From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Chen Ridong" <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] cgroup/cpuset: Move housekeeping_update()/rebuild_sched_domains() together
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 16:51:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaBsDV7X0q4sNTTJ@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260221185418.29319-7-longman@redhat.com>
Le Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 01:54:16PM -0500, Waiman Long a écrit :
> With the latest changes in sched/isolation.c, rebuild_sched_domains*()
> requires the HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping cpumask to be properly
> updated first, if needed, before the sched domains can be
> rebuilt. So the two naturally fit together. Do that by creating a new
> update_hk_sched_domains() helper to house both actions.
>
> The name of the isolated_cpus_updating flag to control the
> call to housekeeping_update() is now outdated. So change it to
> update_housekeeping to better reflect its purpose. Also move the call
> to update_hk_sched_domains() to the end of cpuset and hotplug operations
> before releasing the cpuset_mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-26 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-21 18:54 [PATCH v6 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix partition related locking issues Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect change to effective_xcpus in partition_xcpus_del() Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect use of cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask() in update_cpumasks_hier() Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] cgroup/cpuset: Clarify exclusion rules for cpuset internal variables Waiman Long
2026-02-26 15:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] cgroup/cpuset: Set isolated_cpus_updating only if isolated_cpus is changed Waiman Long
2026-02-26 15:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] kselftest/cgroup: Simplify test_cpuset_prs.sh by removing "S+" command Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] cgroup/cpuset: Move housekeeping_update()/rebuild_sched_domains() together Waiman Long
2026-02-26 15:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] cgroup/cpuset: Defer housekeeping_update() calls from CPU hotplug to workqueue Waiman Long
2026-02-26 16:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 16:00 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-03 22:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-04 4:05 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-02 11:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-03 15:18 ` Jon Hunter
2026-03-03 16:09 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-04 3:58 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-04 11:07 ` Jon Hunter
2026-03-04 18:11 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-21 18:54 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] cgroup/cpuset: Call housekeeping_update() without holding cpus_read_lock Waiman Long
2026-03-02 12:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-03-02 14:15 ` Waiman Long
2026-03-02 15:40 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-23 20:57 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] cgroup/cpuset: Fix partition related locking issues Tejun Heo
2026-02-23 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2026-02-24 7:51 ` Chen Ridong
2026-03-02 12:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaBsDV7X0q4sNTTJ@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.