From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Chen Ridong" <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect change to effective_xcpus in partition_xcpus_del()
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:54:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260221185418.29319-2-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260221185418.29319-1-longman@redhat.com>
The effective_xcpus of a cpuset can contain offline CPUs. In
partition_xcpus_del(), the xcpus parameter is incorrectly used as
a temporary cpumask to mask out offline CPUs. As xcpus can be the
effective_xcpus of a cpuset, this can result in unexpected changes
in that cpumask. Fix this problem by not making any changes to the
xcpus parameter.
Fixes: 11e5f407b64a ("cgroup/cpuset: Keep track of CPUs in isolated partitions")
Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 7607dfe516e6..4d10e320b144 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1220,8 +1220,8 @@ static void partition_xcpus_del(int old_prs, struct cpuset *parent,
isolated_cpus_update(old_prs, parent->partition_root_state,
xcpus);
- cpumask_and(xcpus, xcpus, cpu_active_mask);
cpumask_or(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, xcpus);
+ cpumask_and(parent->effective_cpus, parent->effective_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
}
/*
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-21 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-21 18:54 [PATCH v6 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix partition related locking issues Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect use of cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask() in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] cgroup/cpuset: Clarify exclusion rules for cpuset internal variables Waiman Long
2026-02-26 15:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] cgroup/cpuset: Set isolated_cpus_updating only if isolated_cpus is changed Waiman Long
2026-02-26 15:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] kselftest/cgroup: Simplify test_cpuset_prs.sh by removing "S+" command Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] cgroup/cpuset: Move housekeeping_update()/rebuild_sched_domains() together Waiman Long
2026-02-26 15:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] cgroup/cpuset: Defer housekeeping_update() calls from CPU hotplug to workqueue Waiman Long
2026-02-26 16:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 16:00 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-03 22:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-04 4:05 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-02 11:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 15:18 ` Jon Hunter
2026-03-03 16:09 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-04 3:58 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-04 11:07 ` Jon Hunter
2026-03-04 18:11 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] cgroup/cpuset: Call housekeeping_update() without holding cpus_read_lock Waiman Long
2026-03-02 12:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-02 14:15 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-02 15:40 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-23 20:57 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix partition related locking issues Tejun Heo
2026-02-23 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-24 7:51 ` Chen Ridong
2026-03-02 12:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260221185418.29319-2-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.