All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] mm/memcontrol, page_counter: Make memory.low tier-aware
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:36:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202602241310.PE1e03sT-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223223830.586018-6-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>

Hi Joshua,

[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joshua-Hahn/mm-page_counter-Introduce-tiered-memory-awareness-to-page_counter/20260224-073845
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260223223830.586018-6-joshua.hahnjy%40gmail.com
patch subject: [RFC PATCH 5/6] mm/memcontrol, page_counter: Make memory.low tier-aware
config: x86_64-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260224/202602241310.PE1e03sT-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260224/202602241310.PE1e03sT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602241310.PE1e03sT-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> mm/vmscan.c:6003:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'tier_aware_memcg_limits'
    6003 |                                         tier_aware_memcg_limits && toptier)) {
         |                                         ^
   1 error generated.


vim +/tier_aware_memcg_limits +6003 mm/vmscan.c

  5957	
  5958	static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
  5959	{
  5960		struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
  5961		struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = {
  5962			.pgdat = pgdat,
  5963		};
  5964		struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie *partial = &reclaim;
  5965		struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
  5966		bool toptier = node_is_toptier(pgdat->node_id);
  5967	
  5968		/*
  5969		 * In most cases, direct reclaimers can do partial walks
  5970		 * through the cgroup tree, using an iterator state that
  5971		 * persists across invocations. This strikes a balance between
  5972		 * fairness and allocation latency.
  5973		 *
  5974		 * For kswapd, reliable forward progress is more important
  5975		 * than a quick return to idle. Always do full walks.
  5976		 */
  5977		if (current_is_kswapd() || sc->memcg_full_walk)
  5978			partial = NULL;
  5979	
  5980		memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, NULL, partial);
  5981		do {
  5982			struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
  5983			unsigned long reclaimed;
  5984			unsigned long scanned;
  5985	
  5986			/*
  5987			 * This loop can become CPU-bound when target memcgs
  5988			 * aren't eligible for reclaim - either because they
  5989			 * don't have any reclaimable pages, or because their
  5990			 * memory is explicitly protected. Avoid soft lockups.
  5991			 */
  5992			cond_resched();
  5993	
  5994			mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(target_memcg, memcg, toptier);
  5995	
  5996			if (mem_cgroup_below_min(target_memcg, memcg)) {
  5997				/*
  5998				 * Hard protection.
  5999				 * If there is no reclaimable memory, OOM.
  6000				 */
  6001				continue;
  6002			} else if (mem_cgroup_below_low(target_memcg, memcg,
> 6003						tier_aware_memcg_limits && toptier)) {
  6004				/*
  6005				 * Soft protection.
  6006				 * Respect the protection only as long as
  6007				 * there is an unprotected supply
  6008				 * of reclaimable memory from other cgroups.
  6009				 */
  6010				if (!sc->memcg_low_reclaim) {
  6011					sc->memcg_low_skipped = 1;
  6012					continue;
  6013				}
  6014				memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW);
  6015			}
  6016	
  6017			reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
  6018			scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
  6019	
  6020			shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
  6021	
  6022			shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg,
  6023				    sc->priority);
  6024	
  6025			/* Record the group's reclaim efficiency */
  6026			if (!sc->proactive)
  6027				vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false,
  6028					   sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
  6029					   sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
  6030	
  6031			/* If partial walks are allowed, bail once goal is reached */
  6032			if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
  6033				mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
  6034				break;
  6035			}
  6036		} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, memcg, partial)));
  6037	}
  6038	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-24  5:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23 22:38 [RFC PATCH 0/6] mm/memcontrol: Make memcg limits tier-aware Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] mm/memory-tiers: Introduce tier-aware memcg limit sysfs Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] mm/page_counter: Introduce tiered memory awareness to page_counter Joshua Hahn
2026-02-24  9:25   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] mm/memory-tiers, memcontrol: Introduce toptier capacity updates Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] mm/memcontrol: Charge and uncharge from toptier Joshua Hahn
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] mm/memcontrol, page_counter: Make memory.low tier-aware Joshua Hahn
2026-02-24  3:33   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-24  5:36   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-02-23 22:38 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] mm/memcontrol: Make memory.high tier-aware Joshua Hahn
2026-02-24  6:47   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-11 22:05   ` Bing Jiao
2026-03-12 19:44     ` Joshua Hahn
2026-03-24 10:51   ` Donet Tom
2026-03-24 15:23     ` Gregory Price
2026-03-24 15:46       ` Donet Tom
2026-03-24 15:44     ` Joshua Hahn
2026-03-24 16:06       ` Donet Tom
2026-02-24 11:27 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] mm/memcontrol: Make memcg limits tier-aware Michal Hocko
2026-02-24 16:13   ` Joshua Hahn
2026-02-24 18:49     ` Gregory Price
2026-02-24 20:03       ` Kaiyang Zhao
2026-02-26  8:04     ` Michal Hocko
2026-02-26 16:08       ` Joshua Hahn
2026-03-24 10:30 ` Donet Tom
2026-03-24 14:58   ` Joshua Hahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202602241310.PE1e03sT-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.