->is_work_done = true after polling > 2) err = 0 && ctx->is_work_done = true after wait > 3) err != 0 && ctx->is_work_done is undefined after wait > > For #1 and #2 we won't hit either if statement here. > For #3 we already hit above condition and went to bail. > > So do we ever enter here? You're right, the check is not getting encountered due to the following reasons: 1) Poll success -> err = 0, is_work_done =true. 2) Wait success -> err = 0, is_work_done =true. 3) Poll failed -> fallback to wait. 4) Wait failed -> err check before this if condition. I'll remove this check. > >> + err = -ETIMEDOUT; >> + dev_dbg(fl->sctx->dev, "Invalid workdone state for handle 0x%x, sc 0x%x\n", >> + handle, sc); > jfyi, you can use %#x to format 0x%x Ack. > >> + goto bail; >> + } >> + >> /* make sure that all memory writes by DSP are seen by CPU */ >> dma_rmb(); >> /* populate all the output buffers with results */ >> @@ -1812,6 +1912,30 @@ static int fastrpc_get_info_from_kernel(struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability *cap, >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static int fastrpc_set_option(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) >> +{ >> + struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option opt = {0}; >> + int i; >> + >> + if (copy_from_user(&opt, argp, sizeof(opt))) >> + return -EFAULT; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opt.reserved); i++) { >> + if (opt.reserved[i] != 0) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + if (opt.req != FASTRPC_POLL_MODE) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + if (opt.value) > Would it make sense to allow the caller to affect the poll timeout using > the other 31 bits of this value? I was planning to bring that control[1], but it's might be difficult for the caller [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250127044239.578540-5-quic_ekangupt@quicinc.com/ //Ekansh > > Regards, > Bjorn > >> + fl->poll_mode = true; >> + else >> + fl->poll_mode = false; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static int fastrpc_get_dsp_info(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) >> { >> struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability cap = {0}; >> @@ -2167,6 +2291,9 @@ static long fastrpc_device_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, >> case FASTRPC_IOCTL_MEM_UNMAP: >> err = fastrpc_req_mem_unmap(fl, argp); >> break; >> + case FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION: >> + err = fastrpc_set_option(fl, argp); >> + break; >> case FASTRPC_IOCTL_GET_DSP_INFO: >> err = fastrpc_get_dsp_info(fl, argp); >> break; >> @@ -2518,6 +2645,7 @@ static int fastrpc_rpmsg_callback(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, >> } >> >> ctx->retval = rsp->retval; >> + ctx->is_work_done = true; >> complete(&ctx->work); >> >> /* >> diff --git a/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h b/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h >> index c6e2925f47e6..c37e24a764ae 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h >> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ >> #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_INIT_CREATE_STATIC _IOWR('R', 9, struct fastrpc_init_create_static) >> #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_MEM_MAP _IOWR('R', 10, struct fastrpc_mem_map) >> #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_MEM_UNMAP _IOWR('R', 11, struct fastrpc_mem_unmap) >> +#define FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION _IOWR('R', 12, struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option) >> #define FASTRPC_IOCTL_GET_DSP_INFO _IOWR('R', 13, struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability) >> >> /** >> @@ -67,6 +68,9 @@ enum fastrpc_proc_attr { >> /* Fastrpc attribute for memory protection of buffers */ >> #define FASTRPC_ATTR_SECUREMAP (1) >> >> +/* Set option request ID to enable poll mode */ >> +#define FASTRPC_POLL_MODE (1) >> + >> struct fastrpc_invoke_args { >> __u64 ptr; >> __u64 length; >> @@ -133,6 +137,12 @@ struct fastrpc_mem_unmap { >> __s32 reserved[5]; >> }; >> >> +struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option { >> + __u32 req; /* request id */ >> + __u32 value; /* value */ >> + __s32 reserved[6]; >> +}; >> + >> struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability { >> __u32 unused; /* deprecated, ignored by the kernel */ >> __u32 attribute_id; >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver 2026-02-16 9:06 ` Ekansh Gupta @ 2026-02-18 14:36 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-18 14:38 ` Konrad Dybcio 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2026-02-18 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ekansh Gupta Cc: srini, linux-arm-msm, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 02:36:40PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > On 2/16/2026 8:51 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:35PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > >> @@ -1812,6 +1912,30 @@ static int fastrpc_get_info_from_kernel(struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability *cap, > >> return 0; > >> } > >> > >> +static int fastrpc_set_option(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) > >> +{ > >> + struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option opt = {0}; > >> + int i; > >> + > >> + if (copy_from_user(&opt, argp, sizeof(opt))) > >> + return -EFAULT; > >> + > >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opt.reserved); i++) { > >> + if (opt.reserved[i] != 0) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + > >> + if (opt.req != FASTRPC_POLL_MODE) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + > >> + if (opt.value) > > Would it make sense to allow the caller to affect the poll timeout using > > the other 31 bits of this value? > I was planning to bring that control[1], but it's might be difficult for the caller > Skimming through the thread, it seems you're discussing how to determine if the DSP supports polling or not; that sounds like a separate problem in my view. Not sure if you settled that discussion, but couldn't that be handled through FASTRPC_IOCTL_GET_DSP_INFO? I assume though, this would be subject to firmware changes. How do you determine downstream if polling should be used or not today? For my specific question here, I'm merely wondering if the timeout value should be a boolean or have a unit. We could punt on that question, to not block this feature from making progress upstream, by defining that only 0 and 1 are valid values today (all other result in -EINVAL). This would leave the door open for having 0 == off, 1 == default, > 1 represent the actual timeout in microseconds in the future. Treating any non-zero value as "the default timeout" means that you would have to assume that there's userspace who might pass other values and you can't add additional meaning to the field in the future. Regards, Bjorn > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250127044239.578540-5-quic_ekangupt@quicinc.com/ > > //Ekansh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver 2026-02-18 14:36 ` Bjorn Andersson @ 2026-02-18 14:38 ` Konrad Dybcio 2026-02-19 13:39 ` Bjorn Andersson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread From: Konrad Dybcio @ 2026-02-18 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson, Ekansh Gupta Cc: srini, linux-arm-msm, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov On 18-Feb-26 15:36, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 02:36:40PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: >> On 2/16/2026 8:51 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:35PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: >>>> @@ -1812,6 +1912,30 @@ static int fastrpc_get_info_from_kernel(struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability *cap, >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> >>>> +static int fastrpc_set_option(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option opt = {0}; >>>> + int i; >>>> + >>>> + if (copy_from_user(&opt, argp, sizeof(opt))) >>>> + return -EFAULT; >>>> + >>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opt.reserved); i++) { >>>> + if (opt.reserved[i] != 0) >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + if (opt.req != FASTRPC_POLL_MODE) >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> + >>>> + if (opt.value) >>> Would it make sense to allow the caller to affect the poll timeout using >>> the other 31 bits of this value? >> I was planning to bring that control[1], but it's might be difficult for the caller >> > > Skimming through the thread, it seems you're discussing how to determine > if the DSP supports polling or not; that sounds like a separate problem > in my view. Not sure if you settled that discussion, but couldn't that > be handled through FASTRPC_IOCTL_GET_DSP_INFO? > > I assume though, this would be subject to firmware changes. How do you > determine downstream if polling should be used or not today? > > > For my specific question here, I'm merely wondering if the timeout value > should be a boolean or have a unit. We could punt on that question, to > not block this feature from making progress upstream, by defining that > only 0 and 1 are valid values today (all other result in -EINVAL). > > This would leave the door open for having 0 == off, 1 == default, > 1 Giving '1' a special non-numerical meaning sounds odd.. maybe 0:default, -1:off (or the opposite)? Konrad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver 2026-02-18 14:38 ` Konrad Dybcio @ 2026-02-19 13:39 ` Bjorn Andersson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2026-02-19 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Konrad Dybcio Cc: Ekansh Gupta, srini, linux-arm-msm, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd, dmitry.baryshkov On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 03:38:28PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > On 18-Feb-26 15:36, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 02:36:40PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > >> On 2/16/2026 8:51 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > >>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:35PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > >>>> @@ -1812,6 +1912,30 @@ static int fastrpc_get_info_from_kernel(struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability *cap, > >>>> return 0; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> +static int fastrpc_set_option(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option opt = {0}; > >>>> + int i; > >>>> + > >>>> + if (copy_from_user(&opt, argp, sizeof(opt))) > >>>> + return -EFAULT; > >>>> + > >>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opt.reserved); i++) { > >>>> + if (opt.reserved[i] != 0) > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + if (opt.req != FASTRPC_POLL_MODE) > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> + > >>>> + if (opt.value) > >>> Would it make sense to allow the caller to affect the poll timeout using > >>> the other 31 bits of this value? > >> I was planning to bring that control[1], but it's might be difficult for the caller > >> > > > > Skimming through the thread, it seems you're discussing how to determine > > if the DSP supports polling or not; that sounds like a separate problem > > in my view. Not sure if you settled that discussion, but couldn't that > > be handled through FASTRPC_IOCTL_GET_DSP_INFO? > > > > I assume though, this would be subject to firmware changes. How do you > > determine downstream if polling should be used or not today? > > > > > > For my specific question here, I'm merely wondering if the timeout value > > should be a boolean or have a unit. We could punt on that question, to > > not block this feature from making progress upstream, by defining that > > only 0 and 1 are valid values today (all other result in -EINVAL). > > > > This would leave the door open for having 0 == off, 1 == default, > 1 > > Giving '1' a special non-numerical meaning sounds odd.. maybe 0:default, > -1:off (or the opposite)? > I guess it comes down to the question of how big the likelihood that you would want a different value than the default. We should provide sane defaults and avoid sprinkling unergonomic knobs throughout the system, but [0,1] and the rest of the bits reserved would leave the door open for future use of the upper 31 bits. I find 0 == "enabled" to be unintuitive... And using -1 means that the bits aren't reserved for future use. Regards, Bjorn > Konrad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-16 3:21 ` Bjorn Andersson @ 2026-02-19 7:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread From: Dmitry Baryshkov @ 2026-02-19 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ekansh Gupta Cc: srini, linux-arm-msm, gregkh, quic_bkumar, linux-kernel, quic_chennak, dri-devel, arnd On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 11:51:35PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote: > For any remote call to DSP, after sending an invocation message, > fastRPC driver waits for glink response and during this time the > CPU can go into low power modes. This adds latency to overall fastrpc > call as CPU wakeup and scheduling latencies are included. Add polling > mode support with which fastRPC driver will poll continuously on a > memory after sending a message to remote subsystem which will eliminate > CPU wakeup and scheduling latencies and reduce fastRPC overhead. Poll > mode can be enabled by user by using FASTRPC_IOCTL_SET_OPTION ioctl > request with FASTRPC_POLL_MODE request id. > > Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > include/uapi/misc/fastrpc.h | 10 +++ > 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > @@ -1812,6 +1912,30 @@ static int fastrpc_get_info_from_kernel(struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability *cap, > return 0; > } > > +static int fastrpc_set_option(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) > +{ > + struct fastrpc_ioctl_set_option opt = {0}; > + int i; > + > + if (copy_from_user(&opt, argp, sizeof(opt))) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opt.reserved); i++) { > + if (opt.reserved[i] != 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (opt.req != FASTRPC_POLL_MODE) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (opt.value) > + fl->poll_mode = true; > + else > + fl->poll_mode = false; I think I've raised this question beforehand. This implementation will return success to the userspace even on the platforms where polling is not supported. This is not correct. > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int fastrpc_get_dsp_info(struct fastrpc_user *fl, char __user *argp) > { > struct fastrpc_ioctl_capability cap = {0}; -- With best wishes Dmitry ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-19 13:39 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-02-15 18:21 [PATCH v6 0/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] misc: fastrpc: Move fdlist to invoke context structure Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-16 3:56 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-16 9:19 ` Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-18 14:15 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] misc: fastrpc: Replace hardcoded ctxid mask with GENMASK Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-16 2:39 ` kernel test robot 2026-02-16 11:08 ` Konrad Dybcio 2026-02-16 3:13 ` kernel test robot 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] misc: fastrpc: Expand context ID mask for DSP polling mode support Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-15 18:21 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] misc: fastrpc: Add polling mode support for fastRPC driver Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-16 3:21 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-16 9:06 ` Ekansh Gupta 2026-02-18 14:36 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-18 14:38 ` Konrad Dybcio 2026-02-19 13:39 ` Bjorn Andersson 2026-02-19 7:36 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.