[PATCH 1/2] lib: fix compare_delta parameter order in percpu_counter_tree

[PATCH 1/2] lib: fix compare_delta parameter order in percpu_counter_tree

[David Carlier]

The compare_delta() helper takes (delta, accuracy_neg, accuracy_pos),
but every call site passes (delta, accuracy_pos, accuracy_neg) — the
last two arguments are consistently swapped.

The documented invariant (include/linux/percpu_counter_tree.h) is:

  (precise_sum - under) <= approx_sum <= (precise_sum + over)

Which means precise_sum is in [approx_sum - over, approx_sum + under].

For a positive delta (v - approx_sum >= 0), accuracy_pos must be
"under" (the maximum amount precise_sum can exceed approx_sum).
For a negative delta, accuracy_neg must be "over". Since under > over
always (batch_size * M vs (batch_size - 1) * M), swapping them causes
false definitive results: the functions return 1 ("v > counter") when
the correct answer is 0 (indeterminate).

This affects all comparison functions:
- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value()
- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare()
- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value()
- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare()

The precise variants are also affected because their approximate
fast-path can short-circuit with a wrong result, skipping the precise
sum computation.

Fix by swapping the parameter order in compare_delta() itself, since
all call sites are consistently swapped.

Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
---
 lib/percpu_counter_tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c b/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c
index 5c8fc2dcdc16..beb1144e6450 100644
--- a/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c
+++ b/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ long percpu_counter_tree_precise_sum(struct percpu_counter_tree *counter)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_counter_tree_precise_sum);
 
 static
-int compare_delta(long delta, unsigned long accuracy_neg, unsigned long accuracy_pos)
+int compare_delta(long delta, unsigned long accuracy_pos, unsigned long accuracy_neg)
 {
 	if (delta >= 0) {
 		if (delta <= accuracy_pos)
-- 
2.51.0

[PATCH 2/2] lib: add kunit boundary tests for percpu_counter_tree comparisons

[David Carlier]

Add boundary tests for all four comparison APIs to validate that
the accuracy parameters are correctly applied:

- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value()
- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value()
- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare()
- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare()

The single-value tests probe the accuracy range boundaries (at,
beyond, and in the asymmetric gap between under and over) to catch
swapped accuracy parameters. The two-counter tests verify the
symmetric combined accuracy boundary for counter-to-counter
comparisons.

Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
---
 lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c | 190 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 190 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c b/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c
index a79176655c4b..4d058bc78f7d 100644
--- a/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c
@@ -86,6 +86,194 @@ static void check_counters(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&counter[0], &counter[1]));
 }
 
+static void hpcc_test_compare_value_boundaries(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct percpu_counter_tree pct;
+	struct percpu_counter_tree_level_item *counter_items;
+	unsigned long under = 0, over = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	counter_items = kzalloc(percpu_counter_tree_items_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, counter_items, NULL);
+	ret = percpu_counter_tree_init(&pct, counter_items, 32, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct, 0);
+	percpu_counter_tree_approximate_accuracy_range(&pct, &under, &over);
+
+	/*
+	 * With approx_sum = precise_sum = 0, from the accuracy invariant:
+	 *   approx_sum - over <= precise_sum <= approx_sum + under
+	 * Positive deltas use 'under' as tolerance, negative use 'over'.
+	 */
+
+	/* --- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value --- */
+
+	/* At boundary: indeterminate */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(&pct,
+			(long)under));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(&pct,
+			-(long)over));
+
+	/* Beyond boundary: definitive */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(&pct,
+			(long)(under + 1)));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(&pct,
+			-(long)(over + 1)));
+
+	/* Asymmetric gap: catches swapped accuracy parameters */
+	if (under != over) {
+		if (under > over) {
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+				percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(
+					&pct, (long)(over + 1)));
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
+				percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(
+					&pct, -(long)(over + 1)));
+		} else {
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+				percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(
+					&pct, (long)(under + 1)));
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+				percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(
+					&pct, -(long)(under + 1)));
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* --- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value --- */
+
+	/*
+	 * With approx_sum = precise_sum = 0, the precise comparison
+	 * must return the exact result. At boundary values the
+	 * approximate fast-path returns indeterminate, exercising
+	 * the precise sum fallback.
+	 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct, 0));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct,
+			(long)under));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct,
+			-(long)over));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct,
+			(long)(under + 1)));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct,
+			-(long)(over + 1)));
+
+	if (under != over) {
+		if (under > over) {
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+				percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(
+					&pct, (long)(over + 1)));
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
+				percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(
+					&pct, -(long)(over + 1)));
+		} else {
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+				percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(
+					&pct, (long)(under + 1)));
+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
+				percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(
+					&pct, -(long)(under + 1)));
+		}
+	}
+
+	percpu_counter_tree_destroy(&pct);
+	kfree(counter_items);
+}
+
+static void hpcc_test_compare_counter_boundaries(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct percpu_counter_tree pct[2];
+	struct percpu_counter_tree_level_item *counter_items;
+	unsigned long under = 0, over = 0;
+	unsigned long combined;
+	int ret;
+
+	counter_items = kzalloc(percpu_counter_tree_items_size() * 2,
+				GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, counter_items, NULL);
+	ret = percpu_counter_tree_init_many(pct, counter_items, 2, 32,
+					    GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	percpu_counter_tree_approximate_accuracy_range(&pct[0],
+						       &under, &over);
+
+	/*
+	 * Both counters have the same configuration. The combined
+	 * accuracy for two-counter comparison is symmetric:
+	 *   accuracy_pos = over + under = under + over = accuracy_neg
+	 */
+	combined = under + over;
+
+	/* --- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare --- */
+
+	/* At boundary: indeterminate */
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], (long)combined);
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 0);
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], (long)combined);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+
+	/* Beyond boundary: definitive */
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], (long)(combined + 1));
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 0);
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], (long)(combined + 1));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+
+	/* --- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare --- */
+
+	/* At boundary: precise gives exact result */
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], (long)combined);
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 0);
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], (long)combined);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+
+	/* Beyond boundary: definitive */
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], (long)(combined + 1));
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 0);
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], (long)(combined + 1));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+
+	/* Equal counters */
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 42);
+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 42);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
+
+	percpu_counter_tree_destroy_many(pct, 2);
+	kfree(counter_items);
+}
+
 static int multi_thread_worker_fn(void *data)
 {
 	struct multi_thread_test_data *td = data;
@@ -383,6 +571,8 @@ static struct kunit_case hpcc_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_single_thread_random),
 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_multi_thread_batch_increment),
 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_multi_thread_random_walk),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_compare_value_boundaries),
+	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_compare_counter_boundaries),
 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_init_one),
 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_set),
 	{}
-- 
2.51.0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib: fix compare_delta parameter order in percpu_counter_tree

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

On 2026-03-16 10:38, David Carlier wrote:
> The compare_delta() helper takes (delta, accuracy_neg, accuracy_pos),
> but every call site passes (delta, accuracy_pos, accuracy_neg) — the
> last two arguments are consistently swapped.
> 
> The documented invariant (include/linux/percpu_counter_tree.h) is:
> 
>    (precise_sum - under) <= approx_sum <= (precise_sum + over)
> 
> Which means precise_sum is in [approx_sum - over, approx_sum + under].
> 
> For a positive delta (v - approx_sum >= 0), accuracy_pos must be
> "under" (the maximum amount precise_sum can exceed approx_sum).
> For a negative delta, accuracy_neg must be "over". Since under > over
> always (batch_size * M vs (batch_size - 1) * M), swapping them causes
> false definitive results: the functions return 1 ("v > counter") when
> the correct answer is 0 (indeterminate).
> 
> This affects all comparison functions:
> - percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value()
> - percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare()
> - percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value()
> - percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare()
> 
> The precise variants are also affected because their approximate
> fast-path can short-circuit with a wrong result, skipping the precise
> sum computation.
> 
> Fix by swapping the parameter order in compare_delta() itself, since
> all call sites are consistently swapped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

> ---
>   lib/percpu_counter_tree.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c b/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c
> index 5c8fc2dcdc16..beb1144e6450 100644
> --- a/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/percpu_counter_tree.c
> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ long percpu_counter_tree_precise_sum(struct percpu_counter_tree *counter)
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_counter_tree_precise_sum);
>   
>   static
> -int compare_delta(long delta, unsigned long accuracy_neg, unsigned long accuracy_pos)
> +int compare_delta(long delta, unsigned long accuracy_pos, unsigned long accuracy_neg)
>   {
>   	if (delta >= 0) {
>   		if (delta <= accuracy_pos)


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

Re: [PATCH 2/2] lib: add kunit boundary tests for percpu_counter_tree comparisons

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

On 2026-03-16 10:38, David Carlier wrote:
> Add boundary tests for all four comparison APIs to validate that
> the accuracy parameters are correctly applied:
> 
> - percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value()
> - percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value()
> - percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare()
> - percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare()
> 
> The single-value tests probe the accuracy range boundaries (at,
> beyond, and in the asymmetric gap between under and over) to catch
> swapped accuracy parameters. The two-counter tests verify the
> symmetric combined accuracy boundary for counter-to-counter
> comparisons.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com

Re: [PATCH 2/2] lib: add kunit boundary tests for percpu_counter_tree comparisons

[Josh Law]

On 16 March 2026 14:38:05 GMT, David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> wrote:
>Add boundary tests for all four comparison APIs to validate that
>the accuracy parameters are correctly applied:
>
>- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value()
>- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value()
>- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare()
>- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare()
>
>The single-value tests probe the accuracy range boundaries (at,
>beyond, and in the asymmetric gap between under and over) to catch
>swapped accuracy parameters. The two-counter tests verify the
>symmetric combined accuracy boundary for counter-to-counter
>comparisons.
>
>Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
>---
> lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c | 190 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 190 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c b/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c
>index a79176655c4b..4d058bc78f7d 100644
>--- a/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c
>+++ b/lib/tests/percpu_counter_tree_kunit.c
>@@ -86,6 +86,194 @@ static void check_counters(struct kunit *test)
> 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&counter[0], &counter[1]));
> }
> 
>+static void hpcc_test_compare_value_boundaries(struct kunit *test)
>+{
>+	struct percpu_counter_tree pct;
>+	struct percpu_counter_tree_level_item *counter_items;
>+	unsigned long under = 0, over = 0;
>+	int ret;
>+
>+	counter_items = kzalloc(percpu_counter_tree_items_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
>+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, counter_items, NULL);
>+	ret = percpu_counter_tree_init(&pct, counter_items, 32, GFP_KERNEL);
>+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>+
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct, 0);
>+	percpu_counter_tree_approximate_accuracy_range(&pct, &under, &over);
>+
>+	/*
>+	 * With approx_sum = precise_sum = 0, from the accuracy invariant:
>+	 *   approx_sum - over <= precise_sum <= approx_sum + under
>+	 * Positive deltas use 'under' as tolerance, negative use 'over'.
>+	 */
>+
>+	/* --- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value --- */
>+
>+	/* At boundary: indeterminate */
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(&pct,
>+			(long)under));
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(&pct,
>+			-(long)over));
>+
>+	/* Beyond boundary: definitive */
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(&pct,
>+			(long)(under + 1)));
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(&pct,
>+			-(long)(over + 1)));
>+
>+	/* Asymmetric gap: catches swapped accuracy parameters */
>+	if (under != over) {
>+		if (under > over) {
>+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
>+				percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(
>+					&pct, (long)(over + 1)));
>+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
>+				percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(
>+					&pct, -(long)(over + 1)));
>+		} else {
>+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
>+				percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(
>+					&pct, (long)(under + 1)));
>+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
>+				percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare_value(
>+					&pct, -(long)(under + 1)));
>+		}
>+	}
>+
>+	/* --- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value --- */
>+
>+	/*
>+	 * With approx_sum = precise_sum = 0, the precise comparison
>+	 * must return the exact result. At boundary values the
>+	 * approximate fast-path returns indeterminate, exercising
>+	 * the precise sum fallback.
>+	 */
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct, 0));
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct,
>+			(long)under));
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct,
>+			-(long)over));
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct,
>+			(long)(under + 1)));
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(&pct,
>+			-(long)(over + 1)));
>+
>+	if (under != over) {
>+		if (under > over) {
>+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
>+				percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(
>+					&pct, (long)(over + 1)));
>+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
>+				percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(
>+					&pct, -(long)(over + 1)));
>+		} else {
>+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
>+				percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(
>+					&pct, (long)(under + 1)));
>+			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
>+				percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare_value(
>+					&pct, -(long)(under + 1)));
>+		}
>+	}
>+
>+	percpu_counter_tree_destroy(&pct);
>+	kfree(counter_items);
>+}
>+
>+static void hpcc_test_compare_counter_boundaries(struct kunit *test)
>+{
>+	struct percpu_counter_tree pct[2];
>+	struct percpu_counter_tree_level_item *counter_items;
>+	unsigned long under = 0, over = 0;
>+	unsigned long combined;
>+	int ret;
>+
>+	counter_items = kzalloc(percpu_counter_tree_items_size() * 2,
>+				GFP_KERNEL);
>+	KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, counter_items, NULL);
>+	ret = percpu_counter_tree_init_many(pct, counter_items, 2, 32,
>+					    GFP_KERNEL);
>+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>+
>+	percpu_counter_tree_approximate_accuracy_range(&pct[0],
>+						       &under, &over);
>+
>+	/*
>+	 * Both counters have the same configuration. The combined
>+	 * accuracy for two-counter comparison is symmetric:
>+	 *   accuracy_pos = over + under = under + over = accuracy_neg
>+	 */
>+	combined = under + over;
>+
>+	/* --- percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare --- */
>+
>+	/* At boundary: indeterminate */
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], (long)combined);
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 0);
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 0);
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], (long)combined);
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+
>+	/* Beyond boundary: definitive */
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], (long)(combined + 1));
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 0);
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 0);
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], (long)(combined + 1));
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+
>+	/* --- percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare --- */
>+
>+	/* At boundary: precise gives exact result */
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], (long)combined);
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 0);
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 0);
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], (long)combined);
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+
>+	/* Beyond boundary: definitive */
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], (long)(combined + 1));
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 0);
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 0);
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], (long)(combined + 1));
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -1,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+
>+	/* Equal counters */
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[0], 42);
>+	percpu_counter_tree_set(&pct[1], 42);
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_approximate_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0,
>+		percpu_counter_tree_precise_compare(&pct[0], &pct[1]));
>+
>+	percpu_counter_tree_destroy_many(pct, 2);
>+	kfree(counter_items);
>+}
>+
> static int multi_thread_worker_fn(void *data)
> {
> 	struct multi_thread_test_data *td = data;
>@@ -383,6 +571,8 @@ static struct kunit_case hpcc_test_cases[] = {
> 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_single_thread_random),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_multi_thread_batch_increment),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_multi_thread_random_walk),
>+	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_compare_value_boundaries),
>+	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_compare_counter_boundaries),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_init_one),
> 	KUNIT_CASE(hpcc_test_set),
> 	{}




Entire series Reviewed-by: Josh Law <objecting@objecting.org>


Good patch, keep it up! :)


V/R


Josh Law