From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Andre Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uaccess: Fix build of scoped user access with const pointer
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2026 21:59:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260301215950.2fef5722@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wixyP1mzyVcpZqQZd_xbabZQ873KVph3L-EkrNZGv3Ygw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 12:01:08 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 at 11:34, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
> <chleroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > - for (void __user *_tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl); \
> > + for (void __user *_tmpptr = (void __user *) \
> > + __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl); \
>
> Why are you casting this return value? Wouldn't it be a lot better to
> just make the types be the CORRECT ones?
>
> I didn't test this, so maybe I'm missing something, but why isn't that
> just doing
>
> for (auto _tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr,
> size, elbl); \
>
> instead? No cast, just a "use the right type automatically".
>
> That macro actually does something similar just a few lines later, in
> that the innermost loop uses
>
> for (const typeof(uptr) uptr = _tmpptr; !done; done = true)
>
> which picks up the type automatically from the argument (and then it
> uses the argument both for the type and name, which is horrendously
> confusing, but that's a separate thing).
>
> Does that simple "auto" approach break something else?
This is what I needed to do:
(Note that is pre-dates 'auto', but it should work.)
Send at 21:56 on dec 20.
If a 'const struct foo __user *ptr' is used for the address passed
to scoped_user_read_access() then you get a warning/error
uaccess.h:691:1: error: initialization discards 'const' qualifier
from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
for the
void __user *_tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl)
assignment.
Fix by using typeof(uptr) in that assignment and changing the 'read' functions
to use 'const void __user *ptr' rather than 'void __user *ptr'.
Fixes: e497310b4ffb "(uaccess: Provide scoped user access regions)"
Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/uaccess.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
index 1f3804245c06..c5d5f2d395bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
@@ -650,32 +650,32 @@ static inline void user_access_restore(unsigned long flags) { }
#define user_rw_access_end() user_access_end()
/* Scoped user access */
-#define USER_ACCESS_GUARD(_mode) \
-static __always_inline void __user * \
-class_user_##_mode##_begin(void __user *ptr) \
+#define USER_ACCESS_GUARD(_mode, type) \
+static __always_inline type __user * \
+class_user_##_mode##_begin(type __user *ptr) \
{ \
return ptr; \
} \
\
static __always_inline void \
-class_user_##_mode##_end(void __user *ptr) \
+class_user_##_mode##_end(type __user *ptr) \
{ \
user_##_mode##_access_end(); \
} \
\
-DEFINE_CLASS(user_ ##_mode## _access, void __user *, \
+DEFINE_CLASS(user_ ##_mode## _access, type __user *, \
class_user_##_mode##_end(_T), \
- class_user_##_mode##_begin(ptr), void __user *ptr) \
+ class_user_##_mode##_begin(ptr), type __user *ptr) \
\
static __always_inline class_user_##_mode##_access_t \
-class_user_##_mode##_access_ptr(void __user *scope) \
+class_user_##_mode##_access_ptr(type __user *scope) \
{ \
return scope; \
}
-USER_ACCESS_GUARD(read)
-USER_ACCESS_GUARD(write)
-USER_ACCESS_GUARD(rw)
+USER_ACCESS_GUARD(read, const void)
+USER_ACCESS_GUARD(write, void)
+USER_ACCESS_GUARD(rw, void)
#undef USER_ACCESS_GUARD
/**
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ USER_ACCESS_GUARD(rw)
*/
#define __scoped_user_access(mode, uptr, size, elbl) \
for (bool done = false; !done; done = true) \
- for (void __user *_tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl); \
+ for (typeof(uptr) _tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl); \
!done; done = true) \
for (CLASS(user_##mode##_access, scope)(_tmpptr); !done; done = true) \
/* Force modified pointer usage within the scope */ \
--
2.39.5
David
>
> Linus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Andre Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uaccess: Fix build of scoped user access with const pointer
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2026 21:59:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260301215950.2fef5722@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wixyP1mzyVcpZqQZd_xbabZQ873KVph3L-EkrNZGv3Ygw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 12:01:08 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 at 11:34, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
> <chleroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > - for (void __user *_tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl); \
> > + for (void __user *_tmpptr = (void __user *) \
> > + __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl); \
>
> Why are you casting this return value? Wouldn't it be a lot better to
> just make the types be the CORRECT ones?
>
> I didn't test this, so maybe I'm missing something, but why isn't that
> just doing
>
> for (auto _tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr,
> size, elbl); \
>
> instead? No cast, just a "use the right type automatically".
>
> That macro actually does something similar just a few lines later, in
> that the innermost loop uses
>
> for (const typeof(uptr) uptr = _tmpptr; !done; done = true)
>
> which picks up the type automatically from the argument (and then it
> uses the argument both for the type and name, which is horrendously
> confusing, but that's a separate thing).
>
> Does that simple "auto" approach break something else?
This is what I needed to do:
(Note that is pre-dates 'auto', but it should work.)
Send at 21:56 on dec 20.
If a 'const struct foo __user *ptr' is used for the address passed
to scoped_user_read_access() then you get a warning/error
uaccess.h:691:1: error: initialization discards 'const' qualifier
from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
for the
void __user *_tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl)
assignment.
Fix by using typeof(uptr) in that assignment and changing the 'read' functions
to use 'const void __user *ptr' rather than 'void __user *ptr'.
Fixes: e497310b4ffb "(uaccess: Provide scoped user access regions)"
Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/uaccess.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h
index 1f3804245c06..c5d5f2d395bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/uaccess.h
+++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h
@@ -650,32 +650,32 @@ static inline void user_access_restore(unsigned long flags) { }
#define user_rw_access_end() user_access_end()
/* Scoped user access */
-#define USER_ACCESS_GUARD(_mode) \
-static __always_inline void __user * \
-class_user_##_mode##_begin(void __user *ptr) \
+#define USER_ACCESS_GUARD(_mode, type) \
+static __always_inline type __user * \
+class_user_##_mode##_begin(type __user *ptr) \
{ \
return ptr; \
} \
\
static __always_inline void \
-class_user_##_mode##_end(void __user *ptr) \
+class_user_##_mode##_end(type __user *ptr) \
{ \
user_##_mode##_access_end(); \
} \
\
-DEFINE_CLASS(user_ ##_mode## _access, void __user *, \
+DEFINE_CLASS(user_ ##_mode## _access, type __user *, \
class_user_##_mode##_end(_T), \
- class_user_##_mode##_begin(ptr), void __user *ptr) \
+ class_user_##_mode##_begin(ptr), type __user *ptr) \
\
static __always_inline class_user_##_mode##_access_t \
-class_user_##_mode##_access_ptr(void __user *scope) \
+class_user_##_mode##_access_ptr(type __user *scope) \
{ \
return scope; \
}
-USER_ACCESS_GUARD(read)
-USER_ACCESS_GUARD(write)
-USER_ACCESS_GUARD(rw)
+USER_ACCESS_GUARD(read, const void)
+USER_ACCESS_GUARD(write, void)
+USER_ACCESS_GUARD(rw, void)
#undef USER_ACCESS_GUARD
/**
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ USER_ACCESS_GUARD(rw)
*/
#define __scoped_user_access(mode, uptr, size, elbl) \
for (bool done = false; !done; done = true) \
- for (void __user *_tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl); \
+ for (typeof(uptr) _tmpptr = __scoped_user_access_begin(mode, uptr, size, elbl); \
!done; done = true) \
for (CLASS(user_##mode##_access, scope)(_tmpptr); !done; done = true) \
/* Force modified pointer usage within the scope */ \
--
2.39.5
David
>
> Linus
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-01 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-01 19:33 [PATCH] uaccess: Fix build of scoped user access with const pointer Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-03-01 19:33 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-03-01 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-03-01 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-03-01 21:59 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-03-01 21:59 ` David Laight
2026-03-01 22:16 ` David Laight
2026-03-01 22:16 ` David Laight
2026-03-01 21:52 ` David Laight
2026-03-01 21:52 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260301215950.2fef5722@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.