Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc64/bpf: Implement JIT support for private stack

[kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>]

:::::: 
:::::: Manual check reason: "high confidence checkpatch report"
:::::: Manual check reason: "checkpatch report for netdev code"
:::::: 

BCC: lkp@intel.com
CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
In-Reply-To: <20260216152234.36632-1-adubey@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20260216152234.36632-1-adubey@linux.ibm.com>
TO: adubey@linux.ibm.com
TO: bpf@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
[cannot apply to bpf-next/net]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/adubey-linux-ibm-com/selftests-bpf-Enable-private-stack-tests-for-powerpc64/20260216-182353
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260216152234.36632-1-adubey%40linux.ibm.com
patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc64/bpf: Implement JIT support for private stack
:::::: branch date: 70 minutes ago
:::::: commit date: 70 minutes ago
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260216/202602161230.JTOEAOX1-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

# many are suggestions rather than must-fix

ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)"
#239: FILE: arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c:212:
+		priv_frame_ptr = (void*) ctx->priv_sp + PRIV_STACK_GUARD_SZ +

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki