All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Blaise Boscaccy <bboscaccy@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] pkcs7: better handling of signed attributes
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:13:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260226021331.GA55502@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260225211907.7368-1-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 04:19:02PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Although the biggest use of signed attributes is PKCS#7 and X509
> specific data, they can be added to a signature to support arbitrary
> and verifiable objects.  This makes them particularly useful when you
> want to take an existing signature scheme and extend it with
> additional (but always verified) data in such a way that it still
> looks valid to both the old and new schemes.

What kernel subsystem is going to use this, and how?  As-is the only
caller of pkcs7_get_authattr() that you've proposed is in test code.

If this is for some out-of-tree module, we don't do that.

I'll also note that we should generally be aiming to simplify the PKCS#7
signature verification code, not making it even more complex.

- Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-26  2:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-25 21:19 [PATCH v3 0/5] pkcs7: better handling of signed attributes James Bottomley
2026-02-25 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] certs: break out pkcs7 check into its own function James Bottomley
2026-02-25 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] crypto: pkcs7: add flag for validated trust on a signed info block James Bottomley
2026-02-25 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] crypto: pkcs7: allow pkcs7_digest() to be called from pkcs7_trust James Bottomley
2026-02-26 20:31   ` Eric Biggers
2026-02-27  3:50     ` James Bottomley
2026-03-05  7:58       ` Eric Biggers
2026-03-05 14:53         ` James Bottomley
2026-03-05 18:50           ` Eric Biggers
2026-03-05 20:11             ` James Bottomley
2026-03-05 21:36               ` Eric Biggers
2026-03-05 22:06                 ` James Bottomley
2026-02-25 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] crypto: pkcs7: add ability to extract signed attributes by OID James Bottomley
2026-02-25 21:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] crypto: pkcs7: add tests for pkcs7_get_authattr James Bottomley
2026-02-26  1:12   ` kernel test robot
2026-02-26  2:13 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-02-26 12:43   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] pkcs7: better handling of signed attributes James Bottomley
2026-03-05  7:55     ` Eric Biggers
2026-03-05 14:46       ` James Bottomley
2026-03-05 18:51         ` Eric Biggers
2026-03-05 20:18           ` James Bottomley
2026-03-05 21:40             ` Eric Biggers
2026-03-05 22:11               ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260226021331.GA55502@quark \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=bboscaccy@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.