From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Rong Xu <xur@google.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Piotr Gorski <piotrgorski@cachyos.org>,
Teresa Johnson <tejohnson@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] kbuild: move vmlinux.a build rule to scripts/Makefile.vmlinux_a
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 13:43:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260316204311.GA1329928@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1bQ=TqFwmm9NhBPnxaoTCqHOsm1Q6MLhNcqpYq4uObZxzk3A@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 11:16:41AM -0700, Rong Xu wrote:
> If that's the case, we can just remove flag "--thin". Can we verify if
> that works?
I think we can only remove it from the second llvm-ar invocation. I
tested
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 2b15f0b4a0cb..fb001e02cc0f 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1260,12 +1260,11 @@ ifdef CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS
KBUILD_MODULES := y
endif
-# '$(AR) mPi' needs 'T' to workaround the bug of llvm-ar <= 14
quiet_cmd_ar_vmlinux.a = AR $@
cmd_ar_vmlinux.a = \
rm -f $@; \
$(AR) cDPrST $@ $(KBUILD_VMLINUX_OBJS); \
- $(AR) mPiT $$($(AR) t $@ | sed -n 1p) $@ $$($(AR) t $@ | grep -F -f $(srctree)/scripts/head-object-list.txt)
+ $(AR) mPi $$($(AR) t $@ | sed -n 1p) $@ $$($(AR) t $@ | grep -F -f $(srctree)/scripts/head-object-list.txt)
targets += vmlinux.a
vmlinux.a: $(KBUILD_VMLINUX_OBJS) scripts/head-object-list.txt FORCE
--
on 7.0-rc4, which showed no issues. This is basically a revert of my
suggested workaround for the original issue:
https://lore.kernel.org/YyjjT5gQ2hGMH0ni@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
You could add this as a prerequisite patch, I don't think it should be
squashed into the move change, especially since that appears to be why
we are in this situation. Why are we converting from the 'T' modifier to
'--thin' in the move patch? I know the documentation of llvm-ar and GNU
ar says that 'T' is deprecated in favor of '--thin' because it may do
different things on various ar implementations but the kernel only
supports these two implementations. I think we should just copy the
commands as they are and address the deprecation separately, perhaps
with an ar-option like Nicolas suggested upthread.
How about a v3 that looks like:
Patch 1: The diff above because all supported llvm-ar versions do the
same thing as GNU ar.
Patch 2: The move patch without changing 'T' into '--thin'.
Patch 3: The same as before, perhaps without '--thin' as well.
You'll need to base on kbuild-next-unstable [1] to address the conflict
with Yonghong's "kbuild: Reduce the number of compiler-generated
suffixes for clang thin-lto build" [2].
[1]: https://git.kernel.org/kbuild/l/kbuild-next-unstable
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/20260307050250.3767489-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-28 18:28 [PATCH v5 0/2] kbuild: distributed build support for Clang ThinLTO xur
2025-10-28 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] kbuild: move vmlinux.a build rule to scripts/Makefile.vmlinux_a xur
2026-03-16 13:33 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-03-16 13:59 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-16 17:27 ` Rong Xu
2026-03-16 17:52 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-03-16 17:59 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-03-16 18:16 ` Rong Xu
2026-03-16 20:43 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2026-03-16 20:53 ` Rong Xu
2026-03-16 21:31 ` Rong Xu
2025-10-28 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] kbuild: distributed build support for Clang ThinLTO xur
2025-11-05 14:47 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-28 19:22 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Piotr Gorski
2025-12-04 17:49 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-12-04 18:36 ` Rong Xu
2026-03-12 8:25 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-03-12 11:45 ` Nicolas Schier
2026-03-12 17:50 ` Rong Xu
2026-03-13 14:50 ` Nicolas Schier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260316204311.GA1329928@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=piotrgorski@cachyos.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=tejohnson@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xur@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.